Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 02:28, 25 April 2006

Archives of Old Comments

• User talk:Crzrussian/Archive 1 includes comments through March 21, 2006, inclusive.
• User talk:Crzrussian/Archive 2 includes comments through April 9, 2006, inclusive.

Re: Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Gilliver

Would you please also delete Gillivery as per nomination? Thanks. - the.crazy.russian τ ç ë 02:13, 10 April 2006 (UTC)

Hello! The article has been deleted. Regards,  (aeropagitica)  (talk)  05:42, 10 April 2006 (UTC)

Sorry, it was showing as deleted on my screen. Have now refreshed and confirmed that this has been deleted. Regards,  (aeropagitica)  (talk)  05:47, 10 April 2006 (UTC)

Thanks. - the.crazy.russian τ ç ë 05:45, 10 April 2006 (UTC)

shalom

A kosherin Freylichen Pesach!

help a jew:

http://en.wikipedia.org/Davidic_Dynasty

—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Rebbe (talk • contribs) .

Bloomberg

Hey there, thanks for the message. Personally I agree with you. But the issue here is that the critieria by which administrators evaluate an article for whether it can simply be deleted without community consensus is whether or not the article itself makes an assertion of the notability of its subject. In this case, the article's assertion of notability is that this person is Michael Bloomberg's mother -- therefore, assertion having been made, it's no longer a candidate for speedy deletion. There then arises a separate question: is this assertion of notability enough for a Misplaced Pages article? The criteria for speedy deleting an article doesn't allow one administrator to answer the second question; that's why I removed the speedy notice. Only the community can, together, decide whether or not this assertion of notability is enough to warrant its own article. You can list an article for deletion consideration here. Hope that makes sense. · Katefan0/poll 20:03, 10 April 2006 (UTC)

If there's an assertion being made, then that automatically removes it from consideration as a speedy. It's up to AFD voters, then, to decide whether the assertion of notability is a hoax, wrong, insufficient, etc. Plain and simple. An appeal to notability based off the celebrity status of one's son is definitely an assertion. Whether or not that assertion is right, wrong, inadequate or anything else is up to AFD to decide. · Katefan0/poll 20:22, 10 April 2006 (UTC)

You changed your message to include some specific examples. If, for instance, the article had said "Charlotte Bloomberg, Michael Bloomberg's mother, is an alien," then I probably would've just fixed it myself and removed the speedy tag (that would simply be vandalism). If it was an article about a person about which it was not obvious that this person has some claim to notability (however dubious) and asserted that this person was an alien with no other content or context, then it could be speedy deleted as G1: Nonsense, G3: Vandalism, A1: No context, etc. But of course this situation was far different. · Katefan0/poll 20:29, 10 April 2006 (UTC)

That's one way to fix it. =) Thanks · Katefan0/poll 20:38, 10 April 2006 (UTC)

Meir Lichtenstein

I've tried to address the issue (or punt gracefully), and I had hoped that leaving the quote at the end would get the info across without characterizing Mayor Meir directly. My question for today is that if it's not because he's "ultra-Orthodox," then why is this Mayor different from all other Mayors? Is he notable if it's just because he's Orthodox (or Jewish)? Chag kasher v'sameach! Alansohn 20:43, 10 April 2006 (UTC)

SFEDI

Yes, SFEDI is on the web at www.sfedi.org.uk and ww.sfedi.co.uk TobyJ 16:25, 11 April 2006 (UTC)

Ropshitz

Please see my comments at Talk:Ropshitz - Jmabel | Talk 04:29, 12 April 2006 (UTC)

Passover Greeting

Wishing you and your family a Happy Passover. !חג כשר ושמח -Reuvenk

Jackiey Budden

Hi there!

You have categorized Jackiey Budden as an actress. Would you really describe her in that way? She is the mother of a reality TV contestant and a tabloid figure in her own right. I wasn't sure how to categorize her myself. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Triangle e (talk • contribs)

Cardozo alums or students are putting faculty pages

Like the one for Lester Brickman; as a Fordham student aren't there any famosos professors? John wesley 16:30, 13 April 2006 (UTC)

{{illinois-school-stub}}

Is that new? I don't see that here... Amalas 20:36, 17 April 2006 (UTC)

• You do have a good point about not cluttering the tree with 50 state-specific school stubs. It's already a bit unwieldy in the geo-stub area. I see now that if I click on the Category for US-midwest-school-stub, it list the state-specific stubs on that page. I typically just use that main stub type page, but I guess I'll have to dig a little deeper from now on. Thanks for pointing this out, as I had no idea it even existed. See you around! Amalas 20:48, 17 April 2006 (UTC)

Thank you for fixing stubs on articles

Thank you for fixing stubs on articles Clerk of the Chapel and Oyster Feast. Davidbober 21:18, 17 April 2006 (UTC)

Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/List of minor Biblical figures

I respect your position, but I disagree quite firmly. BDAbramson T 22:42, 17 April 2006 (UTC)

Religious fanaticism

First, I told Loom91 on the AFD page that Catholics weren't the only religious fanatics. Second, Loom91 reverted everyone else's changes, even keeping his spelling errors. Third, Loom91 took out many of the examples, even though they're obviously relevant to the subject, show the history of the subject, and broaden the definition of the concept. I would have kept some of his changes if I honestly thought that they were worth it, but it was just a statement of what is obvious. Misplaced Pages is here to teach people things they don't already know.--Primetime 18:33, 18 April 2006 (UTC)

res ipsa loquitur

I forgot you were a law student! ⇒ SWATJester Aim _Fire! 18:33, 21 April 2006 (UTC)

So erm, what does it mean? --Rory096_(block) 19:49, 21 April 2006 (UTC)

See here: Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Religious fanaticism for an explanation of my vote. - the.crazy.russian τ ç ë 18:49, 21 April 2006 (UTC)

I fully understand the concept of res ipsa loquitur, but I was actually not referring to a tort itself, rather the words used. I was saying, the word fanaticism speaks for itself as POV. Hence, res ipsa loquitur (but not a tort, just the latin meaning.) ⇒ SWATJester Aim _Fire! 20:07, 21 April 2006 (UTC)

No worries, mate. - CrazyRussian talk/contribs/email 20:10, 21 April 2006 (UTC)

Kazxakhstan-geo-stub

Good work on Kazakhstan-geo-stub! I was hoping to have time to make one of the four proposed geo-stubs today (sadly I didn't have time in the end), but I see that one of them was done and populated. Ochen khorosho! :) Grutness...wha? 06:06, 22 April 2006 (UTC)

Avdalen

Great job. Thanks a million. - CrazyRussian talk/contribs/email 03:04, 23 April 2006 (UTC)

Ne problema. Actually, it was on my list of things to clean up someday, so your designation as needing a copyedit just moved it up. Spaceba - Williamborg 03:58, 23 April 2006 (UTC)

University stubs

OK - I'll go ahead and make them. I was waiting to see if there were any objections to my proposed scheme, since it was a bit different from the original proposal. Rescoping of the Korea one will need SFD, though, so I'll leave that one for now. Grutness...wha? 05:14, 24 April 2006 (UTC)

Dualabs Article

Please view my response on my own talk page. Thanks for your input. -- Tompsci 16:58, 24 April 2006 (UTC)

Shaul Wohl

dobre dyen tovarisch!

Shaul Whol is a real story... its my (great,great,great,great,great,great,great,great,great,) grandfather! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by JJ211219 (talk • contribs) .

Shaul Wohl

Hi, I just checked and everything in the Shaul Wohl article is already in Saul Wahl. I'm just going to turn it in to a redirect. agree?

Also the Saul Wahl article needs some work. I'l do some soon. Shlomke 21:20, 24 April 2006 (UTC)

Yasher koach. Shlomke 23:27, 24 April 2006 (UTC)

Igor Yurgens

The BBC thinks he's notable enough, as does Business Week . I'm shocked (for rhetorical purposes) that you don't acknowledge him as notable. Monicasdude 21:22, 24 April 2006 (UTC)

The Advocate's personal attacks

Looks from User talk:The Advocate that he is leaving Misplaced Pages - but I've invited him to have a nice cup of tea and a sit down in the hope of resolving the problem without blocking. I do stand ready to block him if he engages in egregious personal attacks as he has previously done. David | Talk 23:14, 24 April 2006 (UTC)

satmar

with the rapid changes and current events goin on, I assume alot of articles will be changed by the respective followers of the two sons vying for succession.

anything to do? think this would hiut the main page of current events? how do I put it there? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by JJ211219 (talk • contribs) .

Saul Wohl

if I have a megallis yuchsin showing I am his grandson, how can he be fictional? he may or may not have been king of poland... but he is not fictional...! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by JJ211219 (talk • contribs) .

Saul Wohl

thanksgevaldik! 23:28, 24 April 2006 (UTC)!!!!

Marduk incident

Yeah, I got your first message, and there wasn't any need to threaten me with a block, as I'd already decided not to continue an insult war. People give me a lot of shit for doing what I think is right and trying to clean out the garbage. Most of these comments I ignore, but I'm only human. Brian G. Crawford 01:57, 25 April 2006 (UTC)

Wonder Woman got nothing on me

• Thanks for the comment. Just as a note, Danny Lilithborne is a character I created some time ago, so the stuff on my user page is largely in character. I do have a Mistress named SpiderLady, but just Her. Thanks again! :) Danny Lilithborne 02:15, 25 April 2006 (UTC)

doglife

So you think I would have been better of with WP:AUTO then? Chick Bowen 02:20, 25 April 2006 (UTC)

anti semetic editing of satmar

can the oferning user be banned? they seem to be changing several articles with dsgusting anti semetic changes!

Hey man, I was just playing. No worries, I won't do it again.

I mean, you could take a joke or you could just be a stupid asshole, but hey, whatever. I would like point out that nothing that I said was either anti-Semetic OR "evil". I have multiple friends that are Jews and I'm sure that most of them would have thought that it was funny.

In any event, carry on, you crazy Russian prick.