| Revision as of 01:42, 24 January 2012 editTedder (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Administrators62,278 edits Caution: Removal of content, blanking on Satyricon nightclub. (TW)← Previous edit | Revision as of 02:33, 30 January 2012 edit undoJohnny Squeaky (talk | contribs)2,359 edits →January 2012Next edit → | ||
| Line 42: | Line 42: | ||
| == January 2012 == | == January 2012 == | ||
| ] Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Misplaced Pages, as you did to ], without giving a valid reason for the removal in the ]. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been ]. Please make use of the ] if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-delete2 --> ] (]) 01:42, 24 January 2012 (UTC) | ] Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Misplaced Pages, as you did to ], without giving a valid reason for the removal in the ]. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been ]. Please make use of the ] if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-delete2 --> ] (]) 01:42, 24 January 2012 (UTC) | ||
| :More blather from Wikilawyers who have no other life but to ] anything they can. =//= ] 02:33, 30 January 2012 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 02:33, 30 January 2012
Whisper Systems
I reverted an edit of yours that removed a decent source for the page above. I'm not sure why you thought it was irrelevant, as you said in your edit summary; the independent source clearly identifies the company and provides some information about why Twitter was interested in acquiring them. Please be more careful when removing information based on sourced content. I, Jethrobot (note: not a bot!) 06:55, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
- The Misplaced Pages story is about Whisper Systems, not one or a handfull of their possibly 100,000 of users. As well, it's POV, politically. Can-o-worms. By the way, I have ZERO interest in "WikiLawyering". =//= Johnny Squeaky 19:04, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
Bias of AFD debate - Florence Brudenell-Bruce
I have reverted your unhelpful edit of the article Florence Brudenell-Bruce which is currently under an AFD debate. If you had read the rules of WP:AFD, you would have noticed that such large edits while an AFD debate is ongoing as not seen as at all productive to the debate, and are in fact highly disruptive. Rgds, --Trident13 (talk) 01:06, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
- Why is it that some "editors" here feel the need to be SOOOO RUDE? There are many theories... =//= Johnny Squeaky 03:06, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
- The above editor wasn't being rude at all, and their claim that your edit was "not seen as at all productive" is actually a very nice way of putting it. Please don't cry foul when no foul is committed. Drmies (talk) 02:20, 27 December 2011 (UTC)
- Please find "more productive" things to do other than commenting on my talk page! =//= Johnny Squeaky 07:27, 27 December 2011 (UTC)
- Yes massa. Now you please play nice and stop being disruptive. Drmies (talk) 03:21, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
- I'm sorry that you feel that our disagreement is a suitable reason to assault me with offensive racist attacks that many people would consider hate speech (and from an "administrator" no less - that says a lot about Misplaced Pages). On the other hand, thank you for illustrating my point so much more perfectly than I ever could! Case closed! =//= Johnny Squeaky 17:42, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
- Yes massa. Now you please play nice and stop being disruptive. Drmies (talk) 03:21, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
- Please find "more productive" things to do other than commenting on my talk page! =//= Johnny Squeaky 07:27, 27 December 2011 (UTC)
- The above editor wasn't being rude at all, and their claim that your edit was "not seen as at all productive" is actually a very nice way of putting it. Please don't cry foul when no foul is committed. Drmies (talk) 02:20, 27 December 2011 (UTC)
Merry Christmas!
|
Happy new year! |
| we wish you a merry christmas and a happy new year! Pass a Method talk 20:12, 25 December 2011 (UTC) |
Disambiguation link notification
Hi. When you recently edited Jacques Pépin, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Howard Johnson (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:58, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
Barnstar
|
The Original Barnstar | |
| This barnstar is awarded to everyone who - whatever their opinion - contributed to the discussion about Misplaced Pages and SOPA. Thank you for being a part of the discussion. Presented by the Wikimedia Foundation. |
unexplained deletions at Satyricon nightclub
Welcome to Misplaced Pages. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Satyricon nightclub. When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.—EncMstr (talk) 21:26, 23 January 2012 (UTC)
January 2012
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Misplaced Pages, as you did to Satyricon nightclub, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. tedder (talk) 01:42, 24 January 2012 (UTC)
- More blather from Wikilawyers who have no other life but to WP:OWN anything they can. =//= Johnny Squeaky 02:33, 30 January 2012 (UTC)