| Revision as of 04:44, 21 September 2011 editGogo Dodo (talk | contribs)Administrators197,922 edits →September 2011: uw-npov4← Previous edit | Revision as of 04:58, 21 September 2011 edit undoGogo Dodo (talk | contribs)Administrators197,922 edits →Re: wall st: new sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
| ] This is your '''last warning'''. The next time you violate Misplaced Pages's ] by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at ], you may be '''] from editing without further notice'''. <!-- Template:uw-npov4 --> -- ] (]) 04:44, 21 September 2011 (UTC) | ] This is your '''last warning'''. The next time you violate Misplaced Pages's ] by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at ], you may be '''] from editing without further notice'''. <!-- Template:uw-npov4 --> -- ] (]) 04:44, 21 September 2011 (UTC) | ||
| == Re: wall st == | |||
| Re : Misplaced Pages is not here to be your ] against the ills of the financial industry. Such issues are already covered in the ] section in a ]. It is obvious from your style of writing that your are attempting to promote this particular event and your views on Wall Street. Please do not add in the content again. Thank you. -- ] (]) 04:58, 21 September 2011 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 04:58, 21 September 2011
September 2011
Welcome to Misplaced Pages. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article Wall Street, please cite a reliable source for your addition. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. See Misplaced Pages:Citing sources for how to cite sources, and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you.
Acps110 03:28, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
Welcome to Misplaced Pages. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Wall Street has been reverted.
Your edit here to Wall Street was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (http://www.facebook.com/pages/TheAnonPress/194464753933126) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Misplaced Pages.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Misplaced Pages's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 04:15, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Misplaced Pages articles, as you did to Wall Street. Doing so violates Misplaced Pages's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 04:27, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Misplaced Pages, as you did at Wall Street, you will be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Wall Street was changed by Joshhenery (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.910652 on 2011-09-21T04:32:40+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 04:32, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
This is your last warning. The next time you violate Misplaced Pages's neutral point of view policy by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Wall Street, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 04:44, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
Re: wall st
Re your message: Misplaced Pages is not here to be your soapbox against the ills of the financial industry. Such issues are already covered in the Wall Street in the public imagination section in a neutral point of view. It is obvious from your style of writing that your are attempting to promote this particular event and your views on Wall Street. Please do not add in the content again. Thank you. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 04:58, 21 September 2011 (UTC)