Revision as of 04:06, 16 February 2012 editSineBot (talk | contribs)Bots2,555,842 editsm Dating comment by Gorgrave - "→First effort: "← Previous edit | Revision as of 13:20, 5 April 2012 edit undo173.22.215.234 (talk) →IMPIETY IS DEATH METALNext edit → | ||
(10 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{WikiProject Black Metal|class=start|importance=low}} | {{WikiProject Black Metal|class=start|importance=low}} | ||
{{WikiProject Metal|class=|importance=}} | {{WikiProject Metal|class=|importance=}} | ||
==IMPIETY IS DEATH METAL== | |||
Stop changing their genre, that is ridiculous. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 11:54, 5 April 2012 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
:Please find a ] then. ] (]) 12:09, 5 April 2012 (UTC) | |||
done. and rock detector is hardly reliable if metal archives isnt. are you kidding? <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 12:30, 5 April 2012 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
:Rockdetector passes ] on the basis of having had its material printed elsewhere by an independent, third-party source (in this case Cherry Red). Metal Archives has not, and as such fails the criteria. I am not going to get into an edit war with you over this; it is perfectly simple - do not add unsourced genres to infoboxes. As it is, I am informing you as a courtesy that if you continue I will report you as a persitant ]. ] (]) 12:40, 5 April 2012 (UTC) | |||
This is insane dude. Allmusic lists them as death metal. Your source, allmusic, lists them as death metal. ALL MUSIC. LISTS. THEM. AS. DEATH. METAL. anus.com/Deathmetal.org, one of the most scholarly sites on the web, lists them as death metal and they've been reprinted elsewhere, metal-archives.com passes the good faith common standard. Knock it off. Seriously. Youtube them. Your user name is blackmetalbaz, I assume you have a rudimentary understanding of metal. Report me. Whoever views the report will see your own sources list them as death metal. Knock this the flying fuck off. | |||
:First off, please read ]. Secondly, we don't use the Allmusic genre lists, we only use the biographies. Thirdly, Metal Archives are never used for genres, and Anus (one of the "most scholarly sites on the web") fails ] by a country mile; see their for further details. Listening to them on Youtube to establish genre would obviously contravene ] and ]. 12:55, 5 April 2012 (UTC) | |||
Look on any album review posted on the web about this band. This is one of the worst, most arbitrary arguments I've ever engaged it. Is this a situation where you're simply trying to be right? Remove your goofball personal motivations from the frame. The band is musically death metal. They are popularly known as death metal. Don't undermind the credibility of this place to win an argument you never really won. My lawd. | |||
==First effort== | ==First effort== | ||
This is my first effort at an Impiety page... it obviously needs a fair bit of work. The bio is far too long (it's a sort of amalgam of info from Allmusic, Rockdetector and their own website). At the moment it's overly reliant on listing line-up changes and could do with breaking into sub-sections. The article could also do with more references, such as interviews, reviews etc. from magazines. On the plus side, notability shouldn't be a problem with multiple releases on notable labels, multiple international tours, and finding further sources should be a doddle... there's already a decent-size Allmusic and Rockdetector article, and a Google search for "Impiety +"black metal" gets something like 180,000 hits. I'll come back to this later but right now, I'm feeling a bit knackered :) ] (]) 21:48, 12 November 2008 (UTC) | This is my first effort at an Impiety page... it obviously needs a fair bit of work. The bio is far too long (it's a sort of amalgam of info from Allmusic, Rockdetector and their own website). At the moment it's overly reliant on listing line-up changes and could do with breaking into sub-sections. The article could also do with more references, such as interviews, reviews etc. from magazines. On the plus side, notability shouldn't be a problem with multiple releases on notable labels, multiple international tours, and finding further sources should be a doddle... there's already a decent-size Allmusic and Rockdetector article, and a Google search for "Impiety +"black metal" gets something like 180,000 hits. I'll come back to this later but right now, I'm feeling a bit knackered :) ] (]) 21:48, 12 November 2008 (UTC) | ||
How are you the one who wrote anything about this band? Dont you have to know the subject you're writing on? <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 12:37, 5 April 2012 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
==Update== | ==Update== |
Revision as of 13:20, 5 April 2012
Black Metal (inactive) | ||||
|
Metal Unassessed | |||||||
|
IMPIETY IS DEATH METAL
Stop changing their genre, that is ridiculous. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.22.215.234 (talk) 11:54, 5 April 2012 (UTC)
- Please find a reliable source then. Blackmetalbaz (talk) 12:09, 5 April 2012 (UTC)
done. and rock detector is hardly reliable if metal archives isnt. are you kidding? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.22.215.234 (talk) 12:30, 5 April 2012 (UTC)
- Rockdetector passes WP:RS on the basis of having had its material printed elsewhere by an independent, third-party source (in this case Cherry Red). Metal Archives has not, and as such fails the criteria. I am not going to get into an edit war with you over this; it is perfectly simple - do not add unsourced genres to infoboxes. As it is, I am informing you as a courtesy that if you continue I will report you as a persitant genre-warrior. Blackmetalbaz (talk) 12:40, 5 April 2012 (UTC)
This is insane dude. Allmusic lists them as death metal. Your source, allmusic, lists them as death metal. ALL MUSIC. LISTS. THEM. AS. DEATH. METAL. anus.com/Deathmetal.org, one of the most scholarly sites on the web, lists them as death metal and they've been reprinted elsewhere, metal-archives.com passes the good faith common standard. Knock it off. Seriously. Youtube them. Your user name is blackmetalbaz, I assume you have a rudimentary understanding of metal. Report me. Whoever views the report will see your own sources list them as death metal. Knock this the flying fuck off.
- First off, please read WP:CIVIL. Secondly, we don't use the Allmusic genre lists, we only use the biographies. Thirdly, Metal Archives are never used for genres, and Anus (one of the "most scholarly sites on the web") fails WP:RS by a country mile; see their deletion log for further details. Listening to them on Youtube to establish genre would obviously contravene WP:OR and WP:NPOV. 12:55, 5 April 2012 (UTC)
Look on any album review posted on the web about this band. This is one of the worst, most arbitrary arguments I've ever engaged it. Is this a situation where you're simply trying to be right? Remove your goofball personal motivations from the frame. The band is musically death metal. They are popularly known as death metal. Don't undermind the credibility of this place to win an argument you never really won. My lawd.
First effort
This is my first effort at an Impiety page... it obviously needs a fair bit of work. The bio is far too long (it's a sort of amalgam of info from Allmusic, Rockdetector and their own website). At the moment it's overly reliant on listing line-up changes and could do with breaking into sub-sections. The article could also do with more references, such as interviews, reviews etc. from magazines. On the plus side, notability shouldn't be a problem with multiple releases on notable labels, multiple international tours, and finding further sources should be a doddle... there's already a decent-size Allmusic and Rockdetector article, and a Google search for "Impiety +"black metal" gets something like 180,000 hits. I'll come back to this later but right now, I'm feeling a bit knackered :) Blackmetalbaz (talk) 21:48, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
How are you the one who wrote anything about this band? Dont you have to know the subject you're writing on? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.22.215.234 (talk) 12:37, 5 April 2012 (UTC)
Update
Official Impiety website is a bit outdated but still a useful source for those who wanted to check out their discography. I edited the line up because now Impiety lose two of their guitarists to be replaced by Nizam Aziz. This is not mentioned anywhere on their official site. Hence, it's outdated. Their official page on Facebook is regularly updated. If you have any doubts, please add the frontman yourself; his name on FB is Shyaithan Kommand. They are about to release their eighth studio album entitled Ravage and Conquer. So I will update this page accordingly. User:Gorgrave —Preceding undated comment added 04:05, 16 February 2012 (UTC).
Categories: