Misplaced Pages

User talk:71.178.101.2: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 19:37, 29 April 2012 edit71.178.101.2 (talk) Personal attack← Previous edit Revision as of 19:39, 29 April 2012 edit undoTimbouctou (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers71,723 edits Undid revision 489833141 by 71.178.101.2 (talk) restoring vandalism warningNext edit →
Line 1: Line 1:
==]==
Judging by your you seem to be on a crusade against the ] and are very keen to insert claims which could be contentious and controversial. More specifically, you are bent on insisting that the organisation is terrorist in character, even though you yourself have failed to present evidence of it being involved in an actual act of terrorism. You were asked to provide some at least four time in the . You then continued to post pointless cleanup tags, claiming rather vaguely that the article is a , and then you by another user from the talk page. This constitutes ] and will be reported if you continue. Please refrain from disruptive editing and edit-warring and present sources for your claims. ] (]) 19:31, 29 April 2012 (UTC)

Revision as of 19:39, 29 April 2012

Croatian Liberation Movement

Judging by your editing history you seem to be on a crusade against the Croatian Liberation Movement and are very keen to insert claims which could be contentious and controversial. More specifically, you are bent on insisting that the organisation is terrorist in character, even though you yourself have failed to present evidence of it being involved in an actual act of terrorism. You were asked to provide some at least four time in the article talk page. You then continued to post pointless cleanup tags, claiming rather vaguely that the article is a "blog and history whitewash", and then you deleted discussion replies by another user from the talk page. This constitutes disruptive behaviour and will be reported if you continue. Please refrain from disruptive editing and edit-warring and present sources for your claims. Timbouctou (talk) 19:31, 29 April 2012 (UTC)