| Revision as of 22:23, 10 August 2012 editMoxy (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Page movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers, Template editors130,043 edits →WP:3RR: ce← Previous edit | Revision as of 22:35, 10 August 2012 edit undoBretonbanquet (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers75,607 edits →AC/DC: furtherNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| ==AC/DC== | ==AC/DC== | ||
| The piece you're adding has nothing to do with the band. The source you posted doesn't mention the band, and AC/DC can mean a number of things, not just the band. Unless it has a direct, and notable, relevance to the band, it doesn't go in the article. I'll be taking it out again shortly - do not put it back. ] (]) 21:36, 10 August 2012 (UTC) | The piece you're adding has nothing to do with the band. The source you posted doesn't mention the band, and AC/DC can mean a number of things, not just the band. Unless it has a direct, and notable, relevance to the band, it doesn't go in the article. I'll be taking it out again shortly - do not put it back. ] (]) 21:36, 10 August 2012 (UTC) | ||
| :If this thing is relevant on Misplaced Pages, it might be relevant in a different article that actually covers this kind of trojan thing. Even if the name was inspired by the band's name, it's still ] at best. Nobody reading that segment will understand it without lengthy explanation anyway, and it's just not the place for it. And as Moxy has pointed out, if you just keep adding it, you'll be blocked. ] (]) 22:35, 10 August 2012 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | == ] == | ||
Revision as of 22:35, 10 August 2012
AC/DC
The piece you're adding has nothing to do with the band. The source you posted doesn't mention the band, and AC/DC can mean a number of things, not just the band. Unless it has a direct, and notable, relevance to the band, it doesn't go in the article. I'll be taking it out again shortly - do not put it back. Bretonbanquet (talk) 21:36, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
- If this thing is relevant on Misplaced Pages, it might be relevant in a different article that actually covers this kind of trojan thing. Even if the name was inspired by the band's name, it's still WP:TRIVIA at best. Nobody reading that segment will understand it without lengthy explanation anyway, and it's just not the place for it. And as Moxy has pointed out, if you just keep adding it, you'll be blocked. Bretonbanquet (talk) 22:35, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
WP:3RR
Pls read WP:3RR - Editors who engage in edit warring are liable to be blocked from editing to prevent further disruption. While any edit warring may lead to sanctions, there is a bright-line rule called the three-revert rule (3RR), the violation of which often leads to a block. The three-revert rule states:
An editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing other editors—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Violations of the rule normally attract blocks of at least 24 hours. Any appearance of gaming the system by reverting a fourth time just outside the 24-hour slot is likely to be treated as a 3RR violation. See below for exemptions.