| Revision as of 17:22, 27 March 2012 editDHeyward (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers18,753 editsmNo edit summary← Previous edit |
Latest revision as of 22:28, 27 March 2012 edit undoDHeyward (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers18,753 edits corrrecting error. Doesn't belong here. |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
|
== John's comments regarding MF == |
|
|
|
|
|
*Did you really think that was helpful? --] (]) 09:20, 24 September 2011 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
**More helpful than "subpar forever" because it didn't push fringe group POV. I'm hoping the comment gave him some perspective that collaborative editing doesn't mean he always gets his way or article quality is in any way tied to one editors desire. What were you hoping to accomplish by extending this debate? --] (]) 09:31, 24 September 2011 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
***In what way is "subpar forever" an instance of him "push fringe group POV"? Have you read the GAR? Do you really think it is only one editor who thinks the article has some serious holes? I was hoping to engender some "collaborative editing" because, to me, your comment really wasn't a good example of that. In order to improve the article beyond its current state we will all have to work together and listen to each other. Are you capable of that? --] (]) 09:35, 24 September 2011 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
::::We already heard it. General consensus is "no" after hearing ''years'' of arguments. It doesn't change. Those that can't edit within that framework should stop trying to edit those articles. This conversation on my talk page is over, BTW. Please take it to the article talk page where I may or may participate. Fair warning that I will consider a reply here to be possible trolling and will simply revert it. --] (]) 09:42, 24 September 2011 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== Hounding == |
|
== Hounding == |
|
{{discussion top}} |
|
{{discussion top}} |