Misplaced Pages

talk:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Fæ/Evidence: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages talk:Arbitration | Requests | Case | Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 23:21, 29 May 2012 view sourceRich Farmbrough (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, File movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers, Template editors1,725,741 edits What a shame← Previous edit Latest revision as of 18:35, 9 August 2012 view source Courcelles (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Autopatrolled, Administrators434,776 edits {{pp-protected|small=yes}} 
(310 intermediate revisions by 40 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{pp-semi-protected|small=yes}} {{pp-protected|small=yes}}
{{Casenav}} {{NOINDEX}}
{{ombox |image=none |text= This page has been ]. {{#ifeq:yes|yes|The ]'s decision is still in effect, and can be viewed at ]. The contents of the page can be viewed in the .|}}
{{Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Fæ/Notice}}
}}

==What a shame==
To see that so many apparently desire nothing more than to attack others. I encourage all contributors to re-evaluate their text and try to make them as positive as possible, placing them in context where appropriate. '']&nbsp;]'', <small>23:21, 29 May 2012 (UTC).</small><br />

Latest revision as of 18:35, 9 August 2012

This page has been blanked as a courtesy. The Arbitration Committee's decision is still in effect, and can be viewed at the main case page. The contents of the page can be viewed in the history.