Misplaced Pages

User talk:NewtonGeek: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 13:51, 17 July 2012 editNewtonGeek (talk | contribs)215 editsm →Hatted sections: Fixing style/layout errors← Previous edit Revision as of 13:17, 19 July 2012 edit undoRisker (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Autopatrolled, Checkusers, Oversighters, Administrators28,316 edits indefinitely blocking as you have demonstrated you are not here to build an encyclopediaNext edit →
Line 33: Line 33:


:I'd like to clarify that you didn't realize I did bring the hatted discussion edit to the attention of the clerks yesterday morning. I reverted the edit after consulting an administrator, Dennis Brown, and following his advice. In that conversation I indicated that I've never reverted before and wasn't sure that I was allowed to. He gave me instructions on how to do a revert. ] (]) 13:50, 17 July 2012 (UTC) :I'd like to clarify that you didn't realize I did bring the hatted discussion edit to the attention of the clerks yesterday morning. I reverted the edit after consulting an administrator, Dennis Brown, and following his advice. In that conversation I indicated that I've never reverted before and wasn't sure that I was allowed to. He gave me instructions on how to do a revert. ] (]) 13:50, 17 July 2012 (UTC)

==Not here to build an encyclopedia==
NewtonGeek, having reviewed all of your contributions, I note that you have a grand total of 166 edits, of which exactly four are to article space. It appears that you have a mistaken understanding of what Misplaced Pages is about, and are treating this site as some sort of opinion forum or social website. This is not what Misplaced Pages is for. It is time for you to move on. I am blocking you indefinitely. Unless you can persuade other administrators that you will restrict yourself to building encyclopedic content in the article space, I do not see a reason for you to continue to participate here. ] (]) 13:17, 19 July 2012 (UTC)

Revision as of 13:17, 19 July 2012

Welcome!

Some cookies to welcome you!

Welcome to Misplaced Pages, NewtonGeek! Thank you for your contributions. I am EWikist and I have been editing Misplaced Pages for some time, so if you have any questions feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Misplaced Pages:Questions or type {{helpme}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! EWikist 22:39, 27 April 2012 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, NewtonGeek. You have new messages at Theopolisme's talk page.
Message added 14:34, 28 June 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Theopolisme TALK 14:34, 28 June 2012 (UTC)

Replied again. Theopolisme TALK 14:52, 28 June 2012 (UTC)
BOO! I'm gonna stop notifying you on your talk when I reply, as I assume you have my talk watchlisted. Or not. Let me know. Theopolisme TALK 15:08, 28 June 2012 (UTC)
More info on watchlists posted in that thread. Yaris678 (talk) 18:08, 29 June 2012 (UTC)

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, NewtonGeek. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by NtheP (talk) 17:22, 28 June 2012 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template.

Wikipediocracy

I'm sorry about how some Wikipediocracy members are treating you. Not all Wikipediocracy members behave like that. --Michaeldsuarez (talk) 01:57, 1 July 2012 (UTC)

http://wikipediocracy.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=10878#p10878 – The speculation and the distrust. --Michaeldsuarez (talk) 13:15, 1 July 2012 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for the nice words on my page, I appreciate it. Carrite (talk) 23:47, 13 July 2012 (UTC)

Hatted sections

When a section in an ArbCom case has been hatted, the intention is to stop any further edits in order to reduce the possibility of increased friction. As such, this edit was unhelpful, regardless of what you felt was the provocation. If you feel someone has made an inappropriate edit then please ask a Clerk to look into the matter. SilkTork 12:56, 17 July 2012 (UTC)

I'd like to clarify that you didn't realize I did bring the hatted discussion edit to the attention of the clerks yesterday morning. I reverted the edit after consulting an administrator, Dennis Brown, and following his advice. In that conversation I indicated that I've never reverted before and wasn't sure that I was allowed to. He gave me instructions on how to do a revert. NewtonGeek (talk) 13:50, 17 July 2012 (UTC)

Not here to build an encyclopedia

NewtonGeek, having reviewed all of your contributions, I note that you have a grand total of 166 edits, of which exactly four are to article space. It appears that you have a mistaken understanding of what Misplaced Pages is about, and are treating this site as some sort of opinion forum or social website. This is not what Misplaced Pages is for. It is time for you to move on. I am blocking you indefinitely. Unless you can persuade other administrators that you will restrict yourself to building encyclopedic content in the article space, I do not see a reason for you to continue to participate here. Risker (talk) 13:17, 19 July 2012 (UTC)