Misplaced Pages

User talk:173.0.254.229: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 05:50, 12 May 2012 edit173.0.254.229 (talk)No edit summary← Previous edit Revision as of 05:58, 12 May 2012 edit undoDave1185 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, File movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers25,447 edits Reverted to revision 492146918 by Dave1185: apologies but this is standard notification template for anon IP editors whenever disruptive behaviour is detected, please register an account if you don't wish to get this again.... (TW)Next edit →
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Static IP|host=ip-173-0-254-229.dlknet.net|}}


==Welcome== ==Welcome==

Revision as of 05:58, 12 May 2012

Static IP addressWelcome!Last edited:
Last edited by:05:58, 12 May 2012 (UTC)
Dave1185 (talk · contribs)

Interested in becoming a regular contributor to Misplaced Pages? Create an account!

Your host, ip-173-0-254-229.dlknet.net (173.0.254.229), is registered to Netwurx Internet and is believed to be a static address used by only one connection. However, this IP address may represent more than one user, accessing the Internet via several personal computers or devices.

To have your own user pages, keep track of articles you've edited in a watchlist, and have access to a few other special features, please consider registering an account! It's fast and free.

If you are autoblocked repeatedly, contact your Internet service provider or network administrator and request it contact Wikimedia's XFF project about enabling X-Forwarded-For HTTP headers on its proxy servers so that blocks will affect only the intended user.Administrators: review contributions carefully if blocking this IP address or reverting its contributions. If a block is needed, consider a soft block using Template:Anonblock.
If vandalism is noted from this IP address, abuse reports may be sent to its network administrator for investigation.
Network administrators, to monitor this IP address for vandalism, can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.

Welcome

Hello, and welcome to Misplaced Pages!

Thank you for experimenting with Misplaced Pages. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do.

Here are a few good links for newcomers:

Here are some other hints and tips:

  • I recommend that you get a username. You don't have to log in to read or edit articles on Misplaced Pages, but creating an account is quick, free and non-intrusive, requires no personal information, and there are many benefits of having a username. (If you edit without a username, your IP address is used to identify you instead.)
  • When using talk pages, please sign your name at the end of your messages by typing four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically produce your username (or IP address) and the date.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you need help, check out Misplaced Pages:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or type {{helpme}} here on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!

Julie Chen

Instead of making unprovable proclamations about a subject's importance as you did on Julie Chen, use facts and attribution to demonstrate that importance, and also make the language a bit formal. --Abhijay (☎ Talk) (✐ Deeds) 09:13, 9 February 2012 (UTC)

Your edits to Julie Chen, AIV etc

Hi 173.0.254.229. I've declined the report at AIV because I'm happy that your edits were a good faith attempt to add content to Misplaced Pages and don't meet our definition of vandalism. However, Abhijay was correct in their initial removal of your edits. Potentially controversial information about living people must meet the highest sourcing standards as set out in our policy on biographies of living people. You have now provided a source, but although the information remains in the article it may yet be removed again. It seems questionable to me whether or not perezhilton.com meets the required standard; to retain that information you may need to be prepared to justify it as a reliable source, which might involve showing that it's been written by an reputable author who is an expert in their field, is subject to fact-checking and/or peer review, and other requirements. It might also be worth attributing it in the text (ie "According to perezhilton.com, ..."), which makes it clear to readers that we're reporting the opinion of a single source. Hope this helps, EyeSerene 10:26, 9 February 2012 (UTC)

Hello, 173.0.254.229. You have new messages at EyeSerene's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

BLP/N

I apologize for calling that information added "crap." I should have used a less inflammatory term. I have started a report at Misplaced Pages:Biographies_of_living_persons/Noticeboard#Lisa_Lampanelli which mentions you. Please make your case there. Jokestress (talk) 19:02, 8 May 2012 (UTC)

your disputed addition

Hi - I have removed your desired addition for similar reasons to the above user - as per the previous removals - low quality sources - disputed content regarding a living person , report is at the blp noticeboard WP:BLPN - please join in there and seek WP:Consensus for your disputed desired addition - thanks

Sorry about not signing - please excuse - Youreallycan 21:56, 8 May 2012 (UTC)