| Revision as of 01:09, 3 April 2012 editCourcelles (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Autopatrolled, Administrators434,776 edits →Bridgette B: re← Previous edit | Revision as of 01:14, 3 April 2012 edit undoCourcelles (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Autopatrolled, Administrators434,776 edits →Harassment of editors and Arbcom transparency: reNext edit → | ||
| Line 40: | Line 40: | ||
| The last thing, it is of course Fae's choice if he wishes to request a case for Arbitration, but these questions are not being asked to have an end-run around the Arbitration process, but are being asked in the interests of transparency on a specific example that the Committee was aware of and refused to act upon. I would expect Fae and other editors (especially LGBT editors) would be wanting transparent answers here now, before deciding if they wish to act. ] <sup>]</sup> 07:53, 2 April 2012 (UTC) | The last thing, it is of course Fae's choice if he wishes to request a case for Arbitration, but these questions are not being asked to have an end-run around the Arbitration process, but are being asked in the interests of transparency on a specific example that the Committee was aware of and refused to act upon. I would expect Fae and other editors (especially LGBT editors) would be wanting transparent answers here now, before deciding if they wish to act. ] <sup>]</sup> 07:53, 2 April 2012 (UTC) | ||
| :In order, the RFC was discussed in very general terms, I did think the entire matter warranted closer review, and no vote was taken. ] 01:14, 3 April 2012 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | == ] == | ||
Revision as of 01:14, 3 April 2012
 | Courcelles is taking a short wikibreak and will be back on Misplaced Pages soon. |
 Archives |
|
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 |
|
This page has archives. Sections may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
Bridgette B
- Would you please unsalt this article? She does pass WP:PORNBIO now, as she has won an AVN Award; see here. Erpert 20:45, 1 April 2012 (UTC)
- Done, though it wouldn't surprise me at all to see this back at AFD, PORNBIO is a crapshoot in the "field" at AFD and DRV. Courcelles 01:09, 3 April 2012 (UTC)
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.
- Seen, ill reply tomorrow (later today, actually) Courcelles 05:11, 2 April 2012 (UTC)
Harassment of editors and Arbcom transparency
On my talk page at User_talk:Russavia#Comment_from_AGK, there is a discussion between myself and your fellow Arb User:AGK, concerning an issue which came to the attention of Arbcom. As the various links and diffs show, many editors saw the recent RFC/U against User:Fae as harassment, at best, and as homophobic harassment, at worst.
AGK firstly stated that he "voted" to ban Delicious Carbuncle, then has "corrected" himself to state that he merely was in favour of the Committee reviewing the case; either way there was opposition on the Committee to either banning Delicious Carbuncle or even reviewing the harassment that Fae was being subjected to.
As an Arb, the community elected you to represent the community for the community. The Committee time and time again pushes on editors who come before it that transparency is essential in our editing; in fact, transparency is one of the key tenets of this project, however the Arbcom often does not act in the same transparent way that it (and the community) expects of the community itself.
AGK states on my talk page that one can only expect a transparent hearing if a request for arbitration is filed, and states that most Arbcom business is conducted this way. This notion is somewhat correct, but it is also very wrong. As the committee time and time makes a point of stating that community transparency is essential, the community also expects the same of the Committee -- at all times. The Committee also makes many decisions "behind closed doors", and when pushed to explain decisions cites various "get out of jail free cards" to avoid being transparent to the community-at-large. This includes decisions such as banning editors for things done offwiki which can't clearly be attributed to that editor, or unbanning editors with a history of socking, etc, etc.
In aid of this, and in the interests of transparency to the Community at large, I am asking that you answer the following questions:
- Did you discuss the harassment of Fae on the Arbcom-l mailing list?
- If you did discuss this on the mailing list, were you in favour or against the Committee reviewing the information?
- If the discussion got to anything resembling a vote, did you vote in favour or against banning Delicious Carbuncle?
These are very simple questions which one is able to answer if they are truly for transparency both on the Committee and in the community in general, and I would expect that many in the community would be wanting transparent answers to these questions.
The last thing, it is of course Fae's choice if he wishes to request a case for Arbitration, but these questions are not being asked to have an end-run around the Arbitration process, but are being asked in the interests of transparency on a specific example that the Committee was aware of and refused to act upon. I would expect Fae and other editors (especially LGBT editors) would be wanting transparent answers here now, before deciding if they wish to act. Russavia 07:53, 2 April 2012 (UTC)
- In order, the RFC was discussed in very general terms, I did think the entire matter warranted closer review, and no vote was taken. Courcelles 01:14, 3 April 2012 (UTC)
List of professional cyclists who died during a race
Would appreciate your feedback as I continue the process of converting the bulleted text into Table form. Thanks, Shearonink (talk) 14:55, 2 April 2012 (UTC)
Interview
Hi, my name is Pedro Rodriguez. I am a student at Michigan State University, working on an exploration of the Misplaced Pages adminship process under Jonathan Obar. You had previously showed interest in being a interviewee for our study. I can conduct the interview via Skype or email, whichever you prefer. I can be contacted at my email: rodri397@msu.edu to set up a time to Skype or , if you wish, to obtain your email to conduct the interview that way. Thank you for your participation in our study. SirGuybrush (talk)