| Revision as of 18:43, 11 December 2011 editCptnono (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers26,588 edits →AE← Previous edit | Revision as of 01:40, 14 December 2011 edit undoHJ Mitchell (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Autopatrolled, Checkusers, Oversighters, Administrators121,844 edits →AE: new sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 147: | Line 147: | ||
| : ] (]) 08:21, 11 December 2011 (UTC) | : ] (]) 08:21, 11 December 2011 (UTC) | ||
| == AE == | |||
| The recent AE thread concerning yourself and Nableezy has been closed. This is not a formal enforcement action, but the consensus was that you should be advised to take greater care to avoid Nableezy in accordance with your interaction ban—in particular, please take care, where practical, to avoid articles where he is active and take particular care not to get into edit wars in which he has been involved. Again, this is not an enforcement action, but you should consider yourself so advised as of this message. Thanks, ] | ] 01:40, 14 December 2011 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 01:40, 14 December 2011
Template:Archive box collapsible
Death
Hello, why you removed the book section from Death article, it has reliable sources, supported by the Chuck himself and probabely the only book written about him when he was alive, please do not remove it again. Spada II ♪♫ (talk) 19:54, 2 October 2011 (UTC)
- I plan on removing it again. The reasoning is on the talk page.Cptnono (talk) 20:01, 2 October 2011 (UTC)
- I edited the section, feel free to edit it if you think its not nuetral, it deserve to be in the article due to reliable sources and Chuck's words about it. Spada II ♪♫ (talk) 20:19, 2 October 2011 (UTC)
- Don;t talk to me here, go see the talk page.Cptnono (talk) 20:25, 2 October 2011 (UTC)
- ok, check the talk page I added a video to back me up. Spada II ♪♫ (talk) 20:52, 2 October 2011 (UTC)
Seattle Sounders redirect discussion
I have provided some page view stats regarding your comments about what readers are most likely to be looking for on Talk:Seattle Sounders#Re-requested move. Cheers, Number 57 08:25, 19 October 2011 (UTC)
Vandalism?
A bit harsh, no? Clicked the wrong button?--Terrillja talk 15:00, 20 October 2011 (UTC)
- It was probably more out of line with our guidelines and MoS than actual vandalism. But using capslock while disregarding sources is enough for me to not feel too bad about labeling it vandalism. Cptnono (talk) 18:45, 20 October 2011 (UTC)
|
Cookies! | |
|
Walter Görlitz has given you some cookies! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. You can spread the "WikiLove" by giving someone else some cookies, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.
To spread the goodness of cookies, you can add {{subst:Cookies}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{subst:munch}}! |
New Page Patrol survey
 New page patrol – Survey Invitation Hello Cptnono! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you.
Please click HERE to take part. You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey |
WikiCup 2011 October newsletter
The 2011 WikiCup is now over, and our new champion is 
Hurricanehink (submissions), who joins the exclusive club of the previous winners: Dreamafter (2007), jj137 (2008), Durova (2009) and Sturmvogel_66 (2010). The final standings were as follows:
- Hurricanehink (submissions)
Sp33dyphil (submissions)
Yellow Evan (submissions)
Miyagawa (submissions)
Wizardman (submissions)
Casliber (submissions)
Resolute (submissions)
PresN (submissions)
Prizes for first, second, third and fourth will be awarded, as will prizes for all those who reached the final eight. Every participant who scored in the competition will receive a ribbon of participation. In addition to the prizes based on placement, the following special prizes will be awarded based on high performance in particular areas of content creation. So that the finalists do not have an undue advantage, the prize is awarded to the competitor who scored the highest in any particular field in a single round.
- The Featured Article Award: Casliber (submissions), for his performance in round 2. Hurricanehink (submissions) matched the score, but Casliber won the tiebreaker.
- The Good Article Award: Yellow Evan (submissions), for his performance in round 4.
- The Featured List Award: Miyagawa (submissions), for his performance in round 4. PresN (submissions) matched the score, but Miyagawa won the tiebreaker.
- The Recognised Topic Award (for good and featured topics): PresN (submissions), for his performance in round 3.
- The Did You Know Award:
The Bushranger (submissions), for his performance in round 1. - The In the News Award:
Candlewicke (submissions), for his performance in round 1. - The Reviewer Award (for good article reviews): Wizardman (submissions), for his performance in round 3.
No prize was awarded for featured pictures, sounds or portals, as none were claimed throughout the competition. The awards will be handed out over the next few days. Congratulations to all our participants, and especially our winners; we've all had fun, and Misplaced Pages has benefitted massively from our content work.
Preparation for next year's WikiCup is ongoing. Interested parties are invited to sign up and participate in our straw polls. It's been a pleasure to work with you all this year, and, whoever's taking part in and running the competition in 2012, we hope to see you all in January! J Milburn and The ed17 00:36, 1 November 2011 (UTC)
2011 WikiCup participation
It was good to have you on board this time around- we hope you enjoyed the competition! In case you are interested, signups for next year are open. Thanks, J Milburn and The ed17 20:50, 2 November 2011 (UTC)
Walken
Awww, that's disappointing but I understand your reasoning, especially about the copyvio stuff. I wasn't too sure myself about the reliability of YT in this case, obviously, but I hated seeing all those names with "citation needed" after every single one. It bothered me, I'm not sure why. I probably should have done in the first place what you eventually did. Thanks for letting me know you were taking them out.
p.s. what are your thoughts on removing that first paragraph in the "Popularity and Imitators" section? I asked on the Walken talkpage but so far have no takers. --Ella Plantagenet (talk) 22:50, 8 November 2011 (UTC)
WP:ELNO
Read it before being a dickhead. -Nathan Johnson (talk) 17:03, 14 November 2011 (UTC)
Warning
I reverted your vandalism to User:William M. Connolley that you did in this edit. Don't do that again. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 04:43, 17 November 2011 (UTC)
Ditto re this edit to the same user's talk page. ScottyBerg (talk) 15:16, 17 November 2011 (UTC)
Don't let anything stop you!
|
Pacific Falafel |
| Thank you for going the extra mile to improve this project, even if it means saying "fuck it" ;) AgadaUrbanit (talk) 06:24, 22 November 2011 (UTC) |
- Holy shit. That is next to the 9lb Hammer (Airport S and Vale S). Bar full of train kids that turns into a biker haunt at night. Also has a rotating selection of pinball and arcade games. And if you turn around from where that picture is taken, there is a punk club. (Airport S and Doris S). Thanks for making me hungry, dude!
- What a surprise, 9lb Hammer @ Georgetown. There is always an oven roasted turkey if you're hungry. Happy Thanksgiving! Stay well. AgadaUrbanit (talk) 07:09, 22 November 2011 (UTC)
- Nice. A free Palestine protest dropped by my bus stop after a handful of thirst quenching beverages the other day. I kept my hammer in my toolbox.
- What a surprise, 9lb Hammer @ Georgetown. There is always an oven roasted turkey if you're hungry. Happy Thanksgiving! Stay well. AgadaUrbanit (talk) 07:09, 22 November 2011 (UTC)
Deletion/Bradden Inman
With regards to the Bradden Inman deletion, I should mention that I use the Twinkle add-on to nominate pages for deletion and it's the one that notifies users about deletion discussions. However, in this particular case, I don't think it worked properly since this is the second message I receive with regards to that particular deletion about failing to follow procedure. I apologize for that, I guess I should manually checked to see if it did everything it was supposed to. I've just never had any problems with it in the past so I didn't really think of doing that. Anyways, hopefully there's no hard feelings, I definitely wasn't looking to keep you or any other editor out of the loop. Take care. TonyStarks (talk) 10:52, 27 November 2011 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
|
The Barnstar of Good Humor |
| You know that you deserve it:) Shrike (talk) 08:00, 4 December 2011 (UTC) |
- Wait for it...Cptnono (talk) 08:01, 4 December 2011 (UTC)
mmmmm I quote, "You are welcome to provide sources and edit the article. That is the point of Misplaced Pages and no one would object. Fuck your face palm, though. See: Misplaced Pages:Five pillars and Misplaced Pages:Identifying reliable sources. Then feel like a pretentious jerk for facepalming something you could have fixed yourself if you were not so lazy. Cptnono (talk) 07:33, 7 December 2011 (UTC)"
Most original contributors prefer to edit their own material after a critique; this is why I did not edit your contribution. As for your language and good humour, I shall pass. 85.78.91.138 (talk) 07:52, 7 December 2011 (UTC)
Your point?
Nazi chicks were also hot. Just because they are hot does not mean they aren't evil anti-Semitic subhumans. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Thecleverscreenname (talk • contribs) 09:09, 4 December 2011 (UTC)
- I cannot comment on arms that look like sausages since it would be a BLP violation. But I can comment on Nazi chicks, black chicks, Persian chicks, ginger chicks, chicks with cleft lips (damn that is an easy fix that everyone in the free world should support), crack whores, MILFs, and God knows what else is under the skirt. I don't discriminate when it comes to pretty girls. And we should also be careful about being sexist.
Curious
Why did 4chan have it out for you? Your protection logs were 6 long lines of my history so how could I not get curious? Alatari (talk) 02:27, 8 December 2011 (UTC)
- I am under the impression that it was based off making a neutral/almost-supporting comment about a pro-Palestinian editor instead of the usual.Cptnono (talk) 04:01, 8 December 2011 (UTC)
4chan is anti-Palestine? I got the impression they were anarchists and freedom supporters so now I'm confused. That was an excellent photo you had up; when and where was it taken? Alatari (talk) 05:15, 8 December 2011 (UTC)
- It is easy to incite a crowd regardless of the politics involved. 4chan also does not have any politics. Less than a handful of individuals joined the "raid" but someone attempted to start one. The picture was found on Flickr. It is amazing what you can do with the Flickr2commons bot. The file should have the info you are looking for. Cptnono (talk) 05:21, 8 December 2011 (UTC)
- So now I wonder if it was you telling a 15 yo boy not to say a girl looks 'rapable' like that one edit summary said, that you thought a Palestinian was 'hawt' or that Palestinians 'shouldn't' protest Israel or that Israel 'sucks'... I got in a confrontation in an online game with some young dude because of the 'rape' angle and me saying it's never OK to talk about rape in a positive manner so my money's on that. Anyway, hold tuff! Alatari (talk) 11:59, 8 December 2011 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Georgetown Brewing Company
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Georgetown Brewing Company requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Mtking 04:21, 11 December 2011 (UTC)
- What's your favorite thing about Georgetown Brewing Company? Probably oversized operable sliding doors design of their new office. AgadaUrbanit (talk) 08:21, 11 December 2011 (UTC)
AE
The recent AE thread concerning yourself and Nableezy has been closed. This is not a formal enforcement action, but the consensus was that you should be advised to take greater care to avoid Nableezy in accordance with your interaction ban—in particular, please take care, where practical, to avoid articles where he is active and take particular care not to get into edit wars in which he has been involved. Again, this is not an enforcement action, but you should consider yourself so advised as of this message. Thanks, HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 01:40, 14 December 2011 (UTC)