| Revision as of 18:59, 17 June 2012 editCwmhiraeth (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators138,707 edits →Peer review← Previous edit | Revision as of 09:22, 18 June 2012 edit undoSayerslle (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers15,983 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| (7 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 86: | Line 86: | ||
| :Hi! I'm very inexperienced myself, this is my first listing for review, and I've never nominated for FA, so I'm not sure what swapping means in this context? ] (]) 11:24, 15 June 2012 (UTC) | :Hi! I'm very inexperienced myself, this is my first listing for review, and I've never nominated for FA, so I'm not sure what swapping means in this context? ] (]) 11:24, 15 June 2012 (UTC) | ||
| ::Well I haven't been involved with peer review before either but am becoming more aware of what is required for FA. If you were to review Common Toad and I reviewed Dodo I expect we could both find some new perspectives on how the two articles might be improved. ] (]) 18:59, 17 June 2012 (UTC) | ::Well I haven't been involved with peer review before either but am becoming more aware of what is required for FA. If you were to review Common Toad and I reviewed Dodo I expect we could both find some new perspectives on how the two articles might be improved. ] (]) 18:59, 17 June 2012 (UTC) | ||
| ==syria== | |||
| Christians were reportedly present in early demonstrations in Homs but stopped participating in them when Islamist ] slogans were proclaimed.<ref name=BBC12feb>{{cite news|title=Syria's slide towards civil war|url=http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-16984219|accessdate=4 March 2012|newspaper=BBC|date=12 February 2012}}</ref> | |||
| do you think you fairly represented the referenced material with this edit? I couldnt find in the BBC article the emphasis you put on the material here at all. is that because I'm missing something or is it your POV editing? the article says everyone walked off in solidarity with the Xtians and as far as I could see didnt say they stopped participating full stop at all] (]) 21:32, 17 June 2012 (UTC) | |||
| :Why do you attribute those edits to me? ] (]) 21:37, 17 June 2012 (UTC) | |||
| ::because in the edit history it isnt there after you edited on 2 march and then it is there after you edited on 4 march. still, a revealing answer in its way i guess. says it all] (]) 22:19, 17 June 2012 (UTC) | |||
| :::Read whatever you want into it, who cares, seems I must have mixed up different articles or something, it was months ago. ] (]) 22:25, 17 June 2012 (UTC) | |||
| :: i read into it you are a liar and a twister for your POV - you got 'mixed up' - yeah right. fuck off. ] (]) 09:22, 18 June 2012 (UTC) | |||
| ==''Magnapaulia''== | |||
| Hello, FunkMonk! I see that you're terribly busy...however, I noticed you added a picture from the PLoS ONE ''Magnapaulia'' article, so I wondered whether you on some future date might find the time to also upload the image with the skin impressions, which seems to be of special interest (of course any other image would be very welcome also ;o)? | |||
| Greetings from a shamelessly begging --] (]) 08:38, 18 June 2012 (UTC) | |||
| :Yep, I was thinking of it myself, and would had done it anyway, I'll upload a couple today. By the way, can you think of more modifications needed for the restoration than the one I've mentioned on the talk page? ] (]) 08:40, 18 June 2012 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 09:22, 18 June 2012
| This talk page is automatically archived by MiszaBot. Any sections older than 7 days are automatically archived to Archive 6. Sections without timestamps are not archived. |
 Archives |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 7 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
Ichnobox
You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{newmessages}} template.
New Page Patrol survey
 New page patrol – Survey Invitation Hello FunkMonk! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you.
Please click HERE to take part. You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey |
Palestinian Infobox?
Hey Funk,
I was wondering why you reverted the Palestinian page infobox without discussing it at all on the talk page, we had come to a consensus earlier this year that the additional notable people we had added into the box were beneficial to the page because it helps show viewers on the page more Palestinian people and what they have accomplished.
Since being disallowed due to certain editors to include historical palestinians in the box such as early saints and what not, the box was satisfactory at best the way it was with the 16 notable Palestinians but now that you reverted it to the 8 person one it has devalued the page. Somehow the file that I created of that infobox and the infomation associated with it have been deleted, what's up with that? I saw you also noted "copyright" issues in the box that was there, but I had double checked every picture, if they were not on the wikipedia commmons with free use then they were flickr images that had usage rights usable for places such as wikipedia.
Please get back to me about this. Lazyfoxx 20:18, 6 June 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lazyfoxx (talk • contribs)
- There were several copyright violations among the images, and many of the people were simply "filler". FunkMonk (talk) 15:44, 10 June 2012 (UTC)
- Which images were copyright violations? I had double checked the images with an administrator and he did not find any violations. Your personal opinion is that they were filler but if we look at other pages such as the Lebanese, the Irish, and other ethnicities, they have many many notable people in their infoboxes that a person could also see as fillers. You could have at least opened up a discussion about it before deleting not only the picture but any of the history of the picture collage on here as well... :/ Lazyfoxx 04:22, 14 June 2012 (UTC)
- I looked at Flickr, and the licenses were ñot Commons compatible for all the new additions. FunkMonk (talk) 10:06, 14 June 2012 (UTC)
- If any of the Flickr images (I believe only 2 or 3 out of the 16 were even from flickr) were not compatible, don't you think you should have brought it up in the talk page before removing the image entirely and relinking it to a older version with less pictures? Also what do you have to say about my previous statements concerning our dubious discussions on the talk page about the infobox already? What do you have to say about having so few notables in the infobox on the Palestinian page while on other pages there are many notables, I thought you shared equal views on this issue, many of the pro-israeli editors would like to see as few notable individuals in the Palestinian box as possible. I believe the Palestinian box should follow suit with the Lebanese box in regards to the infoboxes, this seems to work best for every ethnicity page on wikipedia. Lazyfoxx 20:40, 14 June 2012 (UTC)
- The picture of Edward Said as an adult that I used is usable on wikipedia, http://www.flickr.com/photos/26585693@N05/2540741362/sizes/m/in/photostream/ see here: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.0/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lazyfoxx (talk • contribs) 20:53, 14 June 2012 (UTC)
- Which images were copyright violations? I had double checked the images with an administrator and he did not find any violations. Your personal opinion is that they were filler but if we look at other pages such as the Lebanese, the Irish, and other ethnicities, they have many many notable people in their infoboxes that a person could also see as fillers. You could have at least opened up a discussion about it before deleting not only the picture but any of the history of the picture collage on here as well... :/ Lazyfoxx 04:22, 14 June 2012 (UTC)
Talkback
Message added 05:28, 10 June 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Shrike (talk) 05:28, 10 June 2012 (UTC)
Some Redirect Help
Could I get your help/input in moving Gemuendina stuertzi and Nefudina qalibahensis to Gemuendina and Nefudina, respectively? I tried to request a technical request for the moves, but, then they simply opened up threads on the talkpages.--Mr Fink (talk) 14:50, 10 June 2012 (UTC)
- I'm only an admin in Commons, so I sadly can't do anything. There are a few other articles that should be moved too. FunkMonk (talk) 14:52, 10 June 2012 (UTC)
- Well, thank you anyhow.--Mr Fink (talk) 18:21, 10 June 2012 (UTC)
Nice images
|
The Photographer's Barnstar | |
| Thank you for adding images to Burmese eyed turtle, Indian eyed turtle and Indian black turtle Regards, SunCreator 19:17, 10 June 2012 (UTC) |
Many more turtle articles (Category:Turtle_articles_needing_photos) require a photo. Regards, SunCreator 19:17, 10 June 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks, there might be more to come. FunkMonk (talk) 19:18, 10 June 2012 (UTC)
Guillemots
Hi there FunkMonk. Has there been any discussion or consensus reached about whether the page Guillemots should redirect to Guillemot or be about the band of the same name? I'm not necessarily disputing your change, but I'm just not entirely sure at the moment if I agree with it. Just wondering. Thanks, A Thousand Doors (talk | contribs) 19:14, 14 June 2012 (UTC)
- No, but if a band was called "lions" or some such, it should still redirect to the main topic. But perhaps Guillemots itself should be a disambiguation page, the band certainly isn't the main topic with that name. FunkMonk (talk) 19:16, 14 June 2012 (UTC)
- Hmm... Fair enough. Thanks, A Thousand Doors (talk | contribs) 01:55, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
Peer review
Hello! I see you are looking for a peer review for Dodo. I have just listed the article Common toad for peer review and wondered if we could swap reviews. I am not very experienced with FAC but have recently nominated Bivalvia there and it is currently going through the process. I also recently successfully jointly nominated Western jackdaw with Casliber who is well experienced and from whom I learnt a lot. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 11:16, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
- Hi! I'm very inexperienced myself, this is my first listing for review, and I've never nominated for FA, so I'm not sure what swapping means in this context? FunkMonk (talk) 11:24, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
- Well I haven't been involved with peer review before either but am becoming more aware of what is required for FA. If you were to review Common Toad and I reviewed Dodo I expect we could both find some new perspectives on how the two articles might be improved. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 18:59, 17 June 2012 (UTC)
syria
Christians were reportedly present in early demonstrations in Homs but stopped participating in them when Islamist Salafi slogans were proclaimed.
do you think you fairly represented the referenced material with this edit? I couldnt find in the BBC article the emphasis you put on the material here at all. is that because I'm missing something or is it your POV editing? the article says everyone walked off in solidarity with the Xtians and as far as I could see didnt say they stopped participating full stop at allSayerslle (talk) 21:32, 17 June 2012 (UTC)
- Why do you attribute those edits to me? FunkMonk (talk) 21:37, 17 June 2012 (UTC)
- because in the edit history it isnt there after you edited on 2 march and then it is there after you edited on 4 march. still, a revealing answer in its way i guess. says it allSayerslle (talk) 22:19, 17 June 2012 (UTC)
- Read whatever you want into it, who cares, seems I must have mixed up different articles or something, it was months ago. FunkMonk (talk) 22:25, 17 June 2012 (UTC)
- i read into it you are a liar and a twister for your POV - you got 'mixed up' - yeah right. fuck off. Sayerslle (talk) 09:22, 18 June 2012 (UTC)
- because in the edit history it isnt there after you edited on 2 march and then it is there after you edited on 4 march. still, a revealing answer in its way i guess. says it allSayerslle (talk) 22:19, 17 June 2012 (UTC)
Magnapaulia
Hello, FunkMonk! I see that you're terribly busy...however, I noticed you added a picture from the PLoS ONE Magnapaulia article, so I wondered whether you on some future date might find the time to also upload the image with the skin impressions, which seems to be of special interest (of course any other image would be very welcome also ;o)?
Greetings from a shamelessly begging --MWAK (talk) 08:38, 18 June 2012 (UTC)
- Yep, I was thinking of it myself, and would had done it anyway, I'll upload a couple today. By the way, can you think of more modifications needed for the restoration than the one I've mentioned on the talk page? FunkMonk (talk) 08:40, 18 June 2012 (UTC)
- "Syria's slide towards civil war". BBC. 12 February 2012. Retrieved 4 March 2012.