| Revision as of 23:06, 20 July 2012 editNableezy (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Page movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers56,174 edits →Golan← Previous edit | Revision as of 04:06, 21 July 2012 edit undoEdJohnston (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Checkusers, Administrators71,225 edits →Edit warring at Golan Heights: new sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
| :All right, if thats how you feel. I'll be taking this to an administrative board shortly and will inform you when that is done. <small style="border: 1px solid;padding:1px 3px;white-space:nowrap">''']''' - 22:41, 20 July 2012 (UTC)</small> | :All right, if thats how you feel. I'll be taking this to an administrative board shortly and will inform you when that is done. <small style="border: 1px solid;padding:1px 3px;white-space:nowrap">''']''' - 22:41, 20 July 2012 (UTC)</small> | ||
| I dont want to "fight" with you either, Id like this settled easily. I cant change it back, editors are restricted from making more than one revert a day on an article. You should change it back and seek consensus on the talk page for your change. That is how things are done here. And before you get too involved editing articles, you should read several things. First, read the following content policies: ], ], and ]. Then read ]. Finally, be aware that the Arab-Israeli conflict topic area is subject to sanctions regime that allows administrators greater latitude in dealing with user conduct issues then in other topics. One of the sanctions in place is a 1 revert rule, meaning that no user may make more than one revert a day. If you want to solve this issue properly, self-revert your edit and seek a consensus on the talk page. Otherwise, this will have to be dealt with administratively. <small style="border: 1px solid;padding:1px 3px;white-space:nowrap">''']''' - 23:06, 20 July 2012 (UTC)</small> | I dont want to "fight" with you either, Id like this settled easily. I cant change it back, editors are restricted from making more than one revert a day on an article. You should change it back and seek consensus on the talk page for your change. That is how things are done here. And before you get too involved editing articles, you should read several things. First, read the following content policies: ], ], and ]. Then read ]. Finally, be aware that the Arab-Israeli conflict topic area is subject to sanctions regime that allows administrators greater latitude in dealing with user conduct issues then in other topics. One of the sanctions in place is a 1 revert rule, meaning that no user may make more than one revert a day. If you want to solve this issue properly, self-revert your edit and seek a consensus on the talk page. Otherwise, this will have to be dealt with administratively. <small style="border: 1px solid;padding:1px 3px;white-space:nowrap">''']''' - 23:06, 20 July 2012 (UTC)</small> | ||
| == Edit warring at ] == | |||
| {{Ivmbox | |||
| | image = yes | |||
| | The ] has permitted ] to impose discretionary sanctions (information on which is at ]) on any editor who is active on pages broadly related to the ]. Discretionary sanctions can be used against an editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the ], satisfy any ], or follow any ]. If you continue to misconduct yourself on pages relating to this topic, you may be placed under sanctions, which can include blocks, a revert limitation, or an article ban. The Committee's full decision can be read at the "]" section of the decision page. | |||
| Please familiarise yourself with the information page at ], with the appropriate sections of ], and with the case decision page before making any further edits to the pages in question. This notice is given by an uninvolved administrator and will be logged on the case decision, pursuant to the conditions of the Arbitration Committee's discretionary sanctions system.<!-- Template:uw-sanctions - {{{topic|{{{t}}}}}} --> | |||
| | valign = center | |||
| | ] | |||
| }} | |||
| ] is an article where painful disputes have occurred in the past. If you continue to try to change the status of the ] without getting broad consensus for your changes, your actions may be reviewed by administrators. Since the article is under a ] rule, as explained on its talk page, you may be blocked if you revert more than once in a 24-hour period. Thank you, ] (]) 04:06, 21 July 2012 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 04:06, 21 July 2012
Your recent edits
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Misplaced Pages pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button 
or 
located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 00:14, 10 September 2011 (UTC)
Your recent edits
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Misplaced Pages pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 00:53, 17 September 2011 (UTC)
Your recent edits
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Misplaced Pages pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 15:50, 24 September 2011 (UTC)
Your recent edits
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Misplaced Pages pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 18:07, 29 September 2011 (UTC)
Your recent edits
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Misplaced Pages pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 13:29, 5 November 2011 (UTC)
Golan
Your edit was reverted because it directly contradicts what reliable sources say on the topic. Your re-revert was improper. You cannot simply try to force wanted changes into an article, see WP:EW. I dont intend on reporting this right now, but you should self-revert your last edit. nableezy - 22:23, 20 July 2012 (UTC)
- Do whatever you want. That does not change the fact that you are attempting to force into an article material against both the sources and past consensus. Neither of those things are acceptable. nableezy - 22:29, 20 July 2012 (UTC)
- Your question makes no sense to me. The edits I make are supported by the sources, and by past consensus. Your edit is neither supported by any source outside of MFA propaganda and has no past consensus supporting. nableezy - 22:32, 20 July 2012 (UTC)
That isnt a valid argument, sorry (and the idea that the United States government is pro-Arab and anti-Israel is far out there I cannot believe that I just read it). Misplaced Pages bases its articles on reliable sources. Not what you personally believe. If you continue to edit in such a manner, you likely will be prevented from doing so (ie being blocked). nableezy - 22:37, 20 July 2012 (UTC)
- All right, if thats how you feel. I'll be taking this to an administrative board shortly and will inform you when that is done. nableezy - 22:41, 20 July 2012 (UTC)
I dont want to "fight" with you either, Id like this settled easily. I cant change it back, editors are restricted from making more than one revert a day on an article. You should change it back and seek consensus on the talk page for your change. That is how things are done here. And before you get too involved editing articles, you should read several things. First, read the following content policies: WP:NPOV, WP:V, and WP:CON. Then read WP:CIV. Finally, be aware that the Arab-Israeli conflict topic area is subject to sanctions regime that allows administrators greater latitude in dealing with user conduct issues then in other topics. One of the sanctions in place is a 1 revert rule, meaning that no user may make more than one revert a day. If you want to solve this issue properly, self-revert your edit and seek a consensus on the talk page. Otherwise, this will have to be dealt with administratively. nableezy - 23:06, 20 July 2012 (UTC)
Edit warring at Golan Heights
File:YesThe Arbitration Committee has permitted administrators to impose discretionary sanctions (information on which is at Misplaced Pages:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions) on any editor who is active on pages broadly related to the Arab-Israeli conflict. Discretionary sanctions can be used against an editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Misplaced Pages, satisfy any standard of behavior, or follow any normal editorial process. If you continue to misconduct yourself on pages relating to this topic, you may be placed under sanctions, which can include blocks, a revert limitation, or an article ban. The Committee's full decision can be read at the "Final decision" section of the decision page.
Please familiarise yourself with the information page at Misplaced Pages:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions, with the appropriate sections of Misplaced Pages:Arbitration Committee/Procedures, and with the case decision page before making any further edits to the pages in question. This notice is given by an uninvolved administrator and will be logged on the case decision, pursuant to the conditions of the Arbitration Committee's discretionary sanctions system.
Golan Heights is an article where painful disputes have occurred in the past. If you continue to try to change the status of the Golan Heights without getting broad consensus for your changes, your actions may be reviewed by administrators. Since the article is under a WP:1RR rule, as explained on its talk page, you may be blocked if you revert more than once in a 24-hour period. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 04:06, 21 July 2012 (UTC)