Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 02:36, 28 July 2011

A cheeseburger for you!

FaktneviM (talk) 15:09, 2 July 2011 (UTC)

A beer for you!

FaktneviM (talk) 15:09, 2 July 2011 (UTC)

Thanks!

I really appreciate the barnstar you gave me. It was a pleasant surprise and very thoughtful. 72Dino (talk) 16:35, 7 July 2011 (UTC)

Categories for discussion (nomination of WwCSGHa)

Category:Wikipedians with Celtic,Slavic,Germanic,Hebrew ancestors, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Pichpich (talk) 12:37, 9 July 2011 (UTC)

Thanks for informing me. I replied there and waiting for others consideration. --Sincerely ♥ FaktneviM (talk) 20:34, 10 July 2011 (UTC)

Hi, please see my reply to your comment at my talk page. Best, -- Black Falcon 17:13, 14 July 2011 (UTC)

--Sincerely ♥ FaktneviM (talk) 18:51, 15 July 2011 (UTC)

Thanks!

It was a pleasant surprise to wake up to another barnstar! I'm not sure what it was for (but probably related to my non-breaking-spaces hunt, I expect). Thanks :o) Pesky (talk …stalk!) 10:07, 20 July 2011 (UTC)

Exactly!

I am also happy you´re glad from the technical barnstar. --Sincerely ♥ FaktneviM (talk) 10:21, 20 July 2011 (UTC)

Editing others' comments

Please note that it is generally not appropriate to modify other editors' comments on Talk pages, including striking out what another editor has written. Obvious personal attacks that only attack another edit with no relevant discussion of article content can sometimes be struck out or deleted. However, this does not apply to words or phrases that you simply consider to be uncivil.--Jeffro77 (talk) 16:22, 21 July 2011 (UTC)

If some editor behave unproperly, should we tolerate that? All, who participated on that, should be ashamed, of course. Motives of BlackCab was simply contempted to at least 2 editors. Another uncivil-like comments from me and B Fizz. However, my own comment was not uncivil, but rather sort of unproper humor. Others rather showed their disrespect to other project members. Very sad you agree with this nasty behavior. I did mistake, when I gave the teamwork, in fact civility-like, barnstar to you. --Sincerely ♥ FaktneviM (talk) 17:37, 21 July 2011 (UTC)

Why did you use uncivil undone? this is marked as deleted edit like from vandals. I have right do same way as you did. --Sincerely ♥ FaktneviM (talk) 17:37, 21 July 2011 (UTC)

I reverted your change, because you should not have made the change to other editors' text in the first place. It is up to the original editor to retract comments that are merely 'uncivil'. In the context of 'uncivil' comments, it is only if there is an obvious personal attack that is not relevant to discussion that any editor may delete material. The relevant guideline states: "Editing – or even removing – others' comments is sometimes allowed. ... Removing harmful posts, including personal attacks, trolling and vandalism. This generally does not extend to messages that are merely uncivil; deletions of simple invective are controversial." My reversion of your improper editing does not indicate specific endorsement of any other editors' comments. However, there is a high degree of subjectivity in what you deemed to be 'uncivil'.--Jeffro77 (talk) 01:27, 22 July 2011 (UTC)

Refactorizing

Should I call to admins for refactor those ´weasel words´ a little bit with WP:RTP, WP:CIV, WP:AGF ? I could also refactor it with other ways, because strike off is not only way to do RTP. I carefully read that talk page again and I still think discussion started to deal with environment of wiki-stress due beginning personal attacks, disrespect and vile behavior WP:WQT. especially between project members WP:JW. It was like two-sided war, in which you - Jeffro77 and BlackCab permanently offend others saying all their arguments are irrelevant or using any other of ridiculing tactics. It is not first time I felt it. --Sincerely ♥ FaktneviM (talk) 23:34, 21 July 2011 (UTC)

I would suggest you (a) grow up; (b) get over it; and (c) focus on discussing content of articles rather than dwelling on talk page comments. You have admitted you made certain comments as a "joke", trying to "upset" me and provoke a response. You got it. Now just move on. BlackCab (talk) 23:55, 21 July 2011 (UTC)

Typical response. Could you also say moreover I am irrelevant and absurdity will be perfect. --Sincerely ♥ FaktneviM (talk) 00:03, 22 July 2011 (UTC)

Note

If you liked to keep such statements in the ´public article talk´, do as you wish. I will not to protest anymore.

My attitude that those words were inappropriate everyone can read it. If you disagree, I will not continue harass my personal values and mental peace with it.

This could be marked as "end" and my "giving up".

Have a nice day.

Sincerely ♥ FaktneviM (talk) 10:26, 22 July 2011 (UTC)

2700+ Chess GM´s

Methods for comparing top chess players throughout history

What is the reason behind your ranking? A rating of X is a rating of X. There is no need in listing shared ranks as unshared (and before you come up with the inflation argument - it doesn't matter as you still rate X higher than X-1...). And Kramnik's top rating was 2809, not 2811. See the ref. Can you show me the games which gave him that two additional points? The 2811 on the FIDE chart is a mistake (see FIDE lists). P.S. In the individual calculations, Kramnik has "no games" in January 2002, so he could have impossible gained two points there http://ratings.fide.com/hist.phtml?event=4101588). --Alexmagnus2 (talk) 18:44, 22 July 2011 (UTC)

Hi Alexmagnus2. I known your ref, but it was wrong.

Kramnik played 4 games and achieve 2811 ELO in January 2002 and maintain in April 2002 with 0 games played. Official FIDE here. I have my own personal MS Excel sheet with internet-automated-updating with macro. There are stats including all published FIDE ratings list since start of using ELO system in 1970´s. Those 79 players over 2700 rating includes some players ´before-ELO´, but was calculated backwards with system of Arpad Elo. (=Don´t worry. Not by me!). Regards. --Sincerely ♥ FaktneviM (talk) 19:37, 22 July 2011 (UTC)

Which 4 games? And why are they not in the individual calculations and respective FIDE lists (the additional 2 points appear in the FIDE lists after April 2003 though). I just want to clear up this mystery, once and forever. And what's with shared ratings?--Alexmagnus2 (talk) 20:10, 22 July 2011 (UTC)

Do not bother yourselves about nonsenses. He just played 4 games as you see in my ref. Not 2003, but 2002. FIDE have problem with several their pages. Sometimes they just fault. If is it mystery for you, that some (rather many) big international organizations have mess in their documents, I have rather mystery if some organization do not errors. --Sincerely ♥ FaktneviM (talk) 20:18, 22 July 2011 (UTC)

Stop

I have repeatedly requested that you restrict your comments to article content. I have repeatedly indicated sources supporting the material I have posted. If you continue your personal attacks by calling me 'extremist' or by placing false warnings on my Talk page, you will be reported.--Jeffro77 (talk) 13:27, 26 July 2011 (UTC)

If Jeffro77 removes your comments then please respect their wishes (per WP:REMOVED). Continuing to reverting them can be seen as uncivil and risk in being blocked for edit warring/disruption. Bidgee (talk) 15:06, 26 July 2011 (UTC)

July 2011

Please stop your disruptive behaviour. Your behaviour is verging on harassment. Misplaced Pages prides itself on providing a safe environment for its collaborators, and harassing edits, such as the one you made to User talk:Jeffro77‎, potentially compromise that safe environment. If you continue behaving like this, you may be blocked from editing. -danjel (talk to me) 02:36, 28 July 2011 (UTC)