Misplaced Pages

:Articles for deletion/Media Data Extended: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 16:32, 16 November 2011 editKvng (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, New page reviewers108,097 edits Merge← Previous edit Revision as of 18:11, 16 November 2011 edit undoFleetCommand (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users20,812 edits Misplaced Pages:Arguments to avoid#Per nominatorNext edit →
Line 21: Line 21:


*'''Merge and redirect''' as per Dennis Brown. --] (]) 16:32, 16 November 2011 (UTC) *'''Merge and redirect''' as per Dennis Brown. --] (]) 16:32, 16 November 2011 (UTC)
**No offense but our dear Dennis Brown as well as all of you should know that "merge" and "redirect" are antonyms in Misplaced Pages AFD vernacular. "Merge" is akin to "keep" (it means "keep elsewhere"), "redirect" is akin to "delete" (it means "delete all but the title"). I hope you do excuse me, but I couldn't resist commenting on this, although I gather that {{Section link|Misplaced Pages:Arguments to avoid|Per nominator}} also couldn't resist. ] (]) 18:11, 16 November 2011 (UTC)

Revision as of 18:11, 16 November 2011

Media Data Extended

Media Data Extended (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:44, 2 November 2011 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Fleet Command (talk) 06:32, 6 November 2011 (UTC)

Fails to comply with Misplaced Pages:Notability as this subject fails to provide evidences of significant coverage in reliable secondary sources. Regards, Fleet Command (talk) 19:53, 2 November 2011 (UTC)


Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein  10:07, 13 November 2011 (UTC)

Categories: