Misplaced Pages

Hillsborough Independent Panel: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 21:50, 13 September 2012 editDePiep (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users294,285 edits Members: 9← Previous edit Revision as of 22:23, 13 September 2012 edit undoDePiep (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users294,285 edits bascics (from H. disaster page)Next edit →
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Db-a10|article=Hillsborough disaster#Hillsborough Independent Panel report}} {{Db-a10|article=Hillsborough disaster#Hillsborough Independent Panel report}}
{{merge|Hillsborough disaster|date=September 2012}} {{merge|Hillsborough disaster|date=September 2012}}



{{details|Hillsborough disaster#Hillsborough Independent Panel report}} {{details|Hillsborough disaster#Hillsborough Independent Panel report}}
Line 19: Line 18:
* Peter Sissons * Peter Sissons
* Sarah Tyacke, CBE * Sarah Tyacke, CBE

==The Hillsborough Independent Panel report==
In the years following the disaster there was a growing feeling that the full facts behind the disaster were not in the public domain, with a suspicion that some facts were deliberately covered up.
The Hillsborough Family Support Group, led by Trevor Hicks, had long campaigned for the release of all relevant documents. Following the 20th anniversary of the disaster in April 2009, supported by the then ] ] and ] ],
the government asked the ] and ] to investigate the best way for this information to be made public.<ref name="Hansard1209"/>
In December 2009, ] ] announced the formation of the Hillsborough Independent Panel with a remit to oversee "full public disclosure of relevant government and local information within the limited constraints set out in the disclosure protocol" and "consult with the Hillsborough families to ensure that the views of those most affected by the tragedy are taken into account"<ref name="Hansard1209">{{cite web|url=http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200910/cmhansrd/cm091215/wmstext/91215m0004.htm|title=Parliamentary business|publisher=Parliament.uk|date=15 December 2009}}</ref>. An archive of all the relevant documentation would be created and a report produced within two years explaining the work of the panel and its conclusions. The panel would be chaired by ], the ].
Other panel members were ], a human rights lawyer. Christine Gifford, an expert in the field of access to information; Katy Jones, an investigative journalist; Dr Bill Kirkup, Associate Chief Medical Officer in the Department of Health; Paul Leighton, former Deputy Chief Constable of the ]; Professor Phil Scraton, an expert in criminology and ], broadcaster.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.liverpoolecho.co.uk/liverpool-news/local-news//tm_headline=who-are-the-members-of-the-hillsborough-independent-panel%26method=full%26objectid=31815017%26siteid=100252-name_page.html|title=Who are the members of the Hillsborough Independent Panel?|publisher=Liverpool Echo|date=12 September 2012}}</ref>

One particular point of contention was that in the original inquest, the Coroner Dr Stefan Popper had limited evidence to a cut off time of 3.15 pm, this meant that the subsequent response of the police and emergency services was not properly investigated.<ref name="Guardian240409">{{cite web|url=http://www.guardian.co.uk/football/2009/apr/24/hillsborough-families-urge-truth-commission?INTCMP=SRCH|title=Hillsborough families will call for 'truth commission' at meeting with minister|publisher=Fuardian.co.uk|date=24 Apr 2009}}</ref>

==Findings==
On 12 September 2012, the Hillsborough Independent Panel<ref> Hillsborough Independent Report</ref> reached a conclusion that no Liverpool fans were responsible in any way for the disaster, and that the main cause of the disaster was a "lack of police control". Subsequent apologies were released by Prime Minister ] on behalf of the government,<ref>{{Cite web | url = http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-merseyside-19543964 | title = Hillsborough papers: Cameron apology over "double injustice" | date = 12 September 2012 | accessdate =12 September 2012 | publisher = BBC News}}</ref> ] on behalf of the opposition,<ref>{{cite web|title=Hillsborough statement: Cameron and Miliband apologise|url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/democracylive/hi/house_of_commons/newsid_9750000/9750850.stm|publisher=BBC Democracy Live|accessdate=12 September 2012|date=12 September 2012}}</ref> Sheffield Wednesday Football Club, South Yorkshire Police, and former editor of ''The Sun'', Kelvin McKenzie, who apologised for writing the headline "The Truth".<ref name=mckenzie>{{Cite web | url = http://www.itv.com/news/update/2012-09-12/kelvin-mckenzie-offers-profuse-apologies-over-hillsborough/ | title = Kelvin MacKenzie offers "profuse apologies" over Hillsborough | publisher = ] | date = 12 September 2012 | accessdate =12 September 2012}}</ref> McKenzie said he should have instead written headline that read "The Lies", although this apology was widely discredited by the Hillsborough Family Support Group and Liverpool fans all over the country, as it was seen to be "shifting the blame once again."<ref name=mckenzie/>

Amongst the main findings in the Report, it was concluded that the safety of the crowd was "compromised at every level" and overcrowding issues had been recorded two years earlier. The report concludes that ], ] passed on inaccurate and untrue information from the police to the press.<ref> The Scotsman</ref><ref><i>Hillsborough: The Report of the Hillsborough Independent Panel</i>, pages 350-352.</ref> The Panel concluded that "up to 41" of the ninety-six who perished may have survived had the emergency services' reactions and co-ordination been improved.<ref> The Guardian</ref>

The panel found that South Yorkshire Police and other emergency services had made a "strenuous attempt" to deflect the blame for the tragedy from them and onto the Liverpool supporters. 164 witness statements were amended, 116 of them removing statements which were unfavourable to South Yorkshire Police. In addition police carried out blood alcohol readings of the victims, some of them children, and ran computer check on the ] in an attempt to "impugn their reputation".<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.guardian.co.uk/football/2012/sep/12/hillsborough-disaster-report-panel-released-live|title=Hillsborough disaster report published - Wednesday 12 September|publisher=Guardian.co.uk|date=12 Sep 2012}}</ref>

Labour MP for the ] in Greater Manchester ], a former Secretary of State for Health, who had led the campaign for a full inquiry, promising to find results in 2011,<ref> Daily Mirror</ref> thanked the Prime Minister "for every single word" of his statement to the Commons.<ref> BBC News</ref>


==Resources== ==Resources==

Revision as of 22:23, 13 September 2012

This redirect may meet Misplaced Pages's criteria for speedy deletion as a recently created article with no relevant page history that does not expand upon, detail, or improve information within the existing article(s) on the subject, Hillsborough disaster#Hillsborough Independent Panel report (compare pages). Note that splits of large articles are not eligible under this criterion. If the title of the page is a plausible redirect to an existing page, it is not eligible for speedy deletion, and should be redirected instead. See CSD A10.%5B%5BWP%3ACSD%23A10%7CA10%5D%5D%3A+Recently+created+article+that+duplicates+an+existing+topic%2C+%5B%5B%3AHillsborough+disaster%23Hillsborough+Independent+Panel+report%5D%5DA10

If this redirect does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, or you intend to fix it, please remove this notice, but do not remove this notice from pages that you have created yourself. If you created this page and you disagree with the given reason for deletion, you can click the button below and leave a message explaining why you believe it should not be deleted. You can also visit the talk page to check if you have received a response to your message.

Note that this redirect may be deleted at any time if it unquestionably meets the speedy deletion criteria, or if an explanation posted to the talk page is found to be insufficient.

Nominator: Please consider placing the template:
{{subst:db-a10-notice|Hillsborough Independent Panel|header=1|article=Hillsborough disaster#Hillsborough Independent Panel report}} ~~~~
on the talk page of the author.

Note to administrators: this redirect has content on its talk page which should be checked before deletion.

Administrators: check links, talk, history (last), and logs before deletion. Consider checking Google.
This page was last edited by DePiep (contribs | logs) at 22:23, 13 September 2012 (UTC) (12 years ago)
It has been suggested that this article be merged with Hillsborough disaster. (Discuss) Proposed since September 2012.
Further information: Hillsborough disaster § Hillsborough Independent Panel report

The Hillsborough Independent Panel is a panel installed by the British government to research the Hillsborough disaster (1989).

On 11 September 2012, they publushed their report .

Members

  • James Jones, bishop of Liverpool
  • Raju Bhatt
  • Christine Gifford
  • Katy Jones
  • Dr Bill Kirkup, CBE
  • Paul Leighton, CBE QPM
  • Professor Phil Scraton
  • Peter Sissons
  • Sarah Tyacke, CBE

The Hillsborough Independent Panel report

In the years following the disaster there was a growing feeling that the full facts behind the disaster were not in the public domain, with a suspicion that some facts were deliberately covered up. The Hillsborough Family Support Group, led by Trevor Hicks, had long campaigned for the release of all relevant documents. Following the 20th anniversary of the disaster in April 2009, supported by the then Culture secretary Andy Burnham and Minister of State for Justice Maria Eagle, the government asked the Home Office and Department of Culture, Media and Sport to investigate the best way for this information to be made public.

In December 2009, Home Secretary Alan Johnson announced the formation of the Hillsborough Independent Panel with a remit to oversee "full public disclosure of relevant government and local information within the limited constraints set out in the disclosure protocol" and "consult with the Hillsborough families to ensure that the views of those most affected by the tragedy are taken into account". An archive of all the relevant documentation would be created and a report produced within two years explaining the work of the panel and its conclusions. The panel would be chaired by James Jones, the Bishop of Liverpool. Other panel members were Raju Bhatt, a human rights lawyer. Christine Gifford, an expert in the field of access to information; Katy Jones, an investigative journalist; Dr Bill Kirkup, Associate Chief Medical Officer in the Department of Health; Paul Leighton, former Deputy Chief Constable of the Police Service of Northern Ireland; Professor Phil Scraton, an expert in criminology and Peter Sissons, broadcaster.

One particular point of contention was that in the original inquest, the Coroner Dr Stefan Popper had limited evidence to a cut off time of 3.15 pm, this meant that the subsequent response of the police and emergency services was not properly investigated.

Findings

On 12 September 2012, the Hillsborough Independent Panel reached a conclusion that no Liverpool fans were responsible in any way for the disaster, and that the main cause of the disaster was a "lack of police control". Subsequent apologies were released by Prime Minister David Cameron on behalf of the government, Ed Miliband on behalf of the opposition, Sheffield Wednesday Football Club, South Yorkshire Police, and former editor of The Sun, Kelvin McKenzie, who apologised for writing the headline "The Truth". McKenzie said he should have instead written headline that read "The Lies", although this apology was widely discredited by the Hillsborough Family Support Group and Liverpool fans all over the country, as it was seen to be "shifting the blame once again."

Amongst the main findings in the Report, it was concluded that the safety of the crowd was "compromised at every level" and overcrowding issues had been recorded two years earlier. The report concludes that the then Conservative MP for Sheffield Hallam, Irvine Patnick passed on inaccurate and untrue information from the police to the press. The Panel concluded that "up to 41" of the ninety-six who perished may have survived had the emergency services' reactions and co-ordination been improved.

The panel found that South Yorkshire Police and other emergency services had made a "strenuous attempt" to deflect the blame for the tragedy from them and onto the Liverpool supporters. 164 witness statements were amended, 116 of them removing statements which were unfavourable to South Yorkshire Police. In addition police carried out blood alcohol readings of the victims, some of them children, and ran computer check on the national police database in an attempt to "impugn their reputation".

Labour MP for the Leigh constituency in Greater Manchester Andy Burnham, a former Secretary of State for Health, who had led the campaign for a full inquiry, promising to find results in 2011, thanked the Prime Minister "for every single word" of his statement to the Commons.

Resources

  1. ^ "Parliamentary business". Parliament.uk. 15 December 2009.
  2. "Who are the members of the Hillsborough Independent Panel?". Liverpool Echo. 12 September 2012.
  3. "Hillsborough families will call for 'truth commission' at meeting with minister". Fuardian.co.uk. 24 Apr 2009.
  4. Home Page Hillsborough Independent Report
  5. "Hillsborough papers: Cameron apology over "double injustice"". BBC News. 12 September 2012. Retrieved 12 September 2012.
  6. "Hillsborough statement: Cameron and Miliband apologise". BBC Democracy Live. 12 September 2012. Retrieved 12 September 2012.
  7. ^ "Kelvin MacKenzie offers "profuse apologies" over Hillsborough". ITV.com. 12 September 2012. Retrieved 12 September 2012.
  8. Hillsborough files: Calls to strip Sir Irvine Patnick of knighthood The Scotsman
  9. Hillsborough: The Report of the Hillsborough Independent Panel, pages 350-352.
  10. Hillsborough disaster: new inquest likely after damning report The Guardian
  11. "Hillsborough disaster report published - Wednesday 12 September". Guardian.co.uk. 12 Sep 2012.
  12. We'll get justice for tragic 96, writes Andy Burnham Daily Mirror
  13. Hillsborough files - Reaction to release of government papers BBC News

This article is a stub. You can help Misplaced Pages by expanding it.

Categories: