Misplaced Pages

Template:Dubious/doc: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Template:Dubious Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 02:48, 17 April 2012 editChealer (talk | contribs)10,808 edits Partially undid revision 480042900 by Debresser (talk) (unjustified parts)← Previous edit Revision as of 14:16, 17 April 2012 edit undoDebresser (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers, Template editors110,467 edits Undid revision 487772828 by Chealer (talk) Undo undo. Per WP:BRD this should have been taken to the talkpage. In essence, this editor is trying to cast doubt onto the obvious.Next edit →
Line 7: Line 7:
For an entire disputed article or section, use {{Tl|Disputed}} or {{Tl|Disputed-section}}. For an entire disputed article or section, use {{Tl|Disputed}} or {{Tl|Disputed-section}}.


It is best to simultaneously try to resolve the dispute on the talk page.{{Contradiction-inline|According to the first sentence, there isn't necessarily a dispute. See Talk}} To refer to a specific talk page section, use {{Tlx|Dubious|talk page section name}}. If the dispute does not have a talk page section yet (e.g. because it has been argued in edit summaries), please create one. It is best to simultaneously try to resolve the dispute on the talk page. To refer to a specific talk page section, use {{Tlx|Dubious|talk page section name}}. If the dispute does not have a talk page section yet (e.g. because it has been argued in edit summaries), please create one.


This template is ''not'' for flagging items that an editor ''simply'' thinks might be incorrect or unsourced. This is what {{Tl|Citation needed}} is for. It is for sourced statements subject to dispute or probable dispute among editors because of insufficent sourcing, e.g. due to conflicting sources, doubts about a source's reliability, or concerns that source has been misinterpreted. The purposes of this template are: This template is ''not'' for flagging items that an editor simply thinks might be incorrect or unsourced. This is what {{Tl|Citation needed}} is for. It is for sourced statements subject to dispute or probable dispute among editors because of insufficent sourcing, e.g. due to conflicting sources, doubts about a source's reliability, or concerns that source has been misinterpreted. The purposes of this template are:
* To warn readers that a statement in the article may not be accurate * To warn readers that a statement in the article may not be accurate
* To alert editors that additional sources need to be found, to ascertain which of the conflicting views in the dispute is more authoritative * To alert editors that additional sources need to be found, to ascertain which of the conflicting views in the dispute is more authoritative


Do not add this template to a page more than a reasonable number of times. Please consider using one of the other templates mentioned below instead. Do not add this template to a page more than a reasonable number of times. Please consider using one of the other templates mentioned below instead.


=== Parameters === === Parameters ===

Revision as of 14:16, 17 April 2012

This is a documentation subpage for Template:Dubious.
It may contain usage information, categories and other content that is not part of the original template page.

Usage

Add {{Dubious}} after a specific statement or alleged fact that is subject to dispute (your own or someone else's), most often uncertainty regarding the source. This template's wording is milder than that of {{Disputed-inline}}, which indicates that the material in question is definitely disputed on the talk page already.

For an entire disputed article or section, use {{Disputed}} or {{Disputed-section}}.

It is best to simultaneously try to resolve the dispute on the talk page. To refer to a specific talk page section, use {{Dubious|talk page section name}}. If the dispute does not have a talk page section yet (e.g. because it has been argued in edit summaries), please create one.

This template is not for flagging items that an editor simply thinks might be incorrect or unsourced. This is what {{Citation needed}} is for. It is for sourced statements subject to dispute or probable dispute among editors because of insufficent sourcing, e.g. due to conflicting sources, doubts about a source's reliability, or concerns that source has been misinterpreted. The purposes of this template are:

  • To warn readers that a statement in the article may not be accurate
  • To alert editors that additional sources need to be found, to ascertain which of the conflicting views in the dispute is more authoritative

Do not add this template to a page more than a reasonable number of times. Please consider using one of the other templates mentioned below instead.

Parameters

  • date: the month and year when the template was added. Like this: {{Dubious|date=January 2025}}
  • It is also common to use a dummy |reason= parameter to add a little extra explanation.

See also

Misplaced Pages project pages

Templates

Main page: Misplaced Pages:Template index/Disputes

Disputed factual accuracy

See also: Category:Dispute templates

Both accuracy and POV

Disputed neutrality (POV)

See also: Category:Neutrality templates

Wiki

Citation and verifiability article maintenance templates
Sourcing
BLP-specific
Topic specific
Dispute-related
Citation improvements
General advice
Inline cleanup tags
Attribution
Clarity
Miscellaneous
Neutrality
Precision
Excessive
Time-sensitivity
Verifiability
Dubious
Bare URLs
Incomplete or broken citation
Missing or problematic reference
Wording
General advice
Toolbox
Templates
Welcome
Vandalism
Content removal
Check
Dispute
Delete
Community
Protocols
Main
Stats
External
Misplaced Pages:Directories and indexes
Inline cleanup tags
Attribution
Clarity
Miscellaneous
Neutrality
Precision
Excessive
Time-sensitivity
Verifiability
Dubious
Bare URLs
Incomplete or broken citation
Missing or problematic reference
Wording
General advice