Misplaced Pages

The Exodus: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 10:54, 14 March 2012 view sourceIZAK (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, File movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers86,943 edits make this more orderly because this reads like OR based on secular thinkesr without regard for Judaism's or Christainity's point of view that are relagated to the junk heap← Previous edit Revision as of 12:00, 14 March 2012 view source Dominus Vobisdu (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users8,436 edits When discusssing history, we use academic viewpoint.Next edit →
Line 2: Line 2:
{{About|the events related in the Torah||Exodus (disambiguation){{!}}Exodus}} {{About|the events related in the Torah||Exodus (disambiguation){{!}}Exodus}}
], 1829]] ], 1829]]
'''The Exodus''' (] {{lang|grc|], ''exodos'' "way out"}}, {{Hebrew Name|יציאת מצרים|Yetsi'at Mitzrayim|{{IPA-he|jəsʕijaθ misʕɾajim|}} Y'ṣiʾath Miṣrayim|"the exit from Egypt"}}) is the story of the departure of the ] from ] described in the ].
Narrowly defined, the term refers only to the departure from Egypt described in the ]; more widely, it takes in the subsequent law-givings and wanderings in the wilderness between Egypt and Canaan described in the books of ], ] and ].


There is overwhelming archaeological evidence that the origins of Israel were in fact largely Canaanite, leaving, in the words of archaeologist ], "no room for an Exodus from Egypt or a 40-year pilgrimage through the Sinai wilderness."{{sfn|Dever|2001|p=99}} The modern scholarly consensus is that there was never any exodus of the proportions described in the Bible,{{sfn|Walton|2003|p=258}} and that the story is best seen as theology instead of history, illustrating how the ] acted to save and strengthen his chosen people.{{sfn|Redmount|1998|p=64}}
'''The Exodus''' (] {{lang|grc|], ''exodos'' "way out"}}, {{Hebrew Name|יציאת מצרים|Yetsi'at Mitzrayim|{{IPA-he|jəsʕijaθ misʕɾajim|}} Y'ṣiʾath Miṣrayim|" exit Egypt"}}) is the story of the departure of the ] from ] described in the ].
A common hypothesis among biblical scholars today is that the first major comprehensive draft of the exodus story was composed in the late 7th or the 6th century BC and later expanded into a work very like the one we have now.{{sfn|Davies|2001|p=37}}

Narrowly defined, the term refers only to the departure from Egypt described in the ]; more widely, it takes in the subsequent law-givings and wanderings in the wilderness between Egypt and Canaan described in the books of ], ] and ].


==Summary== ==Summary==
Line 20: Line 21:


==Origins of the Exodus story== ==Origins of the Exodus story==
===Biblical background=== ===Possible historical background===
While the story in the books of Exodus, Numbers and Deuteronomy is the best-known account of the Exodus, there are over a hundred and fifty references scattered through the Bible.{{sfn|Russell|2009|p=1}} The earliest mentions are in the prophets ] (possibly) and ] (certainly), both active in 8th century Israel; in contrast ] and ], both active in Judah at much the same time, never do; it thus seems reasonable to conclude that the Exodus tradition was important in the northern kingdom in the 8th century, but not in Judah.{{sfn|Lenche|1985|p=327}} While the story in the books of Exodus, Numbers and Deuteronomy is the best-known account of the Exodus, there are over a hundred and fifty references scattered through the Bible.{{sfn|Russell|2009|p=1}} The earliest mentions are in the prophets ] (possibly) and ] (certainly), both active in 8th century Israel; in contrast ] and ], both active in Judah at much the same time, never do; it thus seems reasonable to conclude that the Exodus tradition was important in the northern kingdom in the 8th century, but not in Judah.{{sfn|Lenche|1985|p=327}}


===Secular academic theories===
====Theories of Stephen C. Russell====
In a recent work, Stephen C. Russell traces the 8th century prophetic tradition to three originally separate variants, in the northern ], in Trans-Jordan, and in the southern ]. Russell proposes different hypothetical historical backgrounds to each tradition: the tradition from Israel, which involves a journey from Egypt to the region of Bethel, he suggests is a memory of herders who could move to and from Egypt in times of crisis; for the Trans-Jordanian tradition, which focuses on deliverance from Egypt without a journey, he suggests a memory of the withdrawal of Egyptian control at the end of the Late Bronze Age; and for Judah, whose tradition is preserved in the ], he suggests the celebration of a military victory over Egypt, although it is impossible to suggest what this victory may have been.{{sfn|Russell|2009|p=1}} In a recent work, Stephen C. Russell traces the 8th century prophetic tradition to three originally separate variants, in the northern ], in Trans-Jordan, and in the southern ]. Russell proposes different hypothetical historical backgrounds to each tradition: the tradition from Israel, which involves a journey from Egypt to the region of Bethel, he suggests is a memory of herders who could move to and from Egypt in times of crisis; for the Trans-Jordanian tradition, which focuses on deliverance from Egypt without a journey, he suggests a memory of the withdrawal of Egyptian control at the end of the Late Bronze Age; and for Judah, whose tradition is preserved in the ], he suggests the celebration of a military victory over Egypt, although it is impossible to suggest what this victory may have been.{{sfn|Russell|2009|p=1}}


====Theories of William Denver and others==== ===How the Biblical story was written===
There is reportedly rchaeological evidence that the origins of Israel were in fact largely Canaanite, leaving, in the words of archaeologist ], "no room for an Exodus from Egypt or a 40-year pilgrimage through the Sinai wilderness."{{sfn|Dever|2001|p=99}} The modern scholarly consensus is that there was never any exodus of the proportions described in the Bible,{{sfn|Walton|2003|p=258}} and that the story is best seen as theology instead of history, illustrating how the ] acted to save and strengthen his chosen people.{{sfn|Redmount|1998|p=64}}
A common hypothesis among biblical scholars today is that the first major comprehensive draft of the exodus story was composed in the late 7th or the 6th century BC and later expanded into a work very like the one we have now.{{sfn|Davies|2001|p=37}}


===Secular theories about how the story was written===
There are currently a number of competing theories on the composition of the four books Exodus-Leviticus-Numbers-Deuteronomy, and they can be grouped into three broad "models". The first, the ], proposes that the four books (actually five - the models include Genesis) were originally four separate documents, treating the same subject (i.e. the Exodus) written at various times between the 9th and 6th centuries BC and combined about 450 BC. This theory dominated biblical scholarship from the late 19th century to the 1970s. The second, the "supplementary" model, had been popular before the documentary hypothesis dominated the field and has re-emerged since the 1970s. It holds that that there was a single original document which was then expanded by "supplements", again with the end product emerging around 450 BC. The third, the "fragmentary" model, proposes that the four books were combined by a single author from a host of "fragments", meaning small texts as well as oral traditions (sagas and folk-tales), again c.450 BC. There are currently a number of competing theories on the composition of the four books Exodus-Leviticus-Numbers-Deuteronomy, and they can be grouped into three broad "models". The first, the ], proposes that the four books (actually five - the models include Genesis) were originally four separate documents, treating the same subject (i.e. the Exodus) written at various times between the 9th and 6th centuries BC and combined about 450 BC. This theory dominated biblical scholarship from the late 19th century to the 1970s. The second, the "supplementary" model, had been popular before the documentary hypothesis dominated the field and has re-emerged since the 1970s. It holds that that there was a single original document which was then expanded by "supplements", again with the end product emerging around 450 BC. The third, the "fragmentary" model, proposes that the four books were combined by a single author from a host of "fragments", meaning small texts as well as oral traditions (sagas and folk-tales), again c.450 BC.


The most recent ideas on the origin of the five books place Deuteronomy in the late 7th century with a revised version in the 6th, and the other four books in the ] period of the 5th century. It is generally agreed that the Exodus tradition behind the five books predates the narrative as told in Exodus, Numbers and Deuteronomy (since it also appears in the 8th century prophets), but there is no consensus on just what might lie behind the tradition. The most recent ideas on the origin of the five books place Deuteronomy in the late 7th century with a revised version in the 6th, and the other four books in the ] period of the 5th century. It is generally agreed that the Exodus tradition behind the five books predates the narrative as told in Exodus, Numbers and Deuteronomy (since it also appears in the 8th century prophets), but there is no consensus on just what might lie behind the tradition.


===Ongoing debate=== ==Historicity debate==
{{pov-section|date=February 2012}} {{pov-section|date=February 2012}}
The consensus among biblical scholars today is that there was never any exodus of the proportions described in the Bible,{{sfn|Walton|2003|p=258}} and that the story is best seen as theology, a story illustrating how the ] acted to save and strengthen his chosen people, and not as history.{{sfn|Redmount|1998|p=64}} Nevertheless, the discussion of the historical reality of the exodus has a long history, and continues to attract attention. The consensus among biblical scholars today is that there was never any exodus of the proportions described in the Bible,{{sfn|Walton|2003|p=258}} and that the story is best seen as theology, a story illustrating how the ] acted to save and strengthen his chosen people, and not as history.{{sfn|Redmount|1998|p=64}} Nevertheless, the discussion of the historical reality of the exodus has a long history, and continues to attract attention.
Line 42: Line 38:
===Numbers and logistics=== ===Numbers and logistics===
According to ] 12:37-38, the Israelites numbered "about six hundred thousand men on foot, besides women and children," plus many non-Israelites and livestock.<ref></ref> ] 1:46 gives a more precise total of 603,550.<ref></ref> The 600,000, plus wives, children, the elderly, and the "mixed multitude" of non-Israelites would have numbered some 2 million people,{{sfn|Kantor|2005|p=70}} compared with an entire Egyptian population in 1250 BCE of around 3 to 3.5 million.{{sfn|Butzer|1999|p=297}} Marching ten abreast, and without accounting for livestock, they would have formed a line 150 miles long.{{sfn|Cline|2007|p=74}} According to ] 12:37-38, the Israelites numbered "about six hundred thousand men on foot, besides women and children," plus many non-Israelites and livestock.<ref></ref> ] 1:46 gives a more precise total of 603,550.<ref></ref> The 600,000, plus wives, children, the elderly, and the "mixed multitude" of non-Israelites would have numbered some 2 million people,{{sfn|Kantor|2005|p=70}} compared with an entire Egyptian population in 1250 BCE of around 3 to 3.5 million.{{sfn|Butzer|1999|p=297}} Marching ten abreast, and without accounting for livestock, they would have formed a line 150 miles long.{{sfn|Cline|2007|p=74}}

===Secular point of view===


No evidence has been found that indicates Egypt ever suffered such a demographic and economic catastrophe or that the Sinai desert ever hosted (or could have hosted) these millions of people and their herds.{{sfn|Dever|2003|p=19}} Some scholars have rationalised these numbers into smaller figures, for example reading the ] as "600 families" rather than 600,000 men, but all such solutions raise more problems than they solve.{{sfn|Grisanti|2011|p=240ff}} The view of mainstream modern biblical scholarship is that the improbability of the Exodus story originates because it was written not as history, but to demonstrate God's purpose and deeds with his ], Israel.{{sfn|Meyers|2005|p=5}} Thus it seems probable that the 603,550 people delivered from Egypt (according to Numbers 1:46) is not simply a number, but a ] (a code in which numbers represent letters or words) for ''bnei yisra'el kol rosh'', "the children of Israel, every individual;"{{sfn|Beitzel|1980|p=6-7}} while the number 600,000 symbolises the total destruction of the generation of Israel which left Egypt, none of whom lived to see the Promised Land.{{sfn|Guillaume|1980|p=8,15}} No evidence has been found that indicates Egypt ever suffered such a demographic and economic catastrophe or that the Sinai desert ever hosted (or could have hosted) these millions of people and their herds.{{sfn|Dever|2003|p=19}} Some scholars have rationalised these numbers into smaller figures, for example reading the ] as "600 families" rather than 600,000 men, but all such solutions raise more problems than they solve.{{sfn|Grisanti|2011|p=240ff}} The view of mainstream modern biblical scholarship is that the improbability of the Exodus story originates because it was written not as history, but to demonstrate God's purpose and deeds with his ], Israel.{{sfn|Meyers|2005|p=5}} Thus it seems probable that the 603,550 people delivered from Egypt (according to Numbers 1:46) is not simply a number, but a ] (a code in which numbers represent letters or words) for ''bnei yisra'el kol rosh'', "the children of Israel, every individual;"{{sfn|Beitzel|1980|p=6-7}} while the number 600,000 symbolises the total destruction of the generation of Israel which left Egypt, none of whom lived to see the Promised Land.{{sfn|Guillaume|1980|p=8,15}}

Revision as of 12:00, 14 March 2012

This article's lead section may be too short to adequately summarize the key points. Please consider expanding the lead to provide an accessible overview of all important aspects of the article. (March 2012)
This article is about the events related in the Torah. For other uses, see Exodus.
"Departure of the Israelites", by David Roberts, 1829

The Exodus (Greek ], exodos "way out"] Error: {{Lang}}: text has italic markup (help), Hebrew: יציאת מצרים, Modern: Yetsi'at Mitzrayim, Tiberian: Template:IPA-he Y'ṣiʾath Miṣrayim, "the exit from Egypt") is the story of the departure of the Israelites from ancient Egypt described in the Hebrew Bible. Narrowly defined, the term refers only to the departure from Egypt described in the Book of Exodus; more widely, it takes in the subsequent law-givings and wanderings in the wilderness between Egypt and Canaan described in the books of Leviticus, Numbers and Deuteronomy.

There is overwhelming archaeological evidence that the origins of Israel were in fact largely Canaanite, leaving, in the words of archaeologist William Dever, "no room for an Exodus from Egypt or a 40-year pilgrimage through the Sinai wilderness." The modern scholarly consensus is that there was never any exodus of the proportions described in the Bible, and that the story is best seen as theology instead of history, illustrating how the God of Israel acted to save and strengthen his chosen people. A common hypothesis among biblical scholars today is that the first major comprehensive draft of the exodus story was composed in the late 7th or the 6th century BC and later expanded into a work very like the one we have now.

Summary

See Exodus 13 and following chapters

The Book of Exodus tells how Moses leads the Israelites out of Egypt and through the wilderness to Mount Sinai, where God reveals himself and offers them a Covenant: they are to keep his torah (i.e. law, instruction), and in return he will be their God and give them the land of Canaan. The Book of Leviticus records the laws of God. The Book of Numbers tells how the Israelites, led now by their God, journey onwards from Sinai towards Canaan, but when their spies report that the land is filled with giants they refuse to go on. God then condemns them to remain in the desert until the generation that left Egypt passes away. After thirty-eight years at the oasis of Kadesh Barnea the next generation travel on to the borders of Canaan. The Book of Deuteronomy tells how, within sight of the Promised Land, Moses recalls their journeys and gives them new laws. His death (the last reported event of the Torah) concludes the 40 years of the exodus from Egypt.

Cultural significance

Main article: Passover

The exodus from Egypt is the theme of the Jewish festival of Passover. The Hebrew name for this, "Pesaḥ", refers to God's instruction to the Israelites to prepare unleavened bread as they would be leaving in haste, and to mark their doors with the blood of slaughtered sheep so that the "Angel" or "the destroyer" tasked with killing the first-born of Egypt would "pass over" them. (Despite the Exodus story, scholars believe that the passover festival originated not in the biblical story but as a magic ritual to turn away demons from the household by painting the doorframe with the blood of a slaughtered sheep.)

Jewish tradition has preserved national and personal reminders of this pivotal narrative in daily life. Examples include the wearing of tefilin (Jewish phylacteries) on the hand and forehead, the wearing of tzitzit (knotted ritual fringes attached to the four corners of the prayer shawl), the eating of matzot (unleavened bread) during the Pesach, the fasting of the firstborn a day before Pesach, and the redemption of firstborn children and animals.

Origins of the Exodus story

Possible historical background

While the story in the books of Exodus, Numbers and Deuteronomy is the best-known account of the Exodus, there are over a hundred and fifty references scattered through the Bible. The earliest mentions are in the prophets Amos (possibly) and Hosea (certainly), both active in 8th century Israel; in contrast Proto-Isaiah and Micah, both active in Judah at much the same time, never do; it thus seems reasonable to conclude that the Exodus tradition was important in the northern kingdom in the 8th century, but not in Judah.

In a recent work, Stephen C. Russell traces the 8th century prophetic tradition to three originally separate variants, in the northern kingdom of Israel, in Trans-Jordan, and in the southern kingdom of Judah. Russell proposes different hypothetical historical backgrounds to each tradition: the tradition from Israel, which involves a journey from Egypt to the region of Bethel, he suggests is a memory of herders who could move to and from Egypt in times of crisis; for the Trans-Jordanian tradition, which focuses on deliverance from Egypt without a journey, he suggests a memory of the withdrawal of Egyptian control at the end of the Late Bronze Age; and for Judah, whose tradition is preserved in the Song of the Sea, he suggests the celebration of a military victory over Egypt, although it is impossible to suggest what this victory may have been.

How the Biblical story was written

There are currently a number of competing theories on the composition of the four books Exodus-Leviticus-Numbers-Deuteronomy, and they can be grouped into three broad "models". The first, the documentary hypothesis, proposes that the four books (actually five - the models include Genesis) were originally four separate documents, treating the same subject (i.e. the Exodus) written at various times between the 9th and 6th centuries BC and combined about 450 BC. This theory dominated biblical scholarship from the late 19th century to the 1970s. The second, the "supplementary" model, had been popular before the documentary hypothesis dominated the field and has re-emerged since the 1970s. It holds that that there was a single original document which was then expanded by "supplements", again with the end product emerging around 450 BC. The third, the "fragmentary" model, proposes that the four books were combined by a single author from a host of "fragments", meaning small texts as well as oral traditions (sagas and folk-tales), again c.450 BC.

The most recent ideas on the origin of the five books place Deuteronomy in the late 7th century with a revised version in the 6th, and the other four books in the Persian period of the 5th century. It is generally agreed that the Exodus tradition behind the five books predates the narrative as told in Exodus, Numbers and Deuteronomy (since it also appears in the 8th century prophets), but there is no consensus on just what might lie behind the tradition.

Historicity debate

The neutrality of this section is disputed. Relevant discussion may be found on the talk page. Please do not remove this message until conditions to do so are met. (February 2012) (Learn how and when to remove this message)

The consensus among biblical scholars today is that there was never any exodus of the proportions described in the Bible, and that the story is best seen as theology, a story illustrating how the God of Israel acted to save and strengthen his chosen people, and not as history. Nevertheless, the discussion of the historical reality of the exodus has a long history, and continues to attract attention.

Numbers and logistics

According to Exodus 12:37-38, the Israelites numbered "about six hundred thousand men on foot, besides women and children," plus many non-Israelites and livestock. Numbers 1:46 gives a more precise total of 603,550. The 600,000, plus wives, children, the elderly, and the "mixed multitude" of non-Israelites would have numbered some 2 million people, compared with an entire Egyptian population in 1250 BCE of around 3 to 3.5 million. Marching ten abreast, and without accounting for livestock, they would have formed a line 150 miles long.

No evidence has been found that indicates Egypt ever suffered such a demographic and economic catastrophe or that the Sinai desert ever hosted (or could have hosted) these millions of people and their herds. Some scholars have rationalised these numbers into smaller figures, for example reading the Hebrew as "600 families" rather than 600,000 men, but all such solutions raise more problems than they solve. The view of mainstream modern biblical scholarship is that the improbability of the Exodus story originates because it was written not as history, but to demonstrate God's purpose and deeds with his Chosen People, Israel. Thus it seems probable that the 603,550 people delivered from Egypt (according to Numbers 1:46) is not simply a number, but a gematria (a code in which numbers represent letters or words) for bnei yisra'el kol rosh, "the children of Israel, every individual;" while the number 600,000 symbolises the total destruction of the generation of Israel which left Egypt, none of whom lived to see the Promised Land.

Archaeology

A century of research by archaeologists and Egyptologists has found no evidence which can be directly related to the Exodus captivity and the escape and travels through the wilderness, and most archaeologists have abandoned the archaeological investigation of Moses and the Exodus as "a fruitless pursuit". A number of theories have been put forward to account for the origins of the Israelites, and despite differing details they agree on Israel's Canaanite origins. The culture of the earliest Israelite settlements is Canaanite, their cult-objects are those of the Canaanite god El, the pottery remains in the local Canaanite tradition, and the alphabet used is early Canaanite, and almost the sole marker distinguishing the "Israelite" villages from Canaanite sites is an absence of pig bones, although whether even this is an ethnic marker or is due to other factors remains a matter of dispute.

Anachronisms

Several details point to a 1st millennium date for the Book of Exodus: Ezion-Geber, (one of the Stations of the Exodus), for example, dates to a period between the 8th and 6th centuries BC with possible further occupation into the 4th century BC, and those place-names on the Exodus route which have been identified - Goshen, Pithom, Succoth, Ramesses and Kadesh Barnea - point to the geography of the 1st millennium rather than the 2nd. Similarly, Pharaoh's fear that the Israelites might ally themselves with foreign invaders seems unlikely in the context of the late 2nd millennium, when Canaan was part of an Egyptian empire and Egypt faced no enemies in that direction, but does make sense in a 1st millennium context, when Egypt was considerably weaker and faced invasion first from the Persians and later from Seleucid Syria.

Chronology

The chronology of the Exodus story likewise underlines its essentially religious rather than historical nature. The number seven, for example, was sacred to God in Judaism, and so the Israelites arrive at Sinai, where they will meet God, at the beginning of the seventh week after their departure from Egypt, while the erection of the Tabernacle, God's dwelling-place among his people, occurs in the year 2666 after God creates the world, two-thirds of the way through a four thousand year era which culminates in or around the re-dedication of the Second Temple in 164 BCE.

Route and date

Main article: Stations list
Possible Exodus Routes. In black is the traditional Exodus route; other possible routes are in blue and green.

Route

The Torah lists the places where the Israelites rested. A few of the names at the start of the itinerary, including Ra'amses, Pithom and Succoth, are reasonably well identified with archaeological sites on the eastern edge of the Nile delta, as is Kadesh-Barnea, where the Israelites spend 38 years after turning back from Canaan, but other than that very little is certain. The crossing of the Red Sea has been variously placed at the Pelusic branch of the Nile, anywhere along the network of Bitter Lakes and smaller canals that formed a barrier toward eastward escape, the Gulf of Suez (SSE of Succoth) and the Gulf of Aqaba (S of Ezion-Geber), or even on a lagoon on the Mediterranean coast. The biblical Mt. Sinai is identified in Christian tradition with Jebel Musa in the south of the Sinai Peninsula, but this association dates only from the 3rd century AD and no evidence of the Exodus has been found there.

The most obvious routes for travelers through the region were the royal roads, the "king's highways" that had been in use for centuries and would continue in use for centuries to come. The Bible specifically denies that the Israelites went by the Way of the Philistines a northerly yet coastal route along the Mediterranean (the purple line on the map to the right indicates the Way of Shur which goes inland towards Shur, Asshur or Syria). The Arabian Trade Route (green) and the Way of Seir (black) are improbable routes, the former having the advantage of heading initially toward Kadesh-Barnea but swinging east towards Petra north of Aqaba/Eilat.

Date

Main article: Pharaoh of the Exodus

The Seder Olam Rabbah (ca. 2nd century AD) determines the commencement of the Exodus to 2448 AM (1313 BC). This date has become traditional in Rabbinic Judaism.

In the first half of the 20th century the Exodus was dated on the basis of 1 Kings 6:1, which states that the Exodus occurred 480 years before the construction of Solomon's Temple, the fourth year of Solomon's reign. Equating the biblical chronology with dates in history is notoriously difficult, but Edwin Thiele's widely accepted reconciliation of the reigns of the Israelite and Judahite kings would imply an Exodus around 1450 BC, during the reign of Pharaoh Thutmose III (1479-1425 BC). By the mid-20th century it had become apparent that the archaeological record made this date impossible. The mummy of Thutmoses III had already been discovered in 1881, and Egyptian records of that period do not mention the expulsion of any group that could be identified with over two million Hebrew slaves, nor any events which could be identified with the Biblical plagues. In addition, digs in the 1930s had failed to find traces of the simultaneous destruction of Canaanite cities c.1400 BC—in fact many of them, including Jericho, the first Canaanite city to fall to the Israelites according to the Book of Joshua, were uninhabited at the time.

The lack of evidence led William F. Albright, the leading biblical archaeologist of the period, to propose an alternative, "late" Exodus around 1200-1250 BC. His argument was based on the many strands of evidence, including the destruction at Beitel (Bethel) and some other cities at around that period, and the occurrence from the same period of distinctive house-types and a distinctive round-collared jar which, in his opinion, was to be identified with in-coming Israelites.

Albright's theory enjoyed popularity around the middle of the 20th century, but has now been generally abandoned in scholarship. The evidence which led to the abandonment of Albright's theory include: the collar-rimmed jars have been recognised as an indigenous form originating in lowland Canaanite cities centuries earlier; while some "Joshua" cities, including Hazor, Lachish, Megiddo and others, have destruction and transition layers around 1250-1145 BC, others, including Jericho, have no destruction layers or were uninhabited during this period; and the Merneptah Stele indicates that a people called "Israel" were already known in Canaan by the reign of Merneptah (1213-1203 BC).

Modern theories on the date - all of them popular rather than scholarly - tend to concentrate on an "early" Exodus, prior to c.1440 BC. The major candidates are:

  • The 2006 History Channel documentary The Exodus Decoded revived an idea first put forward by the 1st century AD Jewish historian Josephus, identifying the Israelites with the Hyksos, the non-Egyptian rulers of Egypt expelled by the resurgent native Eighteenth Dynasty of Egypt, c.1550-1530 BC. However, there are numerous difficulties with the theory, and it is dismissed by scholars.
  • David Rohl's 1995 A Test of Time attempted to correct Egyptian history by shortening the Third Intermediate Period of Egypt by almost 300 years. As a by-result the synchronisms with the biblical narrative have changed, making the 13th Dynasty pharaoh Djedneferre Dudimose (Dedumesu, Tutimaos, Tutimaios) the pharaoh of the Exodus. Rohl's theory, however, has failed to find support among most scholars in his field.
  • From time to time there have been attempts to link the Exodus with the eruption of the Aegean volcano of Thera in c.1600 BC on the grounds that it could provide a natural explanation of the Plagues of Egypt and the crossing of the Red Sea. This theory was discussed in the History Channel documentary, and also covered in the 2009 book by geologist Barbara J Sivertsen, The Parting of the Sea: How Volcanoes, Earthquakes, and Plagues Shaped the Story of the Exodus.

Extra-Biblical accounts

The earliest non-Biblical account of the Exodus is in the writings of the Greek author Hecataeus of Abdera: the Egyptians blame a plague on foreigners and expel them from the country, whereupon Moses, their leader, takes them to Canaan, where he founds the city of Jerusalem. Hecataeus wrote in the late 4th century BC, but the passage is quite possibly an insertion made in the mid-1st century BCE. The most famous is by the Egyptian historian Manetho (3rd century BC), known from two quotations by the 1st century AD Jewish historian Josephus. In the first, Manetho describes the Hyksos, their lowly origins in Asia, their dominion over and expulsion from Egypt, and their subsequent foundation of the city of Jerusalem and its temple. Josephus (not Manetho) identifies the Hyksos with the Jews. In the second story Manetho tells how 80,000 lepers and other "impure people," led by a priest named Osarseph, join forces with the former Hyksos, now living in Jerusalem, to take over Egypt. They wreak havoc until eventually the pharaoh and his son chase them out to the borders of Syria, where Osarseph gives the lepers a law-code and changes his name to Moses. Manetho differs from the other writers in describing his renegades as Egyptians rather than Jews, and in using a name other than Moses for their leader, although the identification of Osarseph with Moses may be a later addition.

See also

Notes

  1. Dever 2001, p. 99.
  2. ^ Walton 2003, p. 258.
  3. ^ Redmount 1998, p. 64.
  4. Davies 2001, p. 37.
  5. אָמַר לָהֶם רִבִּי אֶלְעָזָר בֶּן עֲזַרְיָה, הֲרֵי אֲנִי כְּבֶן שִׁבְעִים שָׁנָה, וְלֹא זָכִיתִי שֶׁתֵּאָמֵר יְצִיאַת מִצְרַיִם Passover Hagadah according to Mishneh Torah (Hebrew original), (mechon-mamre.org)
  6. Levinson 1997, p. 58.
  7. ^ Russell 2009, p. 1.
  8. Lenche 1985, p. 327. sfn error: no target: CITEREFLenche1985 (help)
  9. Exodus 12
  10. Numbers 1
  11. Kantor 2005, p. 70.
  12. Butzer 1999, p. 297.
  13. Cline 2007, p. 74.
  14. Dever 2003, p. 19. sfn error: multiple targets (2×): CITEREFDever2003 (help)
  15. Grisanti 2011, p. 240ff.
  16. ^ Meyers 2005, p. 5.
  17. Beitzel 1980, p. 6-7.
  18. Guillaume 1980, p. 8,15. sfn error: no target: CITEREFGuillaume1980 (help)
  19. Dever 2003, p. 99. sfn error: multiple targets (2×): CITEREFDever2003 (help)
  20. Shaw 2002, p. 313.
  21. Killebrew 2005, p. 176.
  22. Practico 1985, p. 1-32.
  23. ^ Van Seters 1997, p. 255ff.
  24. Soggin 1998, p. 128-129.
  25. Meyers 2005, p. 143.
  26. Hayes/Miller 1986, p. 59. sfn error: no target: CITEREFHayes/Miller1986 (help)
  27. Davies 1998, p. 180.
  28. Mercer Dictionary of the Bible, entry for Kadesh Barnea (Mercer University Press, 1991) p.485
  29. Hoffmeier 2005, p. 115ff.
  30. Seder Olam Rabbah, Finegan, Jack, Handbook of Biblical Chronology, Revised Ed., Hendrickson Publishers, Inc., 1998, p. 111
  31. Howard, David M. Jr. and Michael A. Grisanti (editors) (2003). "The Date of the Exodus (by William H. Shea)". Giving the Sense: Understanding and Using the Old Testament Historical Texts. Kregel Publications. ISBN 9781844740161. {{cite book}}: |first1= has generic name (help)
  32. "Tuthmosis", Egyptology Online
  33. Kitchen, Kenneth A (2003). On the Reliability of the Old Testament. Eerdmans. pp. 309–10. ISBN 978-0802849601.
  34. Mary Joan Winn Leith, "How a People Forms", review of "Biblical Peoples and Ethnicity: An Archaeological Study of Egyptians, Canaanites, Philistines and Early Israel" (2001), Biblical Archaeology Review, May/June 2006, pp.22-23
  35. Finkelstein, Silberman 2002. sfn error: no target: CITEREFFinkelstein,_Silberman2002 (help)
  36. Dever, William G (2003). Who Were the Early Israelites and Where Did They Come From?. Eerdmans. pp. 44–46. ISBN 0802844162.
  37. Currie, Robert and Hyslop, Stephen G. The Letter and the Scroll: What Archaeology Tells Us About the Bible. Washington, D.C.: National Geographic, 2009.
  38. "Debunking "The Exodus Decoded"". September 20, 2006. Retrieved 8 August 2009.
  39. "The Exodus Decoded: An Extended Review". Tuesday 19 Dec 2006. Retrieved 8 August 2009. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  40. Rohl, David (1995). "Chapter 13". A Test of Time. Arrow. pp. 341–8. ISBN 0099416565.
  41. Bennett, Chris. "Temporal Fugues", Journal of Ancient and Medieval Studies XIII (1996). Available at
  42. Sivertsen, Barbara J (2009). The Parting of the Sea: How Volcanoes, Earthquakes, and Plagues Shaped the Story of the Exodus. Princeton University Press. ISBN 9780691137704.
  43. ^ Noll 2001, p. 34.
  44. Gmirkin 2006, p. 55-56.
  45. Droge 1996, p. 121-122.
  46. ^ Droge 1996, p. 134-135.
  47. Feldman 1998, p. 342.

Bibliography

Aharoni, Yohanan (1982). The Archaeology of the Land of Israel. Westminster Press. ISBN 0-664-21384-7. {{cite book}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help)
Assman, Jan (1997). Moses the Egyptian. First Harvard University Press. ISBN 0-664-21384-7. {{cite book}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help)
Beitzel, Barry (Spring 1980). "Exodus 3:14 and the divine Name: A Case of Biblical Paronomasia". Trinity Journal (Trinity Divinity School). Vol.1: 5–20. {{cite journal}}: |volume= has extra text (help); Invalid |ref=harv (help)CS1 maint: year (link)
Bimson, John J. (1981). Redating the Exodus. Sheffield Academic Press. ISBN 0-907459-04-8. {{cite book}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help)
Butzer, Karl W. (1999). "Demographics". In Bard, Kathryn A.; Shubert, Steven (eds.). Encyclopedia of the archaeology of ancient Egypt. Routledge. ISBN 0-907459-04-8. {{cite book}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help)
Cline, Eric H. (2007). From Eden to Exile. National Geographic Society. ISBN 9781426200847. {{cite book}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help)
De Moor, Johannes C. (1996). "Egypt, Ugarit and Exodus". In Wyatt, N.; Watson, W. G. E. (eds.). Ugarit, Religion and Culture. ISBN 3-927120-37-5. {{cite book}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help)
Davies, Graham (2001). "Introduction to the Pentateuch". In Barton, John (ed.). Oxford Bible Commentary. Oxford University Press. p. 37. {{cite book}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help)
Davies, Graham (2004). "Was There an Exodus?". In Day, John (ed.). In search of pre-exilic Israel: proceedings of the Oxford Old Testament Seminar. Continuum. {{cite book}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help)
Davies, Philip (1998). Scribes and Schools: The Canonization of the Hebrew Scriptures. Westminster John Knox. {{cite book}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help)
Dever, William (2001). What Did the Biblical Writers Know, and When Did They Know It?. Eerdmans. ISBN 3-927120-37-5. {{cite book}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help)
Dever, William (2003). Who Were the Early Israelites and Where Did They Come From?. Eerdmans. ISBN 3-927120-37-5. {{cite book}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help)
Droge, Arthur J. (1996). "Josephus Between Greeks and Barbarians". In Feldman, L.H.; Levison, J.R. (eds.). Josephus' Contra Apion. Brill. {{cite book}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help)
Frerichs; Lesko; Dever, eds. (1997). Exodus: The Egyptian Evidence. Eisenbrauns. ISBN 1-57506-025-6. {{cite book}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help)
Feldman, Louis H. (1998). Josephus's interpretation of the Bible. University of California Press. {{cite book}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help)
Finkelstein, Israel; Silberman, Neil Asher (2001). The Bible Unearthed. Free Press. ISBN 0-684-86912-8. {{cite book}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help)
Gmirkin, Russell E. (2006). Berossus and Genesis, Manetho and Exodus: Hellenistic Histories and The Date of the Pentateuch. T & T Clark International. {{cite book}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help)
Grisanti, Michael A. (2011). "The Book of Numbers". In Merrill, Eugene H.; Rooker, Mark; Grisanti, Michael A. (eds.). The World and the Word. B&H Publishing. {{cite book}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help)
Guillaume, Philippe. "Tracing the Origin of the Sabbatical Calendar in the Priestly Narrative, Genesis 1 to Joshua 5". Journal of Hebrew Scriptures. Vol.5, article 13, Spring 1980. {{cite journal}}: |volume= has extra text (help); Invalid |ref=harv (help)
Hayes, John Haralson; Miller, James Maxwell (1986). A History of Ancient Israel and Judah. Westminster John Knox. {{cite book}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help)
Hoffmeier, James K (1999). Israel in Egypt. Oxford University Press. ISBN 9780195130881. {{cite book}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help)
Hoffmeier, James K (2005). Ancient Israel in Sinai. Oxford University Press. ISBN 9780195155464. {{cite book}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help)
Shaw, Ian (2002). "Israel, Israelites". In Jameson, Robert; Ian (eds.). A dictionary of archaeology. Wiley Blackwell. {{cite book}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help)
Kantor, Mattis (2005). Codex Judaica. Zichron Press. {{cite book}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help)
Killebrew, Anne E. (2005). Biblical Peoples and Ethnicity. Society of Biblical Literature. {{cite book}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help)
Kitchen, Kenneth (2006). "Egyptology and the traditions of early Hebrew antiquity (Genesis and Exodus)". In Rogerson, John William; Lieu, Judith (eds.). The Oxford handbook of biblical studies. Oxford University Press. {{cite book}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help)
Lemche, Niels Peter (1985). Early Israel: anthropological and historical studies. Brill. {{cite book}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help)
Levinson, Bernard Malcolm (1997). Deuteronomy and the hermeneutics of legal innovation. OUP. {{cite book}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help)
McDermott, John (2002). Reading the Pentateuch. Paulist Press. {{cite book}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help)
McEntire, Mark (2008). Struggling with God: An Introduction to the Pentateuch. Mercer University Press. {{cite book}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help)
Meyers, Carol (2005). Exodus. Cambridge University Press. {{cite book}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help)
Noll, K.L. (2001). Canaan and Israel in Antiquity: An Introduction. Sheffield Academic Press. {{cite book}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help)
Practico, Gary D. (Summer 1985). "Nelson Glueck's 1938-1940 Excavations at Tell el-Kheleifeh: A Reappraisal". Bulletin of the American Schools of Oriental Research (BASOR). No. 259: 1–32. {{cite journal}}: |volume= has extra text (help); Invalid |ref=harv (help)CS1 maint: year (link)
Redmount, Carol A. (1998). "Bitter Lives: Israel In And Out of Egypt". In Coogan, Michael D. (ed.). The Oxford History of the Biblical World. OUP. {{cite book}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help)
Russell, Stephen C. (2009). Images of Egypt in early biblical literature. Walter de Gruyter. {{cite book}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help)
Soggin, John (1998 ). An Introduction to the History of Israel and Judah. SCM Press. {{cite book}}: Check date values in: |year= (help); Invalid |ref=harv (help)CS1 maint: year (link)
Tigay, Jeffrey H. (2004). "Exodus". In Berlin, Adele; Brettler, Marc Zvi (eds.). The Jewish study Bible. Oxford University Press. {{cite book}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help)
Van Seters, John (1997). "The Geography of the Exodus". In Silberman, Neil Ash (ed.). The land that I will show you. Sheffield Academic Press. ISBN 978-1850756507. {{cite book}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help)
Walton, John W. (2003). "Exodus, date of". In Alexander, T.D.; Baker, David W. (eds.). Dictionary of the Old Testament: Pentateuch. InterVarsity Press. {{cite book}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help)
Whitelam, Keith W. (2006). "General problems of studying the text of the bible...". In Rogerson, John William; Lieu, Judith (eds.). The Oxford handbook of biblical studies. Oxford University Press. {{cite book}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help)
Younger, K. Lawson, Jr. (2004). "Early Israel in recent biblical studies". In Arnold, Bill T.; Baker, David W. (eds.). The face of Old Testament studies. Baker Academic. {{cite book}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help)CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
Passover
Seder
Plate
Haggadah
Songs
Illustrations
Foods
Matzah
Dishes
Companies
Main courses
Desserts
Religious
Observances
Laws/customs
Prayers
Categories: