Misplaced Pages

User talk:Hopiakuta: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 02:26, 31 July 2012 editFloquenbeam (talk | contribs)Administrators38,362 edits →Unblocked: missing word← Previous edit Revision as of 04:31, 31 July 2012 edit undoHopiakuta (talk | contribs)5,997 edits →UnblockedNext edit →
Line 327: Line 327:


I believe you should be able to edit now. If you cannot (sometimes the software has a glitch), please note that here. --] (]) 02:25, 31 July 2012 (UTC) I believe you should be able to edit now. If you cannot (sometimes the software has a glitch), please note that here. --] (]) 02:25, 31 July 2012 (UTC)

] zero: I have listed a couple hundred ] issues on this page; some are ]; ] is fraud: ] ] is more accurate.

¶ one: Thank You.

Somehow, I need to put ] into fifty ].

I do infer that he has not ever seen this copy of this page, ever, all year.

Please do commence a ] ] ] regarding all of this today, or this shall recur.

¶ two: Please do pair ] in ] &/or ] with the other terms.

I do dispute that. I do believe that everything that I have said this year has contributed. Maybe everything for six years.

¶ three: It shall recur.

Fact not in evidence.

¶ four: I just have.

] ''' Please ''' d] ] your ].''']]hank You''', '' ''' D'''on'''F'''phrnq'''T'''aub ''' P'''ersin]''. 04:31, 31 July 2012 (UTC)

Revision as of 04:31, 31 July 2012

  1. redirect user talk : hopiakuta/ index Samantha Geimer Lot Elizabeth Ann Smart Gilmour Deon Baptiste Ian Baptiste Emmett Louis Till Stanley Ann Dunham Anneke Frank Annele Frank Charles Augustus Lindbergh
This user interacts with Misplaced Pages using outdated equipment and at sometimes their output may appear strange. Please try to assume good faith, this user only wishes to help build the encyclopedia. If you have any questions or concerns, please see my talk. –xeno (talk) 03:04, 31 March 2009 (UTC) ... if Xeno is not around, please contact me. --Floquenbeam (talk) 02:17, 31 July 2012 (UTC)

hopiakuta Please do sign your communiqué .~~Thank You, DonFphrnqTaub Persina. 01:05, 15 May 2012 (UTC)

hopiakuta Please do sign your communiqué .~~Thank You, DonFphrnqTaub Persina. 01:05, 15 May 2012 (UTC)

hopiakuta Please do sign your communiqué .~~Thank You, DonFphrnqTaub Persina. 17:05, 27 May 2012 (UTC)

Alejandro Mayorkas

Please do explain how a .gov wikipedia : copyright_violations is possible.

  • Jump to: navigation, search

hopiakuta Please do sign your communiqué .~~Thank You, DonFphrnqTaub Persina. 17:00, 4 July 2012 (UTC)

hopiakuta Please do sign your communiqué .~~Thank You, DonFphrnqTaub Persina. 15:01, 10 July 2012 (UTC)

Discussion at the administrators' noticeboard

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. The issue seems to be your edit summaries, which are incomprehensible. Huon (talk) 10:49, 17 July 2012 (UTC)

July 2012 ; « A 2008 study found that Wikipedians were lower in agreeableness, openness, and conscientiousness than non-Misplaced Pages users. »

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for your apparent inability to communicate meaningfully with others, and for your otherwise problematic and/or incomprehensible contributions. See the AN discussion. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  Sandstein  13:48, 17 July 2012 (UTC)

Hopiakuta, I recognized your name in the discussion at WP:Administrators' noticeboard. I think I remember you have some significant accessibility issues, but I cannot recall the details. I'm not sure if there is anything I can do to help, but if you'd like me to try to help you resolve this, let me know. I am not very active, so it may take a while for me to reply. I will watch this page, you can reply here if you want to. --Floquenbeam (talk) 17:00, 23 July 2012 (UTC)

Thank You.

First, I do want to reference my first several edits, about Deon Baptiste & Ian Baptiste, which are currently linked in my signature, then, the pages @ user : persina, then, later, I would like to review what I have most recently been accused of.

Along the way, I would like to review several thousand incidents regarding Bernard Sanders, Stephen Tyrone Colbert, Stephen Tiberius Colbert, which might be a mock of Jim Tiberius Kirk, as well as Sam Longhorn Clemens versus Sam Langhorne Clemens, whether or not he had ever employed the pun longhorn is not verifiable, though he likely had, I am certain that he definitively had been a Langhorne, which should constitute undeniable. Alejandro Mayorkas, Fernando Gallego,..........

The list is infinite.

As much as I seek to be humorous about how I phrase such comments as user_talk:hopiakuta/Editnotice, the intent is solemn. Actually, much of what I do is a synthesis of humor & solemnity.

Everything that they say about my disability & symptoms is slander, libel; they have most of my biography backward.

I do reiterate that « hopiakuta » is a screenname, so that I need not typewrite « DonFphrnqTaub Persina » in order to login | logon.

hopiakuta Please do sign your communiqué .~~Thank You, DonFphrnqTaub Persina. 19:00, 23 July 2012 (UTC)

I note that wikipedia:miscellany_for_deletion/User:Riyas202 user:Riyas202 does remind me that I have also been targeted for uploading my photograph, never having attempted to add it to anything, as well as the wikinews incident. With all of this, we might be much better w/o wikimedia & Jim Wales. Despite the fact of several thousand excellent articles, what we have is a cyclopædia of libel & lie.

hopiakuta Please do sign your communiqué .~~Thank You, DonFphrnqTaub Persina. 20:10, 23 July 2012 (UTC)

What is the history for Bling_Crosby? I do not recall creating that; but, the history might include clues: userfy‽

hopiakuta Please do sign your communiqué .~~Thank You, DonFphrnqTaub Persina. 20:30, 23 July 2012 (UTC)

hopiakuta Please do sign your communiqué .~~Thank You, DonFphrnqTaub Persina. 20:40, 23 July 2012 (UTC)

  • A synthesis of humor and solemnity is an excellent way to live one's life. It may not be such a great way to edit Misplaced Pages, though. For example, my friend User:Proofreader77 was blocked indefinitely for mixing humor and solemnity too much. Misplaced Pages can be a pretty unwelcoming place for that particular combination.
First things first, though. You know you can be very difficult to understand, right? I think the majority of the people who recommended you be blocked did so more because of that, than because of any other reasons. I don't mean to pry or insult, but how much of this is by choice, and how much is due to your accessibility issues?
I get the impression that at least some of this is due to humor that is going over peoples' heads (including mine). Very few people on Misplaced Pages enjoy having to think hard in order to puzzle out other people's meaning. I'm practically a saint, and even I find it aggrevating at times.
As for Bling_Crosby, I don't know its history; it's been deleted and I'm not an administrator anymore, so I can't see it either. However, it was evidently created by another user, and doesn't seem to have anything to do with you. --Floquenbeam (talk) 14:08, 24 July 2012 (UTC)

Despite the fact that I had gotten the page moved, it remains okay to label two disabled Afrocaribbean men doppelgänger communist vandal sockpuppet. I continue to wish that I could warn them of that. Since that had been the basis of my original registration, I am obsessed by it.

I concede that you did not accuse me of anything similar; but, I do, hereby, point out that it is virtually impossible, though maybe not entirely, to create a title like wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_deletion/"Free_Roman_Polanski"_Petition inadvertently. If that had begun in mainspace & not userspace, then it would be rather difficult to justify, even by a bare thread.

Oddly, it has become a redirect: "Free_Roman_Polanski"_Petition: Roman_Polanski_sexual_abuse_case; Samantha_Geimer.

I have written a lot about how hiding her identity could be construed as a further insult. Regarding « Bling Crosby » or any other issue, I do seek, much as she had, to defend agaist libel.

I am not capable of reviewing his, proofread's, overall history; but, I can see by that one example that our histories do diverge dramatically. I am glad to learn of proofread; but, we are different. Also, I cannot figure what his name is; my name is all over my userspace.

« ...by choice, and how much is due to,... »‽ Physical disability, emotional disability & cognitive disability are difficult to detangle. I do perceive the distinction of nature versus nurture as, @ least partially, missing the point. I do perceive the distinction of capitalism versus socialism as, @ least partially, missing the point. Despite my disability, my left arm needs my right arm, as my right arm needs my left arm. My malfunctioning brain needs my heart & lungs, which, in turn, require a brain, even a bad one.


hopiakuta Please do sign your communiqué .~~Thank You, DonFphrnqTaub Persina. 17:00, 24 July 2012 (UTC)

hopiakuta Please do sign your communiqué .~~Thank You, DonFphrnqTaub Persina. 17:10, 24 July 2012 (UTC)

I did not coin this quote: « A 2008 study found that Wikipedians were lower in agreeableness, openness, and conscientiousness than non-Misplaced Pages users. »

hopiakuta Please do sign your communiqué .~~Thank You, DonFphrnqTaub Persina. 19:00, 24 July 2012 (UTC)

  • Yes, if you cannot change the things you cannot change, and choose not to change the things you can change, then nature vs nurture is missing the point. It really only mattered if you wanted to change the way you edit here to improve your chances of getting unblocked.
I don't really understand what you mean about Deon and Ian Baptiste (except I gather that they are the "disabled Afrocaribbean men"?)
Oh yes, you and Proofreader are definitely unique in your own unique ways. I didn't mean to imply differently.
I am not at all surprised by that 2008 study. --Floquenbeam (talk) 19:35, 24 July 2012 (UTC)

I do think that you had misunderstood that comment entirely:

Deon & Ian had been libeled on this website; that is why I had registered, primarily. It remains policy that this can recur, & that none of you had ever warned them & I do not know how to.

I had never had an account prior to having seen their photograph, & calling it to various persons' attention. As you can see in that early edit, I had not yet learned how to create a discussionpage: so, I simply placed the alert @ the bottom of the policy page &, I, also, had corrected some spelling in that edit.

I have shown the pages the only way that I can: user_:_hopiakuta/_edit_, user : persina.

I feel that there must be more pages like that one & one of you shall, eventually, in all likelihood, get someone assassinated in that fashion, someone who who has never written one character on any wikimedia website, someone who does not deserve it & does not want it.

I had argued against people who had sought to bury the name Sam Geimer.

You had asked « ...by choice, and how much is due to,... »; so, that entire paragraph had been about various metaphoric examples of how each are intertwined. Whatever you had said about that paragraph does not make sense to me.

Whatever you have just said, in the most recent comment before this one, does seem entirely incorrect compared to what I had said.

hopiakuta Please do sign your communiqué .~~Thank You, DonFphrnqTaub Persina. 20:20, 24 July 2012 (UTC)

  • After some research and detective work, I see now who Deon and Ian Baptiste are; I think you were correct in having that picture removed, but over-estimate the damage that was done.
Also, I don't think the name Samantha Geimer is "buried"; it redirects to Roman Polanski sexual abuse case, where she is prominently mentioned. If she also went by "Sam" Geimer, then a redirect at Sam Geimer makes sense; if she didn't go by that name, then a redirect isn't needed.
I thought I understood you re: nature vs. nurture, but I guess not. My point was, I hope you are unblocked, and when you are, I hope you will make as much of an effort as possible to be easier to understand, without losing your sense of humor. Or sense of solemnity. At the very least, please understand that many people, who are not evil or dumb, do have a difficult time understanding everything you're saying. --Floquenbeam (talk) 20:36, 25 July 2012 (UTC)

The dispute about Ms. Geimer had never been about any redirect; but, it had been regarding people who had, a few years ago, wanted to delete her name entirely, who did not even want it on a discussionpage.

Despite that, I have searched Sam, & most of the results do seem to indicate Polanski.

There are millions of ridiculous claims on this website, as well as on variations of the wiki domain name; just one is: « The last time that he was mentioned in a document is in 1507, but the date of his death is unknown. » This is chronologically impossible, physically impossible, illiteracy, alliteracy, aliteracy, not alliterate. This corporate personhood is preposterous, postposterous.


hopiakuta Please do sign your communiqué .~~Thank You, DonFphrnqTaub Persina. 00:00, 26 July 2012 (UTC)

  • Regarding Ms. Geimer: Oh, I see.
Regarding Mr. Gallego: I could change it to "the last time that he is mentioned in a document is in 2012", but I think what they are probably trying to say is "the last time he was refered to in a document which implied he was still alive was in 1507."
Regarding the other millions of ridiculous claims on this website: Yes, that's true, part and parcel of being an encyclopedia anyone can edit. Some of the claims are quite hippoposterous. It helps if you keep in mind that it's just a work in progress. Perfection is expected to be achieved sometime before the sun becomes a red giant. If errors really annoy you, stick to reading Featured Articles. Many of them are really quite excellent.--Floquenbeam (talk) 00:37, 26 July 2012 (UTC)



< http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=user_talk:hopiakuta/_laurel_barnstar_award_barnstar_laurel_inadvertently_deceptive_honorific_title,_of_positive_intent_;_I_prefer_an_actual_accomplishment_honor_of_disability-access-barrier-modification,_if_it_would_ever_occur&diff=315828871&oldid=315827509 >:

hopiakuta is sometimes misunderstood... he means well.
The Web Accessibility laurel
For your efforts over the years to make Misplaced Pages more welcoming to all people, I award you the Web Accessibility laurel. Here are some fine examples of your efforts -
further reading

I don't have as much time on Misplaced Pages as I used to, be please let me know if I can be of any assistance. –xeno 01:43, 24 September 2009 (UTC)



I am putting this here as an archive of what you had begun it with, in order that I might figure the meaning of it all:



hopiakuta is sometimes miunderstood... he means well.
The Web Accessibility laurel
For your efforts over the years to make Misplaced Pages more welcoming to all people, I award you the Accessibility barnstar. Here are fine examples of Hopiakuta's efforts -
further reading

I don't have as much time on Misplaced Pages as I used to, be please let me know if I can be of any assistance. –xeno 01:43, 24 September 2009 (UTC)


This is not directly related; I am simply adding this for separate various reasons, although national color is common:

hopiakuta Please do sign your communiqué .~~Thank You, DonFphrnqTaub Persina. 15:00, 28 July 2012 (UTC)

hopiakuta Please do sign your communiqué .~~Thank You, DonFphrnqTaub Persina. 19:00, 28 July 2012 (UTC)

hopiakuta Please do sign your communiqué .~~Thank You, DonFphrnqTaub Persina. 19:00, 29 July 2012 (UTC)

There are various problems with crime_in_Vatican_City, such as the superfluous wiktionary : superfluis « There has been speculation of a homosexual affair between Estermann and Tornay which ended in the killing. »

How can we adjudicate whether a corpse is bisexual, homosexual, heterosexual‽ Since they are dead, it cannot be verified.

Editing is needed for articles like Kingdom_of_Redonda, Redonda. Victoria_of_the_United_Kingdom‽ She would have had someone write it on paper. Redondo.

I have now learned judaizing, judaize, & uxoricide, mariticide.

hopiakuta Please do sign your communiqué .~~Thank You, DonFphrnqTaub Persina. 03:00, 30 July 2012 (UTC)

There are many ridiculous claims, which are therefore difficult to respond to, especially if received in firehose fashion. It is policy to assume fact not_in_evidence as well as bad_faith_(disambiguation) which would be accurate regarding ignosticism & agnosticism; however: I had attempted a website, which failed, & someone had uploaded a virus_(disambiguation), crash_(disambiguation) crashed it. It is blame_the_victim, victim_ blame, which is a contributory_factor toward being an ignostic, agnostic, as well as causation toward a social_model_of_disability.

hopiakuta Please do sign your communiqué .~~Thank You, DonFphrnqTaub Persina. 11:00, 30 July 2012 (UTC)

Unblocked

I've unblocked your account Hopiakuta (or do you prefer to be called Persina, or DonFphrnqTaub Persina?). There was no consenus to keep the block, and no consensus to overturn it, and I believe where there is no consensus either way, the default should be to unblock. I've added my name to the box that User:Xeno put on top of your page, and will keep an eye on this talk page. However, I will not be watching every edit, so if there is a question or comment directed at me, please edit my talk page: User talk:Floquenbeam.

To be honest, I too am confused about this edit you made: , which apparently started the whole mess. We generally do not add a "see also" for non-existent articles, nor articles that sound similar to the article name. The "see also" section is for articles on a related subject, not homophones or partial-homophones.

I'm hopeful that you won't have any similar issues in the future. Please remember that people have a hard time understanding you sometimes, and make allowances for that in your responses to them. They are neither evil nor stupid because they can't clearly understand where you're coming from.

I believe you should be able to edit now. If you cannot (sometimes the software has a glitch), please note that here. --Floquenbeam (talk) 02:25, 31 July 2012 (UTC)

zero: I have listed a couple hundred relevant issues on this page; some are explicit; be_bold is fraud: fascist truthy is more accurate.

¶ one: Thank You.

Somehow, I need to put user_talk:hopiakuta/Editnotice into fifty pica.

I do infer that he has not ever seen this copy of this page, ever, all year.

Please do commence a disability access project disability access project regarding all of this today, or this shall recur.

¶ two: Please do pair stericycle in yahoo! &/or google with the other terms.

I do dispute that. I do believe that everything that I have said this year has contributed. Maybe everything for six years.

¶ three: It shall recur.

Fact not in evidence.

¶ four: I just have.

hopiakuta Please do sign your communiqué .~~Thank You, DonFphrnqTaub Persina. 04:31, 31 July 2012 (UTC)