Misplaced Pages

User talk:DangerousPanda: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 04:29, 29 January 2012 view sourceFloquenbeam (talk | contribs)Administrators38,357 edits Block: note← Previous edit Revision as of 11:34, 29 January 2012 view source DangerousPanda (talk | contribs)38,827 edits Block: tnksNext edit →
Line 145: Line 145:
:if its possible go ahead and block in I am no longer able to carry on and would like to be off wiki for the forseable. If the account isn't blocked I will return and it's clear I dont have the mental well being at this time to support it. :if its possible go ahead and block in I am no longer able to carry on and would like to be off wiki for the forseable. If the account isn't blocked I will return and it's clear I dont have the mental well being at this time to support it.
::BWilkins, FYI I've set EW's wikibreak enforcer for 3 months, so this should be resolved. --] (]) 04:29, 29 January 2012 (UTC) ::BWilkins, FYI I've set EW's wikibreak enforcer for 3 months, so this should be resolved. --] (]) 04:29, 29 January 2012 (UTC)
::: Thanks Floquenbeam. I have to say that I'm still scratching my head because I am totally unable to see any behaviour toward E-W that could be construed as harassment, or serious enough to cause such angst. If I could find it, I'd totally deal with it ... but IMHO it's not there ... (]<span style="border:1px solid black;">'''&nbsp;]&nbsp;'''</span>]) 11:34, 29 January 2012 (UTC)

Revision as of 11:34, 29 January 2012

Note: please do not use talkback {{tb}} templates here unless you are referring to discussion areas that I have not yet been a part of; I do monitor my conversations
This is DangerousPanda's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments.
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15Auto-archiving period: 15 days 

Merry X'mas~!

"And the angel said unto them, Fear not: for, behold,

I bring you good tidings of great joy, which shall be to all people.

For unto you is born this day in the city of David a Saviour, which is Christ the Lord."

Luke 2:10-11 (King James Version)

Dave is wishing you a Merry Christmas.

This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove.


Spread the cheer by adding {{Subst:Xmas4}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Ani

I've give up on the ANI thread as in just getting angry about being treated badly. Could you answer if it's possible as I asked at ANI for an interaction ban. Edinburgh Wanderer 13:30, 12 January 2012 (UTC)

There's no need for anything as radical as an interaction ban. The two of you got off on the wrong foot. You both got your backs up. Back away, breathe, relax, and go back to doing what you usually do - just take that one minor piece of advice with you. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 13:41, 12 January 2012 (UTC)
Even still i don't want him going on my talk page again. He is only doing it to wind me up and I'm not wanting it. After that i trust the page will be being watched more anyway so if he does it its not my problem. It just upsets me that the political motive and attacks happened. If they hadn't started i was going to have a look for sources to try and sort it to not be blp but he did before i had the chance. i thought my link to blp and saying there was merit to include the information neutrally was enough. Im going to ask igloos created to see if its possible to add an option for not giving warnings as you can't at the moment it automatically does. A hand written note would have been more appropriate. The political aspects including his user page and the mention of press involvement on the article talk page and the fact he says i called him a sock puppet which i never does concern me but I've explained that in the ani so that always there for the future.Edinburgh Wanderer 13:55, 12 January 2012 (UTC)
Ask him nicely not to post on your page anymore. If he continues to do so maliciously, let me know. You already know that's how it works - no need for anything official at the moment (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 14:22, 12 January 2012 (UTC)
I have left him a note and posted one final question at ANI whether or not he will reply is another matter. I will not be watching him or article so unless he posts on my talk page it's someone else's problem if this happens again. Can I thank you again you've successfully calmed me down a bit. Just hope he dosent do it again to anyone. Edinburgh Wanderer 18:05, 12 January 2012 (UTC)

TVFAN24

Talking here so that I don't disrupt a truly muddled talk page. I'd just like to note that he has been adhering to 1RR: he just makes the exact same edit every week, despite it getting instantly reverted every time he makes it. Slow-motion edit warring isn't helped by 1RR restrictions.—Kww(talk) 15:41, 15 January 2012 (UTC)

Unblock Restrictions

Is that box you use one you are coding by hand? It would seem a template for those would be in order, many times I've put similar unblock restrictions in place and then the restriction gets archived or removed from the talk page and no one knows it was in place. --WGFinley (talk) 17:28, 15 January 2012 (UTC)

Did it by hand ... is there a formal box available? (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 17:31, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
Nope, I think it would make a good template. --WGFinley (talk) 18:39, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
*grin* ... and you know how much I love making templates! (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 18:45, 15 January 2012 (UTC)

Hey Bwilkins. Thank you again. I will not let you down. I have a quick question there is an article where an editor linked two names that don't have a page, so it is a red link. Without any trouble may I unlink those two becuase they don't have a page anyway?? Thanks. TVFAN24 (talk) 17:52, 15 January 2012 (UTC)

See WP:REDLINKS ... so, in short, no ... no real need to remove the wikilinks for the most part (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 18:44, 15 January 2012 (UTC)

Hello Bwilkins, Regarding Page: Mohammad Nashir

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

Unfortunately I do not agree with you in this situation.

If you read my complacent comment I mention where you can find the further noteworthy sources, in addition to this underneath the page there were many references and sources available, I feel your arguament was very flawed and you are directly intentionally not placing my page up.

I kindly request that there is no reason not to place up the page and you put up the page.

As I said before please contact me if you need further sources to justify my argument.

I feel you have not treated me fairly in this case and you have deliberately not placed my page up.

Please kindly place the page up.

Thank you, — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tw3ak1t (talkcontribs) 22:54, 19 January 2012 (UTC)

You're welcome to try and create a WP:USERSPACEDRAFT, but the article as it was is unsalvageable from a notability and BLP perspective, as stated on WP:REFUND. It cannot be undeleted. If you do decide to create a draft, please read WP:FIRSTARTICLE, and do not move it into articlespace until you have verified with a few trusted people that it actually meets Misplaced Pages's requirements for inclusion. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 00:12, 20 January 2012 (UTC)


Thank you for your advice, I appreciate you overlooking my previous submissions, I have submitted a new draft, please could you kindly look at it and see what could be changed, or if it is ok for submission.

Yours... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tw3ak1t (talkcontribs)

None of the "references" are permissible on Misplaced Pages - they're blogs, and user-editable sites. Even the text of the article shows he's not a notable person whatsoever. When someone merely "claims" to do something, it's unacceptable. Starting a non-notable club or society = non-notable. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 01:59, 20 January 2012 (UTC)
Poetry Comments - Mohammad Nashir Hi again, I suggest reading this enclosed website for others comments on his work, it is mainly positive and very well-known. If you find out more about the University of Sheffield Afghanistan Society which closed on January 2012, it was supported by many diverse organisations including Shell Petrol, University of Cambridge and BBC Persian TV. The fact he has outlined this on his website does not mean he is not notable, it only means that he is further trying to explain the organisations he has worked in.
Of course there are blogs, but these are just for personal purposes, if you see his Academic Society and Amazon pieces they have contributed a lot if you only read the pieces. In addition The Academic Society is new so there is not much substance to call it very notable, however it has highly generated interest, however his previous organisation The Afghanistan Society - The University of Sheffield has helped the Afghan people and his talks has enabled the Afghan people in Sheffield and nationwide in the UK to voice their opinions on Afghanistan.
I think your association with 'notable' is very muddled, I would say that notable in these areas of helping Afghanistan, promotional work for Afghanistan and his contributions in Academia and Research is notable.
Once again please visit that link and find others comments on his work.
Here is another example of his notability, A blog account of a seperate person on Mohammad Nashir's poetry.
Here is his worldwide credibility on a Portuguese website of his poetry Portuguese Account of his Poetry
This explains his poetry on one of his poems called 'London Baby' in a positive light.
I hope this satisfies you for evidence.
May I also say that, I have so many sources on individuals commenting on his work and placing his work on their blogs and websites, it would be difficult to keep track.
Here is another source where his poetry is stored for a Russian (.ru) website - Some of Mohammad's Poetry on a Russian Website
In addition under the publisher Forward Poetry Press Ltd he has published 3 of his poems and he has published in the renknowned British poetry publisher, he is not only self-published, you can ask the organisation if he is published there, you can also contact United Press Ltd about his publications there in the UK and additionally The Pen magazine in the US.

Thanks.

Tw3ak1t (talk) 15:33, 20 January 2012 (UTC)

This will be the last time I try to say this (ensure you click EVERY link that I provide you): general notability guidelines, reliable sources, self-published authors. Most importantly the one on reliable sources. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 18:39, 20 January 2012 (UTC)
Apologies if I frustrated you, I have re-referenced the sources in the Misplaced Pages page as a draft, please take a look if it is Okay, I appreciate your patience. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tw3ak1t (talkcontribs) 21:27, 20 January 2012 (UTC)
I'm going to start commenting on the talkpage of the draft, rather than continue this here. For my friendly tps's, the draft is here (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 11:42, 21 January 2012 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

IPBE

Hello, what template do I use if I need an IP block exception. aviyal want's water 23:38, 21 January 2012 (UTC)

See WP:IPBE (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 11:07, 22 January 2012 (UTC)
(edit conflict)(talk page stalker)Send an e-Mail to these people. That should solve your problem.—cyberpower (Chat)(WP Edits: 511,870,599) 11:20, 22 January 2012 (UTC)

University Canada West

I'd already started a discussion on the topic. Could you comment there? --Ronz (talk) 18:10, 23 January 2012 (UTC)

Name-calling

false accusations of name-calling, specifically "Asshats" and "Idiots", from me to Jasper Deng and/or Elen of Roads, which I never did, and would never do - this from the editor you said was "polite", in comparison to me. Wonderful. Sorry, it's really abusive, I really do not want to sit and "take it". (Or, is that expected of me?) It's amazing. Do you still think this new editor is polite by comparison? I've asked him to check his facts, and support the violent accusations, or apologize. I suppose I'm being unreasonable in that! My god. Ihardlythinkso (talk) 05:36, 24 January 2012 (UTC)

User:Bwilkins, thanks for your explanations at ANI regarding personal attack, uncivil, libel & slander. (It was informative.) Just so you know, I was using the common dictionary definition, not legal meaning, re word "slander" ("false and malicious statement injurious to a person's reputation"). In this case, "WP userid" (not necessarily "person"). Ok, thx. Ihardlythinkso (talk) 00:13, 25 January 2012 (UTC)

WP:BOOMERANG, WP:CANVASSING. Already brought up to WP:ANI.Jasper Deng (talk) 05:39, 24 January 2012 (UTC)

Creativity

Hi BWilkins, I'm not sure that block is going to calm things down. AniMate had a word with him about it already, he apologized to AniMate on User talk:AniMate for it, and hasn't repeated it since. I don't think it's preventing anything. Please consider unblocking to minimize the uproar. --Floquenbeam (talk) 00:47, 25 January 2012 (UTC)

He was warned last week by me not to do it. To see him do it again ... (it has been escalating all week) shows me differently. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 00:50, 25 January 2012 (UTC)
Ah, I was unaware of the previous warning. --Floquenbeam (talk) 00:51, 25 January 2012 (UTC)
Good block. If I had known about the previous warning I would have blocked him myself. AniMate 02:59, 25 January 2012 (UTC)
It was here which they removed here. You can see my justification for a "first" warning being a "final" warning there. Gotta love the principle that "a removed warning = a read warning". (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 13:32, 25 January 2012 (UTC)

Hello

That attitude. I dropped the issue since the user calls my sources as unofficial, in order to avoid the edit wars but behaving in this manner with other users is certainly not a part of Misplaced Pages's policies. Please have a look at it, I'll really appreciate the help. Thank you ♫♪AdyNiz♪♫ 06:45, 28 January 2012 (UTC)

The ANI debate RE: Attacks and Socks

Hi Bwilkins, Firstly, I hope I wasn't stepping out of line by adding some common-sense to the debate at Misplaced Pages:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Personal_attacks_and_socking. I don't even know how and when I got ANI flagged on my watchlist, but I had watched that debate, and noticed that it was getting out of hand. Fingers-crossed the 2 individuals involved can find a resolution to all this. An edit conflict occurred though just as you closed the thread. I marked up my statement as EC. That is fine isn't it? Anyhow, hope the rest of your day becomes more cheerful and less stressing. Take care, and happy editing! Wesley Mouse (talk) 16:25, 28 January 2012 (UTC)

I have removed the auto-unblock request from my talk page.

I am sending this message to all the people who have commented on my unblock request at User Talk:12bigbrother12#Caught in an Autoblock. I've removed the request because I have moved back out to university, where I have a different IP address and so am not affected by the block. I will be going back to my old (home) IP address in March where hopefully the situation should have resolved itself. Thank you for taking the time to deal with my request, If for whatever reason I'm not allowed to remove the unblock request I apologise and obviously feel free to revert the edit I made on my talk page. Thanks again. 12bigbrother12 (talk) 20:10, 28 January 2012 (UTC)

Block

If you ask an admin to block you are they allowed to do it. I'm seriously thinking thats the best option. I'm getting riled by other editors and it won't be long before I snap completely. I'm sick of people goading me it's childish and I always seem to get drawn in by it and end up fighting back it's doing my mental health no good at all I'm extremely stressed out Ive done so much hard work but its only a matter of time before i lose it. The spi turned into a farce because murry had small digs and got to me. He may not be porridge but he has got to me. I seriously think a block is the best option or are there other non admin ways to block your own account it's for the best. Edinburgh Wanderer 02:09, 29 January 2012 (UTC)

if its possible go ahead and block in I am no longer able to carry on and would like to be off wiki for the forseable. If the account isn't blocked I will return and it's clear I dont have the mental well being at this time to support it.
BWilkins, FYI I've set EW's wikibreak enforcer for 3 months, so this should be resolved. --Floquenbeam (talk) 04:29, 29 January 2012 (UTC)
Thanks Floquenbeam. I have to say that I'm still scratching my head because I am totally unable to see any behaviour toward E-W that could be construed as harassment, or serious enough to cause such angst. If I could find it, I'd totally deal with it ... but IMHO it's not there ... (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 11:34, 29 January 2012 (UTC)