| Revision as of 06:10, 10 June 2012 view sourceMathsci (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers66,107 edits →10 June 2012← Previous edit | Revision as of 08:54, 10 June 2012 view source JBW (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators195,861 edits Blocked and tagged, ready to close.Next edit → | ||
| Line 30: | Line 30: | ||
| <!--- All comments go ABOVE this line, please. --> | <!--- All comments go ABOVE this line, please. --> | ||
| {{SPI case status}} | {{SPI case status|close}} | ||
| =====<big>10 June 2012</big>===== | =====<big>10 June 2012</big>===== | ||
| Line 49: | Line 49: | ||
| ======<span style="font-size:150%">Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</span>====== | ======<span style="font-size:150%">Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</span>====== | ||
| {{admin comment}} A clear DUCK case on behvioural grounds, further confirmed by checkuser. Blocked and tagged, ready to close. | |||
| ---- | ---- | ||
| <!--- All comments go ABOVE this line, please. --> | <!--- All comments go ABOVE this line, please. --> | ||
Revision as of 08:54, 10 June 2012
Echigo mole
Echigo mole (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Populated account categories: confirmed · suspected
Older archives were moved to an archive of the archive because of the page size and are listed below:
For archived investigations, see Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/Echigo mole/Archive.
– This SPI case is closed and will be archived shortly by an SPI clerk or checkuser.
07 June 2012
- Suspected sockpuppets
- Static web page (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Flexural strength (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
This seems to be the same editor as Static web page who was blocked by a checkuser yesterday. The edits on Jean Daret continue seamlessly from one to the other. Both accounts were created on 6 June 2012 just before they started editing the article. Echigo mole is at the moment attempting to edit articles related to Aix-en-Provence as part of his latest bout of mischief-making, which also involves generating new socks. A checkuser does not seem necessary in this case. Mathsci (talk) 07:19, 7 June 2012 (UTC)
- Note: The first account Static web page was already blocked by checkuser Alison as a sockpuppet of Echigo mole. He has admitted to running the second account Flexural strength in his unblock request . JamesBWatson probably did not notice the sockpuppet identification when he granted the unblock request. From Alison's identification, this is Echigo mole who has been starting to edit on articles related to Aix-en-Provence with a view to disruption and mischief-making. I will send an email to Alison about this. Mathsci (talk) 12:55, 8 June 2012 (UTC)
- Quite true: I did not notice the sockpuppet identification when I granted the unblock request. I have now reinstated the block. JamesBWatson (talk) 14:17, 8 June 2012 (UTC)
- Additional comment: These stubs & edit summaries (Echigo mole via the sock Flexural strength) and (Silver starfish) appear to be by the same person. Mathsci (talk) 16:20, 8 June 2012 (UTC)
Comments by other users
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
Clerk endorsed - CU Alison has already connected Static, here. Dennis Brown - 2¢ © 14:19, 8 June 2012 (UTC)
Confirmed that Static web page (talk · contribs) and Flexural strength (talk · contribs) are socks of Echigo mole. - Mailer Diablo 01:25, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
– This SPI case is closed and will be archived shortly by an SPI clerk or checkuser.
10 June 2012
- Suspected sockpuppets
- Keystone Crow (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
I am adding this report simply for the record. No action is required as the sockpuppet has already been CU blocked by Courcelles who also removed access to his user talk page. This time Echigo mole attempted to file an RfAr, which was immediately removed by Courcelles. Roger Davies already has stated that the obvious conclusion is that this was a sockpuppet of Echigo mole in asking this question, now unanswerable except through yet another sock. That it is Echigo mole is evident because no other user would list a community-banned editor in a case title. The argumentation and list of diffs in the attempted RfAr request is also identical to previous trolling posts of Echigo mole. Mathsci (talk) 06:04, 10 June 2012 (UTC)
Comments by other users
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
Administrator note A clear DUCK case on behvioural grounds, further confirmed by checkuser. Blocked and tagged, ready to close.
Categories: