Misplaced Pages

User talk:Statesman1: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 17:11, 17 January 2012 editShrike (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Page movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers14,544 editsm Added welcome template to user talk page (TW)← Previous edit Revision as of 11:09, 19 August 2012 edit undoCIreland (talk | contribs)Administrators19,686 edits →Edit-warring: new sectionNext edit →
Line 14: Line 14:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a ]! Please ] your messages on ]s using four ]s (<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out ], ask me on ], or ask your question on this page and then place <code><nowiki>{{help me}}</nowiki></code> before the question. Again, welcome! <!-- Template:Welcome --> I hope you enjoy editing here and being a ]! Please ] your messages on ]s using four ]s (<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out ], ask me on ], or ask your question on this page and then place <code><nowiki>{{help me}}</nowiki></code> before the question. Again, welcome! <!-- Template:Welcome -->
] (]) 17:11, 17 January 2012 (UTC) ] (]) 17:11, 17 January 2012 (UTC)

== Edit-warring ==

Hello Statesman1. I noticed the edit-war at {{la|Six-Day War}}. This is a topic which falls within the scope of a past arbitration case, ] and so is one where edit-warring is typically dealt with more harshly; there is a formal notification message that explains this and I will leave such a message below. If it happens that you feel the need to revert again at Six-Day War, please consider pursuing ]. ] (]) 11:09, 19 August 2012 (UTC)

The notification template I mentioned follows:

{{Ivmbox
| image = yes
| The ] has permitted ] to impose discretionary sanctions (information on which is at ]) on any editor who is active on pages broadly related to the ]. Discretionary sanctions can be used against an editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the ], satisfy any ], or follow any ]. If you continue to misconduct yourself on pages relating to this topic, you may be placed under sanctions, which can include blocks, a revert limitation, or an article ban. The Committee's full decision can be read at the "]" section of the decision page.

Please familiarise yourself with the information page at ], with the appropriate sections of ], and with the case decision page before making any further edits to the pages in question. This notice is given by an uninvolved administrator and&nbsp;will be logged on the case decision, pursuant to the conditions of the Arbitration Committee's discretionary sanctions system.<!-- Template:uw-sanctions - {{{topic|{{{t}}}}}} -->
| valign = center
| ]
}}

Revision as of 11:09, 19 August 2012

September 2009

Your recent addition to United Nations Security Council Resolution 242 has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Misplaced Pages without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. Misplaced Pages takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. nableezy - 15:20, 3 September 2009 (UTC)

Instead of continually reverting, could you please make your case on the talk page? nableezy - 16:19, 25 September 2009 (UTC)

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Statesman1, and welcome to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Misplaced Pages:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Shrike (talk) 17:11, 17 January 2012 (UTC)

Edit-warring

Hello Statesman1. I noticed the edit-war at Six-Day War (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views). This is a topic which falls within the scope of a past arbitration case, Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration/Palestine-Israel articles and so is one where edit-warring is typically dealt with more harshly; there is a formal notification message that explains this and I will leave such a message below. If it happens that you feel the need to revert again at Six-Day War, please consider pursuing dispute resolution instead. CIreland (talk) 11:09, 19 August 2012 (UTC)

The notification template I mentioned follows:

File:Yes 
The Arbitration Committee has permitted administrators to impose discretionary sanctions (information on which is at Misplaced Pages:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions) on any editor who is active on pages broadly related to the Arab-Israeli conflict. Discretionary sanctions can be used against an editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Misplaced Pages, satisfy any standard of behavior, or follow any normal editorial process. If you continue to misconduct yourself on pages relating to this topic, you may be placed under sanctions, which can include blocks, a revert limitation, or an article ban. The Committee's full decision can be read at the "Final decision" section of the decision page.

Please familiarise yourself with the information page at Misplaced Pages:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions, with the appropriate sections of Misplaced Pages:Arbitration Committee/Procedures, and with the case decision page before making any further edits to the pages in question. This notice is given by an uninvolved administrator and will be logged on the case decision, pursuant to the conditions of the Arbitration Committee's discretionary sanctions system.