Revision as of 00:28, 26 June 2012 editCallanecc (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Checkusers, Oversighters, Administrators73,488 edits Message re. Ed Kosiski (HG)← Previous edit | Revision as of 00:40, 26 June 2012 edit undoCallanecc (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Checkusers, Oversighters, Administrators73,488 edits Warning: Edit warring on Ed Kosiski. (TW)Next edit → | ||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
<div style=clear: both></div>] Hello, and welcome to Misplaced Pages. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Misplaced Pages, at least one of ], such as the one you made to ] with <span class="plainlinks"></span>, did not appear to be constructive, and has been ] or removed. Please use ] for any test edits you would like to make, and read the ] to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. <!-- Template:Huggle/warn-1 --><!-- Template:uw-vandalism1 -->] (]) 00:28, 26 June 2012 (UTC) | <div style=clear: both></div>] Hello, and welcome to Misplaced Pages. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Misplaced Pages, at least one of ], such as the one you made to ] with <span class="plainlinks"></span>, did not appear to be constructive, and has been ] or removed. Please use ] for any test edits you would like to make, and read the ] to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. <!-- Template:Huggle/warn-1 --><!-- Template:uw-vandalism1 -->] (]) 00:28, 26 June 2012 (UTC) | ||
] Hello, and ]. You appear to be engaged in an ] with one or more editors  according to your reverts at ]. Although repeatedly ] another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Misplaced Pages this is usually seen as obstructing the ], and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please try to reach a ] on the ]. | |||
If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be ]. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the ], which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Misplaced Pages is not acceptable in any amount, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-ewsoft --> ''Whilst this may be taken as vandalism by one or all users, I have choosen to make this point. '' ] (]) 00:40, 26 June 2012 (UTC) | |||
:''If this is a ], and you didn't make the edit, consider ] for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.''<!-- Template:Shared IP advice --> |
Revision as of 00:40, 26 June 2012
June 2012
Welcome to Misplaced Pages. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Ed Kosiski with this edit. When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Jim1138 (talk) 23:21, 18 June 2012 (UTC)
Hello, and welcome to Misplaced Pages. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Misplaced Pages, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Ed Kosiski with this edit, did not appear to be constructive, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Callanecc (talk) 00:28, 26 June 2012 (UTC)
Hello, and welcome to Misplaced Pages. You appear to be engaged in an edit war with one or more editors according to your reverts at Ed Kosiski. Although repeatedly reverting or undoing another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Misplaced Pages this is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please try to reach a consensus on the talk page.
If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Misplaced Pages is not acceptable in any amount, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. Whilst this may be taken as vandalism by one or all users, I have choosen to make this point. Callanecc (talk) 00:40, 26 June 2012 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.