Misplaced Pages

User talk:Chaotic Void: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactivelyContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 06:28, 8 April 2012 editGogo Dodo (talk | contribs)Administrators197,922 edits →April 2014: new section  Latest revision as of 07:33, 8 April 2012 edit undoChaotic Void (talk | contribs)7 edits thankyou 
(4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
== April 2014 == == April 2012 ==
{{unblock reviewed|1= I can already see that page has some problematic edits to it. I removed it with my first edit. The edit I'm sure you are questioning it my second. If I did this correctly you will see I tried to go back to the same edit make by the robot. http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Frank_Iero&diff=486211285&oldid=486210981 I tried to fix it in my third edit, but it did not seem to help. My 4th edit seemed to help. I thought the vandalism was recent, but you fixed it by going back to an edit made last week. I'm sorry. ] (]) 06:49, 8 April 2012 (UTC)|accept=See below.}}


:Actually, as another admin pointed out to me, I never actually blocked you. I only notified that I had blocked you. However, upon further consideration, I do believe that you were trying to correct the rapid vandalism by anonymous editors that was going on with the article. Please accept my sincerest apologies for grouping you in with all of editors trying to attack Frank Iero. -- ] (]) 07:19, 8 April 2012 (UTC)
] This is your '''only warning'''; if you ] Misplaced Pages again, you may be '''] without further notice'''. <!-- Template:uw-vandalism4im --><!-- Template:uw-cluebotwarning4 --> -- ] (]) 06:28, 8 April 2012 (UTC)

::I understand. Thank you for reviewing my request. ] (]) 07:33, 8 April 2012 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 07:33, 8 April 2012

April 2012

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Chaotic Void (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I can already see that page has some problematic edits to it. I removed it with my first edit. The edit I'm sure you are questioning it my second. If I did this correctly you will see I tried to go back to the same edit make by the robot. http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Frank_Iero&diff=486211285&oldid=486210981 I tried to fix it in my third edit, but it did not seem to help. My 4th edit seemed to help. I thought the vandalism was recent, but you fixed it by going back to an edit made last week. I'm sorry. Chaotic Void (talk) 06:49, 8 April 2012 (UTC)

Accept reason:

See below.

Actually, as another admin pointed out to me, I never actually blocked you. I only notified that I had blocked you. However, upon further consideration, I do believe that you were trying to correct the rapid vandalism by anonymous editors that was going on with the article. Please accept my sincerest apologies for grouping you in with all of editors trying to attack Frank Iero. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 07:19, 8 April 2012 (UTC)
I understand. Thank you for reviewing my request. Chaotic Void (talk) 07:33, 8 April 2012 (UTC)