Misplaced Pages

User talk:Jojhutton: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from[REDACTED] with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 17:35, 12 August 2012 editJojhutton (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers48,497 editsm Reverted 1 edit by Galestar (talk) identified as vandalism to last revision by EdwardsBot. (TW)← Previous edit Revision as of 23:40, 12 August 2012 edit undoGalestar (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users741 edits →Edits on Conservapedia: new sectionNext edit →
Line 129: Line 129:
</div> </div>
<!-- EdwardsBot 0319 --> <!-- EdwardsBot 0319 -->

== Edits on Conservapedia ==

] Your recent editing history at ] shows that you are currently engaged in an ]. '''Being involved in an edit war can result in you being ]'''&mdash;especially if you violate the ], which states that an editor must not perform more than three ] on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;'''even if you don't violate the three-revert rule'''&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's ] to work toward making a version that represents ] among editors. See ] for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant ] or seek ]. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary ]. <!-- Template:uw-3rr --> ] (]) 20:22, 12 August 2012 (UTC)

Revision as of 23:40, 12 August 2012


If you leave me a message here, I will answer here

This page is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.
This editor is a Senior Editor and is entitled to display this Rhodium Editor Star.
30,000+This user has made more than 30,000 contributions to Misplaced Pages.
This user contributes using an
iMac.
This user contributes using an
iPad.
[REDACTED] This user is one of the 2000 most active English Wikipedians of all time.
This user is a new page patroller.
This user has been on Misplaced Pages for 16 years, 10 months and 2 days.
This user has rollback rights on the English Misplaced Pages. (verify)
On Ye June 2010, in the year of the 'pedia Jojhutton came 2502 on this measure of editcountitis.
This user is interested in the
History of the
United States of America.
[REDACTED] This user is a participant in
WikiProject Baseball.

Life is grand

This editor is a
Senior Editor
and is entitled to display this Rhodium
Editor Star.


List of American television programs by date

Archiving icon
Archives

What has come before 1 2 3 4 5 6


This page has archives. Sections may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III.

Re: Question on Harry Potter Cast List

Hello, Jojhutton. You have new messages at Lord Opeth's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

The Bugle: Issue LXXVI, July 2012

Full front page of The Bugle Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Ed  09:28, 29 July 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 30 July 2012

WP:WikiProject Council/Proposals/Cheers and Frasier task forces

I have proposed a task force of two shows; join in discussion. --George Ho (talk) 16:43, 2 August 2012 (UTC)

Chick-Fil-A

 Hello Jojhutton, Lionelt has given you a delicious Chick-Fil-A sammie, for reverting the deletion of Chick-fil-A Appreciation Day and righting an epic injustice! You see, these things promote WikiLove and hopefully this has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a delicious Chick-Fil-A sammie! Enjoy!

I see that you are interested in Reagan. Perhaps you might be interested in !voting here. – Lionel 01:15, 3 August 2012 (UTC)

  • Although I appreciate the support, I'm officially uninvolved in the overall debate. My only concern in this regard, is that deletion discussions are not closed after 20 minutes by an involved admin, with the statement that "it was going to be a snow delete anyway"JOJ 01:20, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
    • No. Xe said snow vote. This is quite correct. It would have been. You seem to be confused about the difference between redirection and deletion. No deletion occurred in this instance, as can be easily seen from the page logs. When, as here, a person does a merger and then nominates the merge source article for deletion, which is an error because deletion and AFD are no part of the merger process, we do often rapidly eject that from AFD as an incorrect application of the merger process. Uncle G (talk) 10:13, 3 August 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 06 August 2012

Edits on Conservapedia

Your recent editing history at Conservapedia shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Dmcq (talk) 20:22, 12 August 2012 (UTC)

Category:
User talk:Jojhutton: Difference between revisions Add topic