| Revision as of 03:09, 1 April 2012 editTimeshift9 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers67,126 edits RIP← Previous edit | Revision as of 03:32, 1 April 2012 edit undoTimeshift9 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers67,126 edits rant time!Next edit → | ||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
| ], ], ], ]... RIP. | ], ], ], ]... RIP. | ||
| ---- | |||
| All this Queensland rubbish is nauseating. The reason the ALP's 7 in QLD happened is NEWman came along as their Rudd replacement, further inflaming the Rudd issue. Queensland loved Rudd. Queensland was the only state to have any semblance of a swing at the 2010 federal election - go have a look. When Gillard took over from Rudd, QLD didn't forgive and they won't forgive for some time. The QLD election was always going to be a shellacking, just look at the polls since Newman came along. WA and Vic were very marginal losses, and state NSW Labor had it coming in the polls for years. Julia would have walked over hot coals for two 47-53's in a row last year. Abbott remains at his highest dissatisfaction rating ever, 58 percent, and he's not even making the good or bad decisions in government to make people like or dislike him. Previous polls in previous periods of government have shown that Gillard Labor is not in a terminal position, a week is a long time in politics, and federal election campaigns are notorious for the polls tightening. This rant was brought to you by today's miserable coverage by Sky News/The Australian Agenda. | |||
| ---- | ---- | ||
Revision as of 03:32, 1 April 2012
Margaret Whitlam, Dale Baker, Judith Adams, Lionel Bowen... RIP. All this Queensland rubbish is nauseating. The reason the ALP's 7 in QLD happened is NEWman came along as their Rudd replacement, further inflaming the Rudd issue. Queensland loved Rudd. Queensland was the only state to have any semblance of a swing at the 2010 federal election - go have a look. When Gillard took over from Rudd, QLD didn't forgive and they won't forgive for some time. The QLD election was always going to be a shellacking, just look at the polls since Newman came along. WA and Vic were very marginal losses, and state NSW Labor had it coming in the polls for years. Julia would have walked over hot coals for two 47-53's in a row last year. Abbott remains at his highest dissatisfaction rating ever, 58 percent, and he's not even making the good or bad decisions in government to make people like or dislike him. Previous polls in previous periods of government have shown that Gillard Labor is not in a terminal position, a week is a long time in politics, and federal election campaigns are notorious for the polls tightening. This rant was brought to you by today's miserable coverage by Sky News/The Australian Agenda. I like it how often I get comments around wiki about my userpage. I must be doing something right :P Clive Palmer, massive Liberal Party bankroller and influencer, comes out and says... wait for it... the CIA and the treasonist Australian Greens are in cahoots with each other to destroy Australia's coal industry. I hope the legal action against such a frequent litigator is successful :) I've done quite a bit of work on Two-party-preferred vote and Australian Labor Party lately... tell me what you think! Speaking of which, what on earth is going on with the latest Newspoll interpretations by the media, especially Sky News and The Australian? Elections are not decided on primary votes!!! Historical Newspoll shows much more enlarged mid-term slumps than 47-53 and recovered by election time - a week is a long time in politics. But if the primary vote must be discussed, then why can't they highlight how the Coalition is on its lowest primary vote for a year? Or that Abbott's disapproval, at 58 percent, is his highest ever? Julia would have crawled over hot coals in the second half of last year in Newspoll to get two 47-53's in a row. Katter is a loon and Tony has a great big massive enormous new tax. This is news...? :) Fear the Greens! LOL The media, specifically The Advertiser in this case, continue to have a complete lack of knowledge and disrespect for our electoral system. Did the federal seat of Mayo become a potential Labor win after the Mayo by-election, 2008? Try reading Port Adelaide state by-election, 2012 results section sometime and learn what asymmetrical preference flows without a major party candidate is. Media ignorance is rampant, truly rampant, and it does more damage to our democracy than any political party can.
http://www.adelaidenow.com.au/poll-result-falls-in-my-lap-premier/story-e6frea6u-1226268232710 LOL! Well on the first para, I thought the deputy leader said "he was sure that the speculation was coming purely from the Labor Party". The above seems to contradict this? Or perhaps you're referring to Redmond's former ALP membership? Honestly, you can always trust the SA Libs infighting to flare up directly prior to any form of an election, even ones they aren't running in. They simply cannot help themselves! As for the second para, well I did always find it odd that a Liberal last year is an independent this year. I would have thought after the 2010 fed result that independent and Liberal DNA just don't splice! It's always good to have an election of some form here in SA :) Because after contesting every by-election since 1974 in Goyder and 9 of 12 general election wins, it becomes a rather nice expected regularity :) "Close call as Labor takes a hit in Port Adelaide": Sunday Mail (The Advertiser) - that headline was expected since Close entered the race. What a non-event, *yawn*. Obviously this headline was in storage for the past few months. I'm sure the same will be said when the city wakes up to the "headlines" in this one-paper town. But in the end, Labor easily retained the seat, despite so many variables - lol. Abbott harks back to the Howard days as if they served the country well. They didn't. What did a current Liberal Premier say recently?
Yes ladies and gentlemen, this is how the Liberal Party are when they're in power. But as far as backflips go, I guess Abbott has had the most practice... here's a nice paraphrase: "Climate change is crap and we need direct action to combat it, not a simple tax that I suggested in 2009 before Gillard did!" 2011, the year of delivery for Gillard Labor. They introduced plain cigarette packaging laws, put in place a flood levy to pay for the disaster caused by the 2010-2011 Queensland Floods tragedy and introduced the Clean Energy Bill to assist in the fight against climate change. Gillard reached an historic agreement for health care reform with state and territory leaders, and introduced an MRRT to fund various areas including a superannuation increase and cuts to the company tax rate. Agreements with Telstra have been reached in regard to the National Broadband Network, with the rollout going to plan. Labor reduced income tax rates in 2008, 2009, 2010. The unemployment rate is around 5%, interest rates are lower than during the Howard government, inflation is reasonable, and we have one of the lowest government debts in the world whilst successfully steering the country through the Global Financial Crisis. We are not in recession, infact we have one of the best GDP figures in the world. All of this with only 72 of 150 lower house seats, the Noalition now stifling all government legislation of the day, relying on the Greens and three independents to pass any legislation, the first hung parliament in 70 years, against the most disingenuous, policy-free, contradictory, hypocritical, regressive opposition and media Australia has ever seen. Gillard has gone further in a hung parliament than Menzies did, and with double the number of crossbenchers. All in all, hundreds of bills passed, all prior to gaining Slipper, changing parliamentary majority numbers for the government from 75-74 to 76-73, a bombshell on the last day of the 2011 parliamentary year. Only a staunch Labor supporter would have foreseen all of the above at the outcome of the last election. So please, News Ltd and Liberal fanbois, tell me precisely how this is an "incompetent government"? Abbott works on the theory that if you say something enough, people begin to believe it. Look how he went on about the 2010 result but would have done the same things himself, then we get his old tricks with a November 2011 Oakeshott counter offer to Labor's Slipper. Imagine what sort of a government and country would appear from an Abbott-led government. Last time they were in all they did was give us a GST and WorkChoices and rode off the back of a Labor-driven pot of gold economy in 11 wasted years of power. Why can't they win government by being liked rather than by not being someone else they paint as bad? Luckily for Australians, no opposition leader with a 50%+ dissatisfaction rating has ever been PM. Opposition leader material, but not PM material is what the public can see. This is shown in the polls only when you look at satisfaction ratings which are the only indicators that do not sway with the popularity of the other side. 2-4 December was the last Newspoll for the year in which Abbott sunk to a new low - 33% satisfaction, 57% dissatisfaction. For someone not having to wear the decisions of a currently incumbent government... wow. Even Turnbull's last result was 36% sat 50% dissat. I wonder how Abbott feels that his Preferred PM number is higher than his satisfaction number. When does party-leader hunting season begin? :) The opposition and media go to the extraordinary lengths of claiming the government has killed people and houses have burnt down as a result of the stimulus, when infact the pink batts program actually drove the statistics down. Where's the articles now? Are the batts really burning? No, but the right-wing media are. A picture tells a thousand words. Need to find free Public Domain or Creative Commons images? These are the places I search most:
|
|
.svg){kind=small}
| Elections and referendums in South Australia | |
|---|---|
| General elections | |
| Legislative Council elections | |
| Local elections | |
| First Nations Voice | |
| Referendums | |
| Related | |
| Government of South Australia | ||
|---|---|---|
| Executive |  | |
| Legislative | ||
| Judicial | ||
 Federal elections and referendums in Australia | |
|---|---|
| Federal elections | |
| Constitutional Convention | |
| Referendums | |
| See also: By-elections | |
| This is a Wikipedia user page. This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user whom this page is about may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia. The original page is located at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Timeshift9. |
This user has no affiliation whatsoever with any political entity (unless you count being a union member, of which about 30 percent are Liberal voters)
Categories: