| Revision as of 16:26, 26 May 2012 view sourceJello carotids (talk | contribs)28 edits →26 May 2012: Clearly abuse (per WP:UP#POLEMIC) and of an alternate username.← Previous edit | Revision as of 16:30, 26 May 2012 view source Mathsci (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers66,107 edits Undid revision 494483274 by Jello carotids (talk) rv banned user Echigo moleNext edit → | ||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
| Used solely to gather accusations against opponents in various, now defunct cases. Linked back to Mathsci's main page but such an odd way as to defeat scrutiny. The oddity of the attribution and the use solely for storing attack pages makes it hard to assume good faith. Why does Mathsci need these multiple alternate accounts -- ] and ] have already reported -- if not to avoid legitimate scrutiny of his main accout? Why does he not store this stuff on his own hard drive? Why is this out-of-date material still here? ] (]) 11:27, 26 May 2012 (UTC) | Used solely to gather accusations against opponents in various, now defunct cases. Linked back to Mathsci's main page but such an odd way as to defeat scrutiny. The oddity of the attribution and the use solely for storing attack pages makes it hard to assume good faith. Why does Mathsci need these multiple alternate accounts -- ] and ] have already reported -- if not to avoid legitimate scrutiny of his main accout? Why does he not store this stuff on his own hard drive? Why is this out-of-date material still here? ] (]) 11:27, 26 May 2012 (UTC) | ||
| :Mathsci has produced no explanation of why this material needs to be under another user name or why it is retained beyond the end of the R&I Review. Clearly abuse (per ]) and of an alternate username. That is I believe the definition of sockpuppetry. As to the other accusations: no evidence beyonf Mathsci'own personal view was presented that ] was a sockpuppet of either of the users mentioned. ] (]) 16:26, 26 May 2012 (UTC) | |||
| ======<span style="font-size:150%">Comments by other users</span>====== | ======<span style="font-size:150%">Comments by other users</span>====== | ||
Revision as of 16:30, 26 May 2012
Mathsci
Mathsci (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
For archived investigations, see Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/Mathsci/Archive.
– This SPI case is open.
26 May 2012
- Suspected sockpuppets
- Mathsci (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Aixoisie (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
Used solely to gather accusations against opponents in various, now defunct cases. Linked back to Mathsci's main page but such an odd way as to defeat scrutiny. The oddity of the attribution and the use solely for storing attack pages makes it hard to assume good faith. Why does Mathsci need these multiple alternate accounts -- User:Altmathsci and User:Alternative-mathsci have already reported -- if not to avoid legitimate scrutiny of his main accout? Why does he not store this stuff on his own hard drive? Why is this out-of-date material still here? Jello carotids (talk) 11:27, 26 May 2012 (UTC)
Comments by other users
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
This is a legitimate alternative account, clearly labelled on the user page, created to gather diffs during the arbcom review and efterwards. The reporter here, as before, is a sockpuppet of the banned editor Echigo mole, who has been extensively trolling in the last few days on various high project pages. Please see Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/Echigo mole. Mathsci (talk) 16:18, 26 May 2012 (UTC)
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
Categories: