Misplaced Pages

User talk:Bittergrey: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 13:19, 5 September 2011 editMiszaBot III (talk | contribs)597,462 editsm Archiving 1 thread(s) (older than 14d) to User talk:Bittergrey/Archive 2.← Previous edit Revision as of 18:42, 13 September 2011 edit undoWLU (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers52,243 edits Edit warring: new sectionNext edit →
Line 10: Line 10:
|archive = User talk:Bittergrey/Archive %(counter)d |archive = User talk:Bittergrey/Archive %(counter)d
}} }}

== Edit warring ==

] Your recent edits seem to have the appearance of ]&#32; after a review of the reverts you have made on ]. Users are expected to ] with others and avoid editing ].<br>
Please be particularly aware, the ] states that:
# '''Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.'''
# '''Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.'''
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's ] to discuss the changes; work towards a version that represents ] among editors. You can post a request for help at an ] or seek ]. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary ]. If you engage in an edit war, you '''may be ] from editing without further notice.'''{{Break}}You know that both myself and FB object to the removal of these sources. Your claims and comments have achieved no support, and Cantor's hypothesis is not a ]. Stop removing it on the basis of your personal preference. Slow edit wars are still edit wars. ] <small>] ] Misplaced Pages's rules:</small>]/] 18:42, 13 September 2011 (UTC)<!-- Template:uw-3rr -->

Revision as of 18:42, 13 September 2011

Archiving icon
My Talk Archives
Archive 1Archive 2Archive 3


This page has archives. Sections older than 14 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III.

Edit warring

Your recent edits seem to have the appearance of edit warring after a review of the reverts you have made on paraphilic infantilism. Users are expected to collaborate and discuss with others and avoid editing disruptively.

Please be particularly aware, the three-revert rule states that:

  1. Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.
  2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss the changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing without further notice.
You know that both myself and FB object to the removal of these sources. Your claims and comments have achieved no support, and Cantor's hypothesis is not a fringe theory. Stop removing it on the basis of your personal preference. Slow edit wars are still edit wars. WLU (t) (c) Misplaced Pages's rules:/complex 18:42, 13 September 2011 (UTC)