| Revision as of 14:05, 30 May 2012 view sourceSirFozzie (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users11,150 edits →Scope of proceeding← Previous edit |
Latest revision as of 18:35, 9 August 2012 view source Courcelles (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Autopatrolled, Administrators434,776 edits {{pp-protected|small=yes}} |
| (303 intermediate revisions by 39 users not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
|
{{pp-semi-protected|small=yes}} |
|
{{pp-protected|small=yes}} |
|
{{Casenav}} |
|
{{NOINDEX}} |
|
|
{{ombox |image=none |text= This page has been ]. {{#ifeq:yes|yes|The ]'s decision is still in effect, and can be viewed at ]. The contents of the page can be viewed in the .|}} |
|
{{Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Fæ/Notice}} |
|
|
|
}} |
|
|
|
|
==What a shame== |
|
|
To see that so many apparently desire nothing more than to attack others. I encourage all contributors to re-evaluate their text and try to make them as positive as possible, placing them in context where appropriate. ''] ]'', <small>23:21, 29 May 2012 (UTC).</small><br /> |
|
|
:What do you think "attacks others" without providing a diff in context? -- ] (]) 23:23, 29 May 2012 (UTC) |
|
|
:Yes, if attacking is happening, can you please specify instances so the clerks can remove it? --] (]) 01:51, 30 May 2012 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
:Per "Uncivil comments or accusations that are not backed up with explicit diffs will be removed on sight" in that fat orange box above, Farmbrough's comment should be reverted by a Clerk. ] (]) 03:25, 30 May 2012 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
::Agree. This thread can go until the comment has diffs. --] (]) 04:03, 30 May 2012 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== Scope of proceeding == |
|
|
|
|
|
The scope of this proceeding is unclear. Is ArbCom evaluating whether to sanction anyone other than Fae or MBisanz? For example, the evidence I would be most interested in would concern the actions of those not parties to the case. It is difficult for me to submit evidence defending Fae ''per se'', because I don't perceive him to have been accused of any significant wrongdoing. ] (]) 13:29, 30 May 2012 (UTC) |
|
|
:IF you have evidence on other users not parties, submit that evidence (per the rules of this case, strictly with diff-backup) and then request to a clerk or to me here to add a party to the case. ] (]) 14:05, 30 May 2012 (UTC) |
|