Revision as of 14:16, 30 July 2012 edit70.118.102.247 (talk)No edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 14:18, 30 July 2012 edit undo70.118.102.247 (talk)No edit summaryNext edit → | ||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
] In a 2007 ], administrators were given the power to impose discretionary sanctions on any user editing ]-related articles in a disruptive way. If you continue with the behaviour on ], you may be placed under sanctions including blocks, a revert limitation or an article/topic ban. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-balkans2--> | ] In a 2007 ], administrators were given the power to impose discretionary sanctions on any user editing ]-related articles in a disruptive way. If you continue with the behaviour on ], you may be placed under sanctions including blocks, a revert limitation or an article/topic ban. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-balkans2--> | ||
Please don't , particularly on such egregiously controversial issues. --] (]) 08:19, 19 July 2012 (UTC) | |||
I see there's a pattern of abusive behavior - you also wrote to another user in an edit summary. ]. --] (]) 08:21, 19 July 2012 (UTC) | |||
] Thank you for ] to the encyclopedia! In case you are not already aware, an article to which you have recently contributed, ], is on ]. Also note that the terms of some article probations extend to related articles and their associated talk pages.<br><br>''The above is a ]. Please accept it as a routine friendly notice, not as a claim that there is any problem with your edits. Thank you.''<!-- Template:uw-probation --> ''']''' (] • ]) <small>] (etc) template appreciated.</small> 18:04, 19 July 2012 (UTC) | |||
<div class="user-block"> ] You have been ''']''' from editing for a period of '''24 hours''' for your ] caused by ] and violation of the ] at ]. During a dispute, you should first try to ] and seek ]. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek ], and in some cases it may be appropriate to request ]. If you would like to be unblocked, you may ] by adding the text <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx" argument. -->{{tlx|unblock|2=reason=''Your reason here ~~~~''}} below this notice, but you should read the ] first. ] (]) (]) 13:42, 30 July 2012 (UTC)</div>{{z10}}<!-- Template:uw-3block --> | <div class="user-block"> ] You have been ''']''' from editing for a period of '''24 hours''' for your ] caused by ] and violation of the ] at ]. During a dispute, you should first try to ] and seek ]. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek ], and in some cases it may be appropriate to request ]. If you would like to be unblocked, you may ] by adding the text <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx" argument. -->{{tlx|unblock|2=reason=''Your reason here ~~~~''}} below this notice, but you should read the ] first. ] (]) (]) 13:42, 30 July 2012 (UTC)</div>{{z10}}<!-- Template:uw-3block --> | ||
:''If this is a ], and you didn't make the edit, consider ] for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.''<!-- Template:Shared IP advice --> | :''If this is a ], and you didn't make the edit, consider ] for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.''<!-- Template:Shared IP advice --> | ||
== Notice of sanctions == | |||
Per ], I am hereby placing you on a one revert per article per week enforcement for the next 6 months for continued edit warring and ] behavior after being warned. If you violate that provision, you will be blocked. ] (]) (]) 13:46, 30 July 2012 (UTC) |
Revision as of 14:18, 30 July 2012
July 2012
In a 2007 arbitration case, administrators were given the power to impose discretionary sanctions on any user editing Balkans-related articles in a disruptive way. If you continue with the behaviour on Battle of Šibenik (1991), you may be placed under sanctions including blocks, a revert limitation or an article/topic ban. Thank you.
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for your disruption caused by edit warring and violation of the three-revert rule at Yugoslav Wars. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
below this notice, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 13:42, 30 July 2012 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.