Revision as of 02:00, 18 October 2011 editMandarax (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers388,559 edits Approved, except for QPQ review← Previous edit | Revision as of 02:08, 18 October 2011 edit undoMandarax (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers388,559 editsm Edit {{DYK nompage links}} and {{DYKmake}} for correct article titleNext edit → | ||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
|2= | |2= | ||
====Wilson Desk==== | ====Wilson Desk==== | ||
{{DYK nompage links|nompage=Wilson Desk|Wilson |
{{DYK nompage links|nompage=Wilson Desk|Wilson desk}} | ||
<div style="float:right;margin-left:0.5em;"> | <div style="float:right;margin-left:0.5em;"> | ||
] | ] | ||
</div><!-- | </div><!-- | ||
Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
<small>Created/expanded by ] (]). Self nom at 19:00, 16 October 2011 (UTC)</small> | <small>Created/expanded by ] (]). Self nom at 19:00, 16 October 2011 (UTC)</small> | ||
<!-- | <!-- | ||
*{{DYKmake|Wilson |
*{{DYKmake|Wilson desk|Found5dollar}} | ||
--> | --> | ||
Revision as of 02:08, 18 October 2011
Wilson Desk
( )- ... that Richard Nixon chose the Wilson desk (pictured) as his Oval Office desk because he believed it was used by Woodrow Wilson, but it was actually used by Henry Wilson, Vice President under Ulysses S. Grant?
Created/expanded by Found5dollar (talk). Self nom at 19:00, 16 October 2011 (UTC)
- Just moved out of user space and into main space. I do a ton of reviews for april fools every year. if i need to review one here to be eligible just let me know.--Found5dollar (talk) 19:04, 16 October 2011 (UTC)
- Everything on the checklist is fine, except for the QPQ review. I would say that a recent April Fools' review is fine; otherwise another review should be done.
I find the hook to be very interesting. The picture may not work very well as a thumbnail, but this would be good as a final "quirky" hook anyways. MANdARAX • XAЯAbИAM 02:00, 18 October 2011 (UTC)
- Everything on the checklist is fine, except for the QPQ review. I would say that a recent April Fools' review is fine; otherwise another review should be done.
]