Article snapshot taken from[REDACTED] with creative commons attribution-sharealike license.
Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat.
We can research this topic together.
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 22:
Line 22:
</div>
</div>
<!-- EdwardsBot 0253 -->
<!-- EdwardsBot 0253 -->
== Your discussion of private correspondence to ArbCom ==
AGK, by the nature of a private request to ArbCom, including the summarizing the correspondence, you are sending a very mixed message. As a member of ArbCom you may be unable to defend your self against some criticism because to do so would violate the trust of others. If private correspondence with ArbCom is private and therefore not subject to the expectation of transparency that accompanies public requests, so say and leave it at that. If you are discussing details of this particular request without Fæ's permission, I have to question your judgment. ] (]) 14:28, 3 April 2012 (UTC)
:It appears that Fæ did not give permission and about your statements. ] (]) 14:32, 3 April 2012 (UTC)
Revision as of 14:32, 3 April 2012
AGK is taking a WikiBreak for his academic commitments, but will be back in May. E-mail and messages may go unanswered.
Your discussion of private correspondence to ArbCom
AGK, by discussing the nature of a private request to ArbCom, including the summarizing the correspondence, you are sending a very mixed message. As a member of ArbCom you may be unable to defend your self against some criticism because to do so would violate the trust of others. If private correspondence with ArbCom is private and therefore not subject to the expectation of transparency that accompanies public requests, so say and leave it at that. If you are discussing details of this particular request without Fæ's permission, I have to question your judgment. Delicious carbuncle (talk) 14:28, 3 April 2012 (UTC)
