Revision as of 22:59, 16 May 2012 edit66.26.95.207 (talk)No edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 06:30, 29 August 2012 edit undoFuture Perfect at Sunrise (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Administrators87,200 edits →Dutch IPA: new sectionNext edit → | ||
Line 78: | Line 78: | ||
The word "''animalcules''" in the introduction should be turned into a link: ]. ] (]) 14:41, 12 April 2012 (UTC) | The word "''animalcules''" in the introduction should be turned into a link: ]. ] (]) 14:41, 12 April 2012 (UTC) | ||
== Dutch IPA == | |||
I have reinstated the changes to the Dutch IPA information made by {{ipuser|89.79.88.109 }} (), changing "{{IPA|ˈleːʋənˌhuːk}}" to "{{IPA|ˈleːʋə(n)ˌɦuk}}". All three contested changes, regarding (1) the optionality of the , (2) the absence of length on the , and (3) the use of rather than , are consistent with our page on ], with our (well-sourced) article on ], and with the chapter on Dutch in the ''Handbook of the International Phonetic Association''. ] ] 06:30, 29 August 2012 (UTC) |
Revision as of 06:30, 29 August 2012
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Antonie van Leeuwenhoek article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
|
Find medical sources: Source guidelines · PubMed · Cochrane · DOAJ · Gale · OpenMD · ScienceDirect · Springer · Trip · Wiley · TWL |
Archives: 1 |
Antonie van Leeuwenhoek was a good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | ||||||||||
|
This article has not yet been rated on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
{{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
{{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
{{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
{{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
{{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Am I missing something, or is this supposed to be of importance?
"In 1687 he reported his research on the coffee bean. He roasted the bean, cut it into slices and saw a spongeous interior. The bean was pressed, and an oil appeared. He boiled the coffee with rain water twice, set it aside (and probably drank it slowly)." 66.26.95.207 (talk) 22:59, 16 May 2012 (UTC)
Life
Deleted my information, because of Clammage, what could be his profession? To me he seems lazy. Taksen (talk) 21:03, 13 August 2009
This article should be closed, because of vandalism, almost everyday. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek seems to be a very popular lemma to leave nonsense.Taksen (talk) 05:40, 17 September 2009 (UTC)
Semi-protected
I have semi-protected this article due to vandalism by unlogged in users. If any person wishes to make a valid edit to the article and is unable to, please get in touch with me. SilkTork * 07:01, 19 September 2009 (UTC)
- The part that says he is "probably at least acquainted" with the famous painter is followed by proof that he was executor of the painters will. I think that section should be cleaned up, it is kinda obvious he was "at least acquainted" 74.75.152.246 (talk) 14:44, 24 March 2012 (UTC)
Name
The Man's name was Anton van Leeuwenhoek not Antonie van Leeuwenhoek sithlo (talk) 23:11, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
- I am a 50-year-old engineer. Anton is the name I know too.
- If I had a copy of Asimov's Biographical Encyclopedia of Science and Technology here, I would consult it. I read it cover to cover in high school, and obviously found it useful. Varlaam (talk) 04:08, 12 August 2011 (UTC)
Pronunciation
Guys, please, give pronunciation in the Dutch language. Thanks.--Rosswood40 (talk) 23:15, 20 December 2009 (UTC)
Philips
Does anybody know where the names Philips came from? I could not found a source that this was his name and not just his father's name. עדירל (talk) 13:29, 6 September 2010 (UTC)
English pronunciation
Is Layvenhook really the routine English pronunciation? I doubt I have heard that in 40 years, but then I did not specialize in microscopy.
I personally suspect that science teachers have liked saying Loowenhook. They were simply in the dark on this point?
Varlaam (talk) 04:16, 12 August 2011 (UTC)
Adding "van"
It is commonly said that — unlike in German, where "von" implies a nobleman — "van" in Dutch has no special implication.
Beethoven used "van" as he was in Germany, and Germans took his "van" as a "von".
So why does Leeuwenhoek feel the need to be van Leeuwenhoek?
Varlaam (talk) 04:34, 12 August 2011 (UTC)
- He may not have "felt the need". For most Dutchmen, the "van" was literal. It's Dutch for "from", and if he (or an ancestor) came from a locality named "Leeuwenhoek", then the family would be "from Leeuwenhoek". This sort of surname can derive from a city, district, neighborhood, physical feature, or any other sort of landmark. The "van" in Dutch names is not about nobility; it's about family history and Dutch grammar. --EncycloPetey (talk) 04:04, 1 March 2012 (UTC)
How did he make his lenses?
One part of the article mentions that he made his lenses from tiny beads of melted glass rather than grinding them. Later on the article states that he ground several hundred lenses. Which is correct? Dposte46 (talk) 09:28, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
his best friends name was jade — Preceding unsigned comment added by 163.6.1.187 (talk) 16:42, 28 February 2012 (UTC)
Link
The word "animalcules" in the introduction should be turned into a link: animalcules. 31.18.253.188 (talk) 14:41, 12 April 2012 (UTC)
Dutch IPA
I have reinstated the changes to the Dutch IPA information made by 89.79.88.109 (talk · contribs · WHOIS) (), changing "ˈleːʋənˌhuːk" to "ˈleːʋə(n)ˌɦuk". All three contested changes, regarding (1) the optionality of the , (2) the absence of length on the , and (3) the use of rather than , are consistent with our page on Misplaced Pages:IPA for Dutch and Afrikaans, with our (well-sourced) article on Dutch phonology, and with the chapter on Dutch in the Handbook of the International Phonetic Association. Fut.Perf. ☼ 06:30, 29 August 2012 (UTC)
Categories:- Former good article nominees
- All unassessed articles
- B-Class Microbiology articles
- Top-importance Microbiology articles
- WikiProject Microbiology articles
- B-Class biography articles
- B-Class biography (science and academia) articles
- Mid-importance biography (science and academia) articles
- Science and academia work group articles
- WikiProject Biography articles
- B-Class Netherlands articles
- All WikiProject Netherlands pages
- B-Class history of science articles
- Mid-importance history of science articles
- WikiProject History of Science articles
- B-Class physics articles
- Mid-importance physics articles
- B-Class physics articles of Mid-importance
- B-Class physics biographies articles
- Physics biographies articles
- B-Class physics history articles
- Physics history articles
- B-Class medicine articles
- High-importance medicine articles
- All WikiProject Medicine pages