| Revision as of 17:08, 26 October 2011 editG90025 (talk | contribs)312 editsm →Amy Winehouse← Previous edit | Revision as of 17:10, 26 October 2011 edit undoWizardman (talk | contribs)Administrators400,763 edits 3rrNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| ==Amy Winehouse== | ==Amy Winehouse== | ||
| I am trying to cite and improve the article. What exactly are you trying to do? I have cited clearly from reliable sources discussion of Winehouse being in this club and am improving on '''what was already there'''. If you have personal reasons why you think that's not good enough I suggest that you explain them on the talk page instead of removing cited content that a reasonable discussion is already occurring about on the talk page. --<font color="purple">]</font> <sup>]</sup> 16:56, 26 October 2011 (UTC) | I am trying to cite and improve the article. What exactly are you trying to do? I have cited clearly from reliable sources discussion of Winehouse being in this club and am improving on '''what was already there'''. If you have personal reasons why you think that's not good enough I suggest that you explain them on the talk page instead of removing cited content that a reasonable discussion is already occurring about on the talk page. --<font color="purple">]</font> <sup>]</sup> 16:56, 26 October 2011 (UTC) | ||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
| ::: And I have been attempting to improve things, despite your continued insistence of removing cites. Please stop this, it's not helping. As you keep claiming, there is already a discussion on the talk page of how to improve ]. Your efforts to force removal of content on the article while it's still being discussed is not helping. If you do not believe that this cited content, that has been there for some while, should not be there, and cannot be improved, then please explain on the talk page. --<font color="purple">]</font> <sup>]</sup> 17:05, 26 October 2011 (UTC) | ::: And I have been attempting to improve things, despite your continued insistence of removing cites. Please stop this, it's not helping. As you keep claiming, there is already a discussion on the talk page of how to improve ]. Your efforts to force removal of content on the article while it's still being discussed is not helping. If you do not believe that this cited content, that has been there for some while, should not be there, and cannot be improved, then please explain on the talk page. --<font color="purple">]</font> <sup>]</sup> 17:05, 26 October 2011 (UTC) | ||
| ::::Discussions are underway via the talk page to gather information on how the community feels. In just a few short months, we will be able to decide if the material should be added. ] (]) 17:08, 26 October 2011 (UTC) | ::::Discussions are underway via the talk page to gather information on how the community feels. In just a few short months, we will be able to decide if the material should be added. ] (]) 17:08, 26 October 2011 (UTC) | ||
| ==3rr== | |||
| ] Your recent edits seem to have the appearance of ]. Users are expected to ] with others and avoid editing ].<br> | |||
| Please be particularly aware, the ] states that: | |||
| # '''Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.''' | |||
| # '''Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.''' | |||
| If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's ] to discuss the changes; work towards a version that represents ] among editors. You can post a request for help at an ] or seek ]. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary ]. If you engage in an edit war, you '''may be ] from editing without further notice.'''<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> You have ten reverts in three hours, and honestly, should be lucky you weren't already blocked. ] <sub>]</sub> 17:10, 26 October 2011 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 17:10, 26 October 2011
Amy Winehouse
I am trying to cite and improve the article. What exactly are you trying to do? I have cited clearly from reliable sources discussion of Winehouse being in this club and am improving on what was already there. If you have personal reasons why you think that's not good enough I suggest that you explain them on the talk page instead of removing cited content that a reasonable discussion is already occurring about on the talk page. --Escape Orbit 16:56, 26 October 2011 (UTC)
- Actually, you are the one who has failed to visit the talk page where there is a clearly marked section on whether or not to add Winehouse to the list. There was a long discussion before which someone deleted, months and months ago, where the consensus was that there was not enough contributions from her to add her to the list. Someone deleted that and added her anyway and there has been an edit war ever since. G90025 (talk) 17:00, 26 October 2011 (UTC)
- And I have been attempting to improve things, despite your continued insistence of removing cites. Please stop this, it's not helping. As you keep claiming, there is already a discussion on the talk page of how to improve 27 club. Your efforts to force removal of content on the article while it's still being discussed is not helping. If you do not believe that this cited content, that has been there for some while, should not be there, and cannot be improved, then please explain on the talk page. --Escape Orbit 17:05, 26 October 2011 (UTC)
- Discussions are underway via the talk page to gather information on how the community feels. In just a few short months, we will be able to decide if the material should be added. G90025 (talk) 17:08, 26 October 2011 (UTC)
- And I have been attempting to improve things, despite your continued insistence of removing cites. Please stop this, it's not helping. As you keep claiming, there is already a discussion on the talk page of how to improve 27 club. Your efforts to force removal of content on the article while it's still being discussed is not helping. If you do not believe that this cited content, that has been there for some while, should not be there, and cannot be improved, then please explain on the talk page. --Escape Orbit 17:05, 26 October 2011 (UTC)
- Actually, you are the one who has failed to visit the talk page where there is a clearly marked section on whether or not to add Winehouse to the list. There was a long discussion before which someone deleted, months and months ago, where the consensus was that there was not enough contributions from her to add her to the list. Someone deleted that and added her anyway and there has been an edit war ever since. G90025 (talk) 17:00, 26 October 2011 (UTC)
3rr
Your recent edits seem to have the appearance of edit warring. Users are expected to collaborate and discuss with others and avoid editing disruptively.
Please be particularly aware, the three-revert rule states that:
- Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.
- Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss the changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. You have ten reverts in three hours, and honestly, should be lucky you weren't already blocked. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 17:10, 26 October 2011 (UTC)