| Revision as of 01:52, 19 July 2012 editBrewcrewer (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers55,075 edits →December 2011← Previous edit | Revision as of 14:16, 20 July 2012 edit undoMagog the Ogre (talk | contribs)Administrators100,727 edits →Notice of possible sanctions: .Next edit → | ||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 46: | Line 46: | ||
| ==Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion== | ==Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion== | ||
| Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at ] regarding a possible violation of Misplaced Pages's policy on ]. <!--Template:An3-notice--> Thank you. | Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at ] regarding a possible violation of Misplaced Pages's policy on ]. <!--Template:An3-notice--> Thank you. | ||
| == Notice of possible sanctions == | |||
| {| class="messagebox" style="border: 1px solid #AAA; background: ivory; padding: 0.5em; width: 100%;" | |||
| | valign="center" style="padding-left: 1px; padding-right: 0.5em;" | ] | |||
| | The ] has permitted ] to impose discretionary sanctions (information on which is at ]) on any editor who is active on pages broadly related to the ]. Discretionary sanctions can be used against an editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the ], satisfy any ], or follow any ]. If you continue to conduct yourself in this manner, you may be placed under sanctions, which can include blocks, a revert limitation, or an article ban. The Committee's full decision can be read at the "]" section of the decision page. | |||
| Please familiarise yourself with the information page at ], with the appropriate sections of ], and with the case decision page before making any further edits to the pages in question. This notice will be logged on the case decision, pursuant to the conditions of the Arbitration Committee's discretionary sanctions system. | |||
| |} ] (]) (]) 14:15, 20 July 2012 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 14:16, 20 July 2012
Edit warring at Quilliam (think tank)
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Quilliam (think tank). Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. EdJohnston (talk) 12:19, 18 May 2010 (UTC)
August 2010
Please stop adding unreferenced controversial biographical content to articles or any other Misplaced Pages page, as you did at Asra Nomani. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Misplaced Pages policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Misplaced Pages. Jayjg 00:40, 26 August 2010 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
October 2010
This is the final warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits.
The next time you violate Misplaced Pages's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory or otherwise controversial content into an article or any other Misplaced Pages page, as you did at Asra Nomani, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Jayjg 16:47, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
{{unblock|Your reason here}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Jayjg 18:27, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
March 2011
Zuhdi Jasser article - I will be removing your comments from the lead because you didn't give a source. - regards -KeptSouth (talk) 20:19, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
Adding references
Hi. I thought I would say hello and give a quick tutorial on adding refs to articles. For articles that already has an existing reference section with some refs in it all you need to do is take the url (the link) and put it between two "tags"; one at the beginning and one at the end. We first put <ref> then paste in the web address then put </ref>. So for example, you can simply put
<ref>http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/02/28/peter-king-taps-controver_n_828998.html</ref>
and that will put the link down in the ref section. There's a little more information in a full length tutorial at WP:REFSTART. Dawnseeker2000 04:49, 11 March 2011 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Jayjg 02:32, 16 March 2011 (UTC)
- You've been trying to smear her for literally months now by describing her as a "single mother" and having a "child out of wedlock". We are not stupid here; we well-understand that this is an attempt to stigmatize her in the eyes of those with traditional values. WP:BLP doesn't say you can include anything you like in an article, so long as you find one source for it. Review carefully the last paragraphs of BLP's lede, particularly the part that says "Misplaced Pages is an encyclopedia, not a tabloid: it is not Misplaced Pages's job to be sensationalist, or to be the primary vehicle for the spread of titillating claims about people's lives". Jayjg 02:35, 16 March 2011 (UTC)
May 2011
Welcome to Misplaced Pages. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Misplaced Pages, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Videos and audio recordings of Osama bin Laden with this edit, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. gz (talk) 16:16, 3 May 2011 (UTC)
July 2011
Welcome to Misplaced Pages. Please be aware of Misplaced Pages's policy that biographical information about living persons must not include unsupported or inaccurate statements. Whenever you add possibly controversial statements about a living person to an article or any other Misplaced Pages page, as you did to Zuhdi Jasser with this edit, you must include proper sources. If you don't know how to cite a source, you may want to read Misplaced Pages:Referencing for beginners for guidelines. Thank you. Falcon8765 03:38, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
Welcome to Misplaced Pages, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Misplaced Pages is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. A contribution you made to Jihad Watch appears to carry a non-neutral point of view, and your edit may have been changed or reverted to correct the problem. Please remember to observe this important core policy. Thank you. Falcon8765 00:09, 28 July 2011 (UTC)
November 2011
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Misplaced Pages, as you did at God Is Able (Hillsong album), you may be blocked from editing. Dl2000 (talk) 00:20, 9 November 2011 (UTC)
This is your last warning. The next time you violate Misplaced Pages's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Smells Like Teen Spirit, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Please don't add material such as this without refs. Thank you. Epeefleche (talk) 02:04, 9 November 2011 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
December 2011
This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Misplaced Pages, as you did at Lycoming O-360, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Ahunt (talk) 17:59, 14 December 2011 (UTC)
Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Misplaced Pages's policy on edit warring. Thank you.
Notice of possible sanctions
|
The Arbitration Committee has permitted administrators to impose discretionary sanctions (information on which is at Misplaced Pages:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions) on any editor who is active on pages broadly related to the Arab-Israeli conflict. Discretionary sanctions can be used against an editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Misplaced Pages, satisfy any standard of behavior, or follow any normal editorial process. If you continue to conduct yourself in this manner, you may be placed under sanctions, which can include blocks, a revert limitation, or an article ban. The Committee's full decision can be read at the "Final decision" section of the decision page.
Please familiarise yourself with the information page at Misplaced Pages:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions, with the appropriate sections of Misplaced Pages:Arbitration Committee/Procedures, and with the case decision page before making any further edits to the pages in question. This notice will be logged on the case decision, pursuant to the conditions of the Arbitration Committee's discretionary sanctions system. |