| Revision as of 19:11, 22 April 2012 editAntandrus (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators111,294 edits I do believe Andy Mabbett is edit warring again, after all these years← Previous edit | Revision as of 19:20, 22 April 2012 edit undoPigsonthewing (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Event coordinators, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, File movers, IP block exemptions, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers, Template editors266,337 edits →Dishonest comment in TfD summary box: new sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
| :Moments later: Please remove the speedy deletion template quickly, as it now shows up on all pages using the template.Thank you, --] (]) 20:46, 20 April 2012 (UTC) | :Moments later: Please remove the speedy deletion template quickly, as it now shows up on all pages using the template.Thank you, --] (]) 20:46, 20 April 2012 (UTC) | ||
| == Dishonest comment in TfD summary box == | |||
| The claim above that the 17 December 2011 TfD "''decision was later reversed by deleting admin because of lack of notification of interested parties and discussion''" is a lie (no diffs can be provided to substantiate it). The closing admin made no such judgement, nor action; they only recreate the template in userspace and it was only then recreated in template-space by another editor. The bogus comment should be removed. <span class="vcard"><span class="fn">]</span> (<span class="nickname">Pigsonthewing</span>); ]; ]</span> 19:20, 22 April 2012 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 19:20, 22 April 2012
 | This template was considered for deletion on 2011 December 17. The result of the discussion was "delete, but decision was later reversed by deleting admin because of lack of notification of interested parties and discussion". |
| This page was nominated at Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion on 22 March 2012. The result of the discussion was "Keep" (as redirect to {{Infobox person}}). |
| This template was considered for deletion on 2012 April 20. The result of the discussion was "speedy keep". |
Contested deletion
This page should not be speedily deleted because this template is the result of extensive discussion at the classical composers project. It was deleted on the sly, without alerting anyone on the project of the intent to delete it. In accordance with Misplaced Pages policy, I consulted with the deleting admin, User:Plastikspork, who restored it to my userspace, and suggested that I restore it pending further discussion at the project. That discussion has taken place, and I have restored it.
You can read the discussions regarding this template at Misplaced Pages talk:WikiProject Composers.
--Ravpapa (talk) 20:19, 20 April 2012 (UTC)
- Moments later: Please remove the speedy deletion template quickly, as it now shows up on all pages using the template.Thank you, --Ravpapa (talk) 20:46, 20 April 2012 (UTC)
Dishonest comment in TfD summary box
The claim above that the 17 December 2011 TfD "decision was later reversed by deleting admin because of lack of notification of interested parties and discussion" is a lie (no diffs can be provided to substantiate it). The closing admin made no such judgement, nor action; they only recreate the template in userspace and it was only then recreated in template-space by another editor. The bogus comment should be removed. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 19:20, 22 April 2012 (UTC)