Misplaced Pages

User:WLU: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from[REDACTED] with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 19:33, 1 June 2011 editWLU (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers52,243 edits ResearchEditor socking resources: more← Previous edit Revision as of 10:33, 22 September 2011 edit undoWLU (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers52,243 edits ResearchEditor socking resources: added PINext edit →
Line 38: Line 38:
**] **]
**] **]
**]
**] **]
**] **]

Revision as of 10:33, 22 September 2011

This editor is a Most Perfect Tutnum and is entitled to display this Book of Knowledge with Coffee Cup Stain and Cigarette Burn.
HA!
The Misplaced Pages philosophy can be summed up thusly: "Experts are scum." For some reason people who spend 40 years learning everything they can about, say, the Peloponnesian War -- and indeed, advancing the body of human knowledge -- get all pissy when their contributions are edited away by Randy in Boise who heard somewhere that sword-wielding skeletons were involved. And they get downright irate when asked politely to engage in discourse with Randy until the sword-skeleton theory can be incorporated into the article without passing judgment. Lore Sjöberg, "The Misplaced Pages FAQK"
Of course, what is always missed by this point of view, is that any expert can't just "know" something is true; they must demonstrate it through the use of reliable sources. Which they should have on hand, should be easily able to reference, and should be extremely scholarly. So nyah, keep yer panties on, world. WLU (t) (c) Misplaced Pages's rules:/complex 16:42, 13 March 2009 (UTC) Misplaced Pages editor
This is a Wikipedia user page.
This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user whom this page is about may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia. The original page is located at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:WLU.

ResearchEditor socking resources

Ritualabuse dot us links

  • /mindcontrol/eas-studies/ Ex-treme Abuse Survey Research
  • MEDIA PACKET - Torture-based, Government-sponsored Mind Control Experimentation on Children
  • /mindcontrol/eas-studies/torture-based-mind-control-as-a-global-phenomenon/ Preliminary data from the 2007 series of Ex-treme Abuse Surveys. Karriker, W. (2008, September). In Torture-based mind control: Empirical research, programmer methods, effects and treatment
  • /mindcontrol/eas-studies/understanding-ritual-trauma-a-comparison-of-findings-from-three-online-surveys/ Understanding ritual trauma: A comparison of findings from three online surveys
Divhide: providing a sense of mystery since June, 2008

Limited userboxes
I am deliberately avoiding adminship, but I'm intrigued to know if I'd be successful. Please don't nominate me.
I was a lemming of discord.
♂This user is male.
This user likes to can't stop himself from beating dead horses.
This user believes in templating the regulars because, hey, just because you've been around a while doesn't mean you are special.
This user HATES red links in disambiguation pages.]
All you need to know about me:
  • I'm verbose, so check out TLDR.
  • I like the policies and guidelines. If you're not familiar with them, try the simple ruleset.
  • I usually don't do e-mail; if it's about[REDACTED] use my talk page.
  • I like science and am interested in fringe topics; this generally translates into debunking the[REDACTED] pages.
  • Functionally this page is basically a messy sandbox for sources. I love my privacy so you won't find out stuff about me. For crap I've found useful, you are welcome to peruse the useless nightmare that is my forbidden divbox of mystery.
  • I've got a couple barnstars.
  • If you are a new editor, check out this long-ish essay I wrote; it's a basic overview into wikipedia's mores.
Mystery, forbidden divbox of

Useful stuff

  • *]
  • *, a google-style search engine and reference generator. Useful when the article doesn't have a pubmed number (old, social sciences or humanities) but the citation template isn't as neat and it does not fill in ISBN or pubmed numbers
  • *, used in conjunction with Diberry to find, and generate citation templates
  • *, incredibly useful, uses the number or isbn to automatically generate a citation template for you; the most useful if you have a pubmed or ISBN

Future resources

Satanic ritual abuse

Dissociative identity disorder/recovered memory

  • Herman JL, Harvey MR (1997). "Adult memories of childhood trauma: a naturalistic clinical study". J Trauma Stress. 10 (4): 557–71. PMID 9391941.
  • ISBN = 1557983402

Bad science in general

Child sex abuse accomodation syndrome

Orthomolecular medicine

CFS/ME

CFS is the same as ME

ME =/= CFS

  • - apparently not successful?

Acupuncture

Strength training

Categories:
User:WLU: Difference between revisions Add topic