Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 08:58, 5 April 2012

Kiefer.Wolfowitz is taking a short wikibreak and will be back on Misplaced Pages soon.

This user is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries.

Labor donated

Archives

1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47

This page has archives. Sections older than 11 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 1 section is present.

24 December 2024
News and notes: Responsibilities and liabilities as a "Very Large Online Platform" Op-ed: Beeblebrox on Wikipediocracy, the Committee, and everything Opinion: Graham87 on being the first-ever administrator recall subject In the media: Delhi High Court considers Caravan and Ken for evaluating the ANI vs. WMF case From the archives: Where to draw the line in reporting? Recent research: "Misplaced Pages editors are quite prosocial", but those motivated by "social image" may put quantity over quality Humour: Backlash over Santa Claus' Misplaced Pages article intensifies Gallery: A feast of holidays and carols Traffic report: Was a long and dark December
Single page Front page About Subscribe Suggestions Archives

Attention Kiefer.Wolfowitz, this template is appearing because there are currently 2 images with tags requesting to be renamed (help out).

This user is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries.

The Signpost: 09 January 2012

RfA of SW and A Question

I m sorry for my comment. It was my first time when I became active in any RfA, so I got carried away way to far. I was so worked up that i ended up making a silly comment which u objected. It was not my intention to be aggressive or not to be polite, but that comment was like one. I understand my mistake and ensure you that you will not get any further complains for me.

I also want to be clarified, I thought that u might help me. Previously there was " " in my sign, but a editor friend showed me that why images are not proper for sign so i eventually removed it. But lately, i have kept " :) " in place of the picture. I wanted to know that will it create any problem, I have read WP:SIGN and didnt find any problem in using " :) ". I just wanted to be sure, so asked for an opinion from an senior editor. Please tell me if I m going wrong in any direction.

Again, I m very sorry for my comment and I ensure you i wont repeat that mistake again. Thank You! Yasht101 :) 01:41, 24 March 2012 (UTC)

Hi Yasht101,

You seem like a nice editor, and are obviously smart. I am sure that you will learn quickly, in fact, more quickly than some "editors" who seem not to have progressed much beyond line editing and schoolmarming despite years of opportunities.

I actually liked the smiley face in your signature. :) But, I suppose that "rules are rules". :(

I saw that you were from India. :) have a lot of friends from India, and in fact my profession is statistics, where we all look to the Indian Statistical Institute for guidance!

Best regards,  Kiefer.Wolfowitz 11:31, 24 March 2012 (UTC)

Thank you very much sir for that. I m really willing to improve myself and want to become a good editor like you (I saw your contributions) one day. If I make any mistake that you find then please let me know. It will be helpful for me to improvise. Happy editing! Yasht101 :) 11:25, 24 March 2012 (UTC)

Hi Yasht101! The only advice that I would ask you to think about is this: Young editors often edit on Misplaced Pages and become distracted from more important tasks, particularly studying and learning new facts and skills. Good luck!  Kiefer.Wolfowitz 11:31, 24 March 2012 (UTC)

Yes, I'll take care of it. I m a ranker of my school so there is always huge pressure from my family, relatives and teachers on me that I'll do very good in studies. I sometimes get badly frustrated and at that time wikipedia really helps me a lot. You can say that now wikipedia is my drug and I cant live without it. It has helped me in becoming more polite, sincere and thoughtful in my real life. Right now, i have my summer vacations so there will be a lot of edits by me as my exams just ended 5 days before. Yasht101 :) 11:40, 24 March 2012 (UTC)

Congratulations on your achievements! You have every right to give yourself a well-deserved break, especially when you spend it helping others here! :)

Best regards,  Kiefer.Wolfowitz 12:12, 24 March 2012 (UTC)

My list

I have created a list and i have included ur name in it. I hope u dont mind that. You can view it over Here! Yasht101 :) 01:41, 25 March 2012 (UTC)

Sir, I am honored! :)  Kiefer.Wolfowitz 07:58, 25 March 2012 (UTC)

Oh sir, I m no sir. I am in my teenage. Yasht101 :) 09:09, 25 March 2012 (UTC)

Amartya K. Sen was young when Tagore named him "Amartya". John Stuart Mill was young when he began writing books for his father. Just work hard, have fun, and resist the temptation to fudge the truth.  Kiefer.Wolfowitz 09:17, 25 March 2012 (UTC)

Hey, thats really inspiring. I cant be great like them, but atleast can do something good with my life. Yasht101 :) 09:23, 25 March 2012 (UTC)

John Stuart Mill was not happy until later in life, and then he was saddened after his wife died. Some geniuses suffer from always wanting to please their father or mother for the rest of their lives, even after their parents are dead.

It's a good idea to spend more time with your calculus book, Sen, and Mill, and most importantly your friends and family (even if it means that you have less time on Misplaced Pages). Have you read Sen and Drèze on poverty in India? C. R. Rao has an inspiring book, Statistics and truth: Putting chance to work, that you may enjoy. He starts off by thanking his mother for waking him at 4 a.m. (when his mind was freshest) to study. Kiefer.Wolfowitz 09:41, 25 March 2012 (UTC)

Sorry for my late reply, I just missed out your username in my watchlist. My mom doesnt have time to wake me up early so I myself get up at 4:30 0r 5 and start my work. I havent heard of the book that you mentioned. I'll buy it next time when I visit the book-store. Can you briefly describe what exactly is in that book? I m sorry if I m wasting your time or bothering you. Yasht101 :) 16:15, 25 March 2012 (UTC)

Hi Yasht101!

I'm a statistician, and so when I see an intelligent young person I mention that statistics is an interesting profession and useful tool for anybody.

Rao's book is an interesting lecture for a general audience. I trust Google Books or World Scientific have brief discussions of it. Rao begins by discussing some ideas of Charles Sanders Peirce, about three modes of reasoning, deduction, induction, and abduction, although I forget whether Rao discusses Peirce in detail.

It might be worthwhile just to begin with Peirce, whose work appears freely at many sites, including Wikisource.

Proceeds from Rao's book benefits the Third World Academy of Science, which sounds like a good cause to me. (A baseball coach and mathematician also recommends waking at 4 am in the summer, when it is cool and quiet....)

I have long been a fan of Professor Sen, whose good sense and good humor make his super-human intellect non-intimidating! Many years ago I remember picking up Sen's article on "Millions of missing women" and thinking about all the scientific/statistical questions it raised!

Cheers,  Kiefer.Wolfowitz 16:25, 25 March 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Discipline Global Mobile

On 25 March 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Discipline Global Mobile, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the music company Discipline Global Mobile has the policy that copyrights belong to artists and consequently does not own even its corporate logo (pictured)? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Discipline Global Mobile.You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Casliber (talk · contribs) 10:59, 25 March 2012 (UTC)

Warm greetings

I stopped by here to tell you that I took your "oppose" most seriously in the Snotty/Scotty RfA. My decision to support was with a trace of reluctance, for that reason as well as some earlier negative interactions of my own. But the editor has shown clear signs of maturing and taking previous criticism to heart. As have you, my friend.

Above, I have read your efforts to welcome, advise and mentor a young editor from India. Your kind words and informed comments about his country impressed me greatly, and I have no doubt that the favorable impact they had on that young person will be long lasting.

A few moments ago, my wife showed me a friendly and encouraging comment that a young man wrote in her high school yearbook over 40 years ago. My wife felt very isolated and insecure in those years, and was greatly impressed and cheered by that brief note. She is again in touch with him through Facebook, as he is a music professional and one of our sons is an aspiring semi-professional musician. Kind, supportive words can be remembered for decades. Cullen Let's discuss it 16:48, 25 March 2012 (UTC)

Hi Cullen328,

Thanks for your kind words! However, "mentoring" would be too strong! I tried to find a nice way to say (while being honest) that editing Misplaced Pages is a poor use of time at his age---my usual (and according to many, unwarranted) paternalism.

About my "improving". All of us have our bad days, and I was irritable a few weeks ago because I was editing too much while under real world stress. However, the Discipline Global Mobile article is now GA and led today's DYKs, so perhaps the effort was worth it.

Regarding the RfA, I cannot comment fully per WP:NPA, apart from saying that (whatever one thinks of Keepscases) it is another thing entirely to try to "poke" Fetchcomms in the eye, to state contempt for the NPA blocks, etc. I would prefer the candidate to state that he will stay away from articles and editor-conflicts, and then I would be the first---or 100th now---to applaud his great contributions elsewhere and support him without reservation.

Cheers,  Kiefer.Wolfowitz 17:04, 25 March 2012 (UTC)

The erudition and kindness of your remarks cannot be called paternalism, and in my view, your recommendations were at least heading in the direction of constructive mentoring. Because I am unfamiliar with the specifics of the Keepscases/Fetchcomms incident, I will refrain from commenting. Instead of taking the time to delve into that unpleasantness, I will instead read Discipline Global Mobile. Congratulations on the GA and DYK. Cullen Let's discuss it 18:48, 25 March 2012 (UTC)

What an outstanding article about an interesting and worthy topic! I thought that it would be about a cell phone company. I was a founder of and participant in a cooperative record store in the suburbs of Detroit from 1970 to 1972, and I remember selling King Crimson albums very well back then. "It was 40 years ago today . . ." Cullen Let's discuss it 18:54, 25 March 2012 (UTC)

I'm adding my delighted grins here, too, about the way you've been communicating with that young editor :D It's been a joy to be reading. Cullen – I still have, somewhere, my copy of In the Court of the Crimson King. Wonderful stuff. Pesky (talk) 19:08, 25 March 2012 (UTC)

Aah, Cullen, you were in Detroit in 1972. You must have been familiar with an alphabet soup of sectarians. Have you read Detroit, I Do Mind Dying: A Study of Urban Revolution with its many fascinating chapters, e.g. Mr. Justin Ravitz, Marxist Judge of Recorder's Court? Judge Ravitz required that everybody stand when the jury entered the chambers! :)  Kiefer.Wolfowitz 19:58, 25 March 2012 (UTC)

I left the Detroit area in 1972, before Justin Ravitz was elected as a judge, but I was very familiar with Ravitz when I was a teenage radical, because his law firm was noted for defence of black militants and leftists. When I was young, people like George W. Crockett, Jr., Ken Cockrel (father of a recent Detrot mayor), Frank Joyce and Sheila Murphy were the "heavy hitters", and all are profiled in that book, which I haven't read but should. Joyce headed a group called "People Against Racism" and they had an unofficial youth affiliate called "Youth for Peace, Freedom and Justice" that I joined about the time of my 17th birthday. Groups like the Dodge Revolutionary Union Movement, the Motor City Labor League and the League of Revolutionary Black Workers were the "workerist" groups that were widely discussed among my friends, although we were white, lower-middle class and working class New Left radicals, and had little connection with the big factories or the unions. We heard stories about the Ford Hunger March (my article) and the strikes and sit-ins of the 30s from the old timers. Cullen Let's discuss it 20:48, 25 March 2012 (UTC)

Misplaced Pages:Misplaced Pages for World Heritage

I need your assistance in developing and spreading a wikiproject. Can you help me in developing and spreading this page in wikipedia: Misplaced Pages:Misplaced Pages for World Heritage

Thank you and Happy editing! Yasht101 :) 06:55, 26 March 2012 (UTC)

I think that such political campaigns (here aimed at influencing a government of governments) are better conducted off-Misplaced Pages. I agree that such a campaign is worthwhile, and I suppose that Facebook would be a good place to organize this campaign.  Kiefer.Wolfowitz 15:20, 26 March 2012 (UTC)

Previous accounts of another editor.

Hi KW. I see you've asked for history of a user's previous account. Could I request that you remove that query from the RfA, asking at the user's talk page if you feel it necessary, as it is the sort of thing that leads to a lot of the "drama" that you find at RfAs and isn't related to that RfA. As it happens, I'd also suggest that you don't even bother with the question - if the user is under a WP:CLEANSTART he will be under no obligation to tell you, but there should be nothing to worry about, if they're avoiding a near block/ban, then they are unlike to answer truthfully. Thanks for your time Worm · (talk) 14:24, 26 March 2012 (UTC)

I would not want to speculate whether the person be evading a ban or block or whether they be unlikely honestly to answer, but a reply would be informative.

The editor compared this RfA, which has only my opposition, to torture! His comparison already moved beyond pathos skipping bathos into hysteria. Consider my question as a humble attempt at helping Nick Bottom return to normal form. :)

 Kiefer.Wolfowitz 15:07, 26 March 2012 (UTC)

Indeed, I believe that torture in this case is more than a little excessive on the wording! I believe SW is doing exceptionally well, which shows how much further he's come - I opposed last time but didn't feel the need to this time. I have had a dream, past the wit of man to say what dream it was. At this point I couldn't give a Puck. Worm · (talk) 15:18, 26 March 2012 (UTC)

Well said, sir! :D  Kiefer.Wolfowitz 15:21, 26 March 2012 (UTC)

RE: Freedom House

saw your comment on my talk page but im not sure what you want me to do? A 2O in what?Lihaas (talk) 15:49, 26 March 2012 (UTC)

Hi Lihaas!

I reverted about 11 edits. The last 5 or so were by a very reasonable editor, who has been very good at working out a consensus. I haven't heard from the POV-pushing editor of the middle 5, or the student who incorporated an essay. I was afraid that all 3 would go bananas...! False alarm,  Kiefer.Wolfowitz 15:53, 26 March 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 26 March 2012

• News and notes: Controversial content saga continues, while the Foundation tries to engage editors with merchandising and restructuring

• WikiProject report: WikiProject Rock Music

• Featured content: Malfunctioning sharks, toothcombs and a famous mother: featured content for the week

• Arbitration report: Race and intelligence review at evidence, article titles closed

• Recent research: Predicting admin elections; studying flagged revision debates; classifying editor interactions; and collecting the Misplaced Pages literature

• Education report: Universities unite for GLAM; and High Schools get their due.

• Technology report: A busy week: Git switchover, mobile site upgraded, and still time for three security releases

• Read this Signpost in full
• Single-page
• Unsubscribe
• EdwardsBot (talk) 00:22, 27 March 2012 (UTC)

Hi, KW - and please take part in discussion on your edit

Here. Same good old FH:) KR, FeelSunny (talk) 16:01, 27 March 2012 (UTC)

Thanks!

I'm rather constrained for time so was blunter than usual! ;)  Kiefer.Wolfowitz 16:12, 27 March 2012 (UTC)

Afd

Hi Kiefer, I saw that there is an Afd open about a statistics related topic, and the article is flagged as "needing attention from an expert". Since I see you know a lot about statistics, if you're interested, you may want to look at Restricted randomization. (Note: I haven't !voted in the discussion and have no real opinion either way about the subject.) Mark Arsten (talk) 17:22, 27 March 2012 (UTC)

Thanks!

I saw it earlier on the math-stats project(s), and meant to have a look.

Cheers,  Kiefer.Wolfowitz 18:08, 27 March 2012 (UTC)

Category:Yes album covers

Category:Yes album covers, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 04:22, 30 March 2012 (UTC)

"All I know can be shown by your acceptance of the facts there shown before you

Take what I say in a different way and it's easy to say that this is all confusion"

Jon Anderson, "Starship Trooper", Yes,

Please make yourself redundant from the redundant task of moving "Yes album covers" to the redundant "Yes (band) album covers", which is redundant because no other Misplaced Pages Yeses have album covers.

Sincerely,  Kiefer.Wolfowitz 08:27, 30 March 2012 (UTC)

Does mention without link (ordinarily) prohibit a See also?

Hi Kiefer!

Some time ago, here, you removed a See also link to Riemann surfaces. You kindly wrote a brief explanation, with a reference:

RS are mentioned in article, so cannot go in See also section, per WP:MOS

However, when I glanced through WP:MOS, I found nothing about this subject on its main page; but I did find something on its layout subpage, namely the following:

As a general rule the "See also" section should not repeat links which appear in the article's body or its navigation boxes.

(See WP:ALSO!) Is this what you were referring to, or did I miss some other text?

Note, that indeed Riemann surfaces are mentioned once in Multivariate function Multivalued function , but that there is no link to this article. Best regards, JoergenB (talk) 13:31, 1 April 2012 (UTC)

Hi JoergenB!

I think so. It seems that I over-stated the guideline, which suggests not linking (rather than prohibiting such links).

For the multivalued function article, I think it would be useful to link Riemann surface where it appears.

If you look at the journal Set-Valued Analysis (which is edited by Mordukhovich or Wets, I believe), you can see that it neglects Riemann surfaces. Perhaps I am following that example?

Thank you for your understanding and for your gracious words. I am in a rush today, moving again....

Best regards,  Kiefer.Wolfowitz 14:39, 1 April 2012 (UTC)

So, this isn't my field of expertise; I'm more of an algebraist and cominatorian; but I've got the impression that Riemann surfaces are more of an alternative to multivalued functions than a subitem. In multivariate functions (or set-valued functions), you manipulate the range (e.g., simultaneously considering two different "square roots", or the set of both roots as one value, for every complex number); in the alternative, you replace the domain by a Riemann surface (or by a higher dimensional complex manifold), and as the result get an ordinary univariate function (e.g., by defining the square root on the twofold helix joined at the origin). If I've understood this correctly, it might motivate a brief section on Riemann surfaces in Multivalued function. However, as the article is organised now, I think that a "See also" is more natural than a somewhat obscure link in the middle of the example section. JoergenB (talk) 15:32, 2 April 2012 (UTC)

My judgment is that set-valued analysis has many more related topics, epigraphs, subdifferentials, level sets, tangent sets, cotangent sets, normal sets, etc. I have difficulty imagining a reader moving first from multivalued functions to Riemann surfaces, unless the reader were an editor depositing the link from the former to the latter (the editor's interest). I think that some Swedes have written theses generalizing convex analysis to complex spaces, with little results to show for their work, alas, and essentially no international interest. I am arguing against your adding the link. I am not stating that I shall remove it. Sincerely,  Kiefer.Wolfowitz 16:21, 2 April 2012 (UTC)

Well, as I mentioned, I do not belong to the "pluricomplex school", and I have no opinion on the relative merits of different subfields of complex analysis. (I mentioned the higher dimensional counterparts for completeness.) Since I also think that analysists would be better editors for a potential new section on alternative approaches, I'll defer this to your opinion. Thus, I only have added a link to the only occurrence of RS in the article, to wit,

... thus reducing the multilayered Riemann surface of the function to a single layer'

although I still think that this could be fairly confusing. (As I wrote, the function on the Riemann surface is not technically the same thing as the multivalued function on (a subset of) C.)

If you think this improves the understanding, you might add a {{further}} to the examples section. JoergenB (talk) 19:08, 2 April 2012 (UTC)

I'm sure that we could ask JEB and get a very strong opinion ... probably citing Beurling or having hallowed refererence to "hårdsvenskanalysis" (or was it "svensk hårdanalysis"?). ;)

There was a nice Russian monograph using residue calculus of multivariate generating functions that the AMS translated and published, that you should look at. (I like positivity: Sedgewick & the French guy's 2nd volume had a long section on Pringsheim's theorem; I don't remember whether it mentioned Boas's correction of Pringsheim's proof? The Generatingfunctionology books has a section on Hayman's method: You might look at Paul R. Rosenboom, who had a nice probabilistic paper on it, that seemed never to have been read, when I looked 10 years ago.)  Kiefer.Wolfowitz 20:38, 2 April 2012 (UTC)

Today, I happened to run into Jaja (alias Professor emeritus Björk) in our department pentry, and did ask him... Yes, he (of course) had some things to say about Beurling, but actually said more about Weyl's contribution.

However, Jaja agreed with my opinion that RS should be described more as an alternative to multivalued functions, than as a property of them. He also pointed out that a certain multivalued function corresponds not to a RS, but to a certain meromorphic function on a certain RS. JoergenB (talk) 15:54, 4 April 2012 (UTC)

Hej Jörgen!

Lucky you! He's a very interesting personality, especially scientific, able to discuss with depth and originality on many many topics, of each of which I know very little. A friend of mine said he was very valuable on hiring committees because of his ability to evaluate algebraic and analytic contributions. He would be among the world's top 20 experts on discussing algebraic analysis, I would guess.

Another interesting fellow missing the E in JEB has similar , and has a nice paper on sums of sets, which is described in Krantz and Park, I think; a related question appears in a paper by C.O. Kiselmann. Did you know that sums of semi-analytic sets in the plane can have boundaries that are polynomial of surprisingly small degree? (Check the details!) I endorse COK as another interesting personality, in every way! Get to know him!

Come to think of it, I should shut my mouth, because you know all this stuff far better than me, if you are whom I think you are. If you like to relax in the commutative region of algebra, you might like looking at Shapley-Folkman theorem and think of Newton polytopes, etc.

Keep up the good work!

Best regards,  Kiefer.Wolfowitz 18:41, 4 April 2012 (UTC)

DYK for John Rainwater

On 1 April 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article John Rainwater, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that a University of Washington fake mathematician created as a student prank became the author of several well-received papers in research journals? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

The DYK project (nominate) 16:02, 1 April 2012 (UTC)

• A dull hook for dullards.  Kiefer.Wolfowitz 19:13, 1 April 2012 (UTC)

QUACK

The Signpost: 02 April 2012

• Interview: An introduction to movement roles

• Arbitration analysis: Case review: TimidGuy ban appeal

• News and notes: Berlin reforms to movement structures, Wikidata launches with fanfare, and Misplaced Pages's day of mischief

• WikiProject report: The Signpost scoops The Signpost

• Featured content: Snakes, misnamed chapels, and emptiness: featured content this week

• Arbitration report: Race and intelligence review in third week, one open case

• Technology report: Somewhere amongst the endless discussions about Gerrit lie details of hackathons, performance blips explained and more

• Read this Signpost in full
• Single-page
• Unsubscribe
• EdwardsBot (talk) 07:04, 3 April 2012 (UTC)

WP:ANI notice

Related to my recent post here which was removed, I've transferred my concerns regarding the matter to the administrators' noticeboard. The direct link to the posting is here. Good Ol’factory 22:17, 3 April 2012 (UTC)

2*3*5. Playing the numbers game, e.g. by choosing 3 from "32, 33, 43, 46" is ill-advised.

Wow! SW certainly writes on civility with authority.

You described my response as a "put down". In fact, I expressed a wish that you have a record of similar concerns about the content of Misplaced Pages.  Kiefer.Wolfowitz 18:48, 4 April 2012 (UTC)

Per this ANI discussion, I have just blocked you for a week due to an ongoing pattern of incivility. If you want to appeal this block, you can do so using the {{unblock}} template. Salvio 23:49, 4 April 2012 (UTC)

Salvio,

I had expected more from you. I suggest you find yourself a better set of friends, if you wish to avoid going with the crowd and making further dumb decisions.

 Kiefer.Wolfowitz 07:45, 5 April 2012 (UTC)

Hi Kiefer, I know this entire situation is probably upsetting for you and all, and I'm probably not someone you want to hear from—but really, comments like the above don't help the situation, and they probably only do harm. For one, they might upset Salvio, who obviously thinks he is doing the right thing; but even more significantly, for users sitting on the fence about whether you should have been blocked or not, your comments will not give them a good impression of you and they might probably tilt general opinion against you in favour of supporting the block that was imposed. Just try to be polite to other users—it's not too hard once you get going. You don't have to be a perfect gentleman and you don't have to change your personality, but you do have to try to be less confrontational. Just don't belittle others and you're mostly there. Good Ol’factory 07:54, 5 April 2012 (UTC)

G. Olfactory,

Please read what you wrote and revise accordingly. Cannot you think of any counter-examples to "... probably thinks he is doing the right thing" to being a relevant, good statement? (Hint: Can you imagine anybody committing a mistake while believing that they were doing the right thing?)

Anybody who favors this block has the opinion of an idiot, and I would wish that this condition would be fleeting for you and Mario, for my sake.  Kiefer.Wolfowitz 08:02, 5 April 2012 (UTC)

OK, I was just trying to help out. I suggest you take the time to reflect on how you might want to adjust your approach. I know you're upset, but you can't really write the types of things you have been writing about other editors and remain an editor on a collaborative project like WP. Just sayin'. Good Ol’factory 08:10, 5 April 2012 (UTC)

G. Olfactory,

You still have not removed bullshit accusations from the ANI discussion, even after Drmies's comment and my drawing attention to Elen's discussion. At least half of your diffs were bullshit. With such behavior, you should block yourself, per WP:NPA. Until you do, you have no credibility. Just as Salvio has lost credibility with this schoolyard bullying.  Kiefer.Wolfowitz 08:07, 5 April 2012 (UTC)

I did address that issue later on in the thread. Good Ol’factory 08:10, 5 April 2012 (UTC)

Category:Yes (band) Yes Album album covers

The Yes Album has had at least 2 different album covers, e.g. front and back cover-art.

Would somebody please contest the speedy deletion of the category.

Please remove the entry for a cover of the debut album, Yes, which is not alternative cover art for The Yes Album. (My mistake) Somebody should create the category, Category:Yes (band) Yes album album covers though.

Thanks!  Kiefer.Wolfowitz 08:02, 5 April 2012 (UTC)

Would you like me to restore the category? If I did, I would tag it with a speedy deletion template, then we could see if another admin agreed with deletion. I'd be happy to copy any comments to the talkpage that you might have in justifying the existence of the category. I think you probably know, though, that creating a category for album art of a single album is not a usual way of categorizing album art. I took your creation of the category as a facetious protest against the proposed renaming of Category:Yes album covers, not as a serious creation—hence the rationale of "patent nonsense". I thought you were just being silly to make a point. But maybe not. Good Ol’factory 08:18, 5 April 2012 (UTC)

As I have suggested (at least) elsewhere, the category was inspired by the renaming of the "Yes album covers" to "Yes (album) album covers", a renaming about which whose wisdom we have agreed to disagree. I find it amusing, of course. (I have trouble understanding persons who find all of reality humorless, or whose understanding of "brilliant prose" goes against the Encyclopedic tradition: My discussion of Dutch book arguments in Bayesian probability linked to problem gambling, and this link was reverted because it seemed to be a joke.)

However, I have enough self-discipline not to create nonsensical categories.

I can propose redundant categories as a rhetorical ploy to make the proposer of the Yes-renaming a bit uncomfortable, or one hopes to smile at the occasional absurdities consequent upon consistent application of a WP heuristic. The "Yes (band) (band)" suggestion was horseplay, which you cited as grounds for blocking at ANI.  Kiefer.Wolfowitz 08:58, 5 April 2012 (UTC)

Category:American socialist organizations opposed to communism

Category:American socialist organizations opposed to communism, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 08:32, 5 April 2012 (UTC)

Koafv/Justin,

Please stop nominating categories I created for re-naming while you know that I cannot participate in the discussion.

"Anti-Communist" has negative connotations, unfortunately, because of propaganda by communists and anti-anti-communists. Thus, the use of "anti-communist" carries a considerable POV burden.

"Opposed to Communism" is descriptive and NPOV.

Please past my remarks to the discussion.

 Kiefer.Wolfowitz 08:42, 5 April 2012 (UTC)

Category:Ken Batcher

Category:Ken Batcher, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 08:37, 5 April 2012 (UTC)

Again, please stop nominating categories for discussion, i.e. deletion, when I cannot participate.

Perceptions do matter. You may wish to review Pesky's comments about your repeated category manipulation---perhaps recalling my defense of your good faith.

Regarding Batcher:

Batcher is associated with a number of other important computer science topics, e.g. the Goodyear Massively Parallel Computer (at least one), associative computing, etc. WP doesn't have articles on many of these topics. See the description of his research at his (Computer-Science Nobel Prize) award. Hillis's book on the MPP called Batcher the original MPP hacker. That said, a rename may be advisable, e.g. to "works of Batcher".

 Kiefer.Wolfowitz 08:49, 5 April 2012 (UTC)