| Revision as of 07:33, 13 June 2012 editDarkness Shines (talk | contribs)31,762 edits →June 2012← Previous edit | Revision as of 07:42, 13 June 2012 edit undoDarkness Shines (talk | contribs)31,762 edits →RE Mediation proposal: new sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 40: | Line 40: | ||
| voting to have me banned, vio 1 ] (]) 21:01, 11 June 2012 (UTC) | voting to have me banned, vio 1 ] (]) 21:01, 11 June 2012 (UTC) | ||
| == RE Mediation proposal == | |||
| By sunray. I will go along with a topic ban until mediation has concluded. ] (]) 07:42, 13 June 2012 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 07:42, 13 June 2012
| This is Darkness Shines's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
| Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 |
 Archives | |||||||||
|
|||||||||
|
This page has archives. Sections may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
Battle of Chawinda
This is to inform you that you are hereby banned from editing this article for a period of 2 months, for continuing to wikilawyer your way around your interaction ban with TopGun on the article, despite constant warnings to the contrary, and multiple times being told to stop trying to cut it so close. Any further editing on your part of the article will be taken as a violation of your interaction ban, and will result in a block of you, by me. You may appeal this sanction at WP:ANI. Magog the Ogre (talk) 09:58, 10 June 2012 (UTC)
- Given I have neither violated nor wiki lawyer anything I will obviously appeal your usual one sided bullshit ruling. Darkness Shines (talk) 10:02, 10 June 2012 (UTC)
- With all due respect Magog, should not you copy paste this same Ban notice on TopGun's Page ? for showing no bias, (just a thought) --DℬigXray 10:19, 10 June 2012 (UTC)
- He is incapable of that, look at the two warnings given by magog after the last ANI, see who got the blame when I had again not committed a violation. Darkness Shines (talk) 10:22, 10 June 2012 (UTC)
- @DB, I will respond to any questions you have about this on my talk page. But it is impolite to cross-talk, so I'm avoiding it. Magog the Ogre (talk) 10:37, 10 June 2012 (UTC)
- He is incapable of that, look at the two warnings given by magog after the last ANI, see who got the blame when I had again not committed a violation. Darkness Shines (talk) 10:22, 10 June 2012 (UTC)
Relax
|
Please cool down |
| Relax and cool down, your comments in a fit of anger and expletives will only worsen the situation, regards DℬigXray 15:05, 10 June 2012 (UTC) |
Please comment on Talk:List of sovereign states
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:List of sovereign states. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Misplaced Pages:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 14:16, 11 June 2012 (UTC)
June 2012
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 20:14, 11 June 2012 (UTC)
Darkness Shines (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
thete are no Iban violations by me outstanding, if so please show diffs. And should an adminwho just called for me to be banned be handing out a block. Darkness Shines (talk) 21:03, 11 June 2012 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Violation 1 is enough to get you blocked for two weeks. And, if we should choose to judge your by your own standards, given that you think this is a violation, then we can include another: (this example was as useful for maintenance of the block as the previous comment). Should we include another week for that? I'm not even going to include the countless times I cut you slack when TopGun mentioned violations on my talk page (and which other users agreed were violations). In any case, I have no problem declining this unblock because I'm sure you'll file another request as I am supposedly biased against you in the case. Magog the Ogre (talk) 23:01, 11 June 2012 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Unblock
Darkness Shines (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Diff one and two as shown Magog are not violations as it was self reverted, which would make this block purely punitive.This is not an iban vio as Magog says as it is reporting at ANI an IBAN violation and discussing IBAN violations are not a violation, they are an exemption. I have been blocked by an admin who has called for me to be banned from editing, which has now been enforced by an admin I am in dispute with on ANI. I have no IBAN violations outstanding, this block is purely punitive and needs to be overturned. Darkness Shines (talk) 07:33, 13 June 2012 (UTC)Notes:
- In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
- Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:
{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=Diff one and two as shown Magog are not violations as it was self reverted, which would make this block purely punitive.This is not an iban vio as Magog says as it is reporting at ANI an IBAN violation and discussing IBAN violations are not a violation, they are an exemption. I have been blocked by an admin who has called for me to be banned from editing, which has now been enforced by an admin I am in dispute with on ANI. I have no IBAN violations outstanding, this block is purely punitive and needs to be overturned. ] (]) 07:33, 13 June 2012 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}
If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.
{{unblock reviewed |1=Diff one and two as shown Magog are not violations as it was self reverted, which would make this block purely punitive.This is not an iban vio as Magog says as it is reporting at ANI an IBAN violation and discussing IBAN violations are not a violation, they are an exemption. I have been blocked by an admin who has called for me to be banned from editing, which has now been enforced by an admin I am in dispute with on ANI. I have no IBAN violations outstanding, this block is purely punitive and needs to be overturned. ] (]) 07:33, 13 June 2012 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}
If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:
{{unblock reviewed |1=Diff one and two as shown Magog are not violations as it was self reverted, which would make this block purely punitive.This is not an iban vio as Magog says as it is reporting at ANI an IBAN violation and discussing IBAN violations are not a violation, they are an exemption. I have been blocked by an admin who has called for me to be banned from editing, which has now been enforced by an admin I am in dispute with on ANI. I have no IBAN violations outstanding, this block is purely punitive and needs to be overturned. ] (]) 07:33, 13 June 2012 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}
Iban violations
voting to have me banned, vio 1 Darkness Shines (talk) 21:01, 11 June 2012 (UTC)
RE Mediation proposal
By sunray. I will go along with a topic ban until mediation has concluded. Darkness Shines (talk) 07:42, 13 June 2012 (UTC)
Category: