Misplaced Pages

Talk:Tanka prose: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactivelyNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 00:26, 13 September 2012 editHijiri88 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users37,390 edits Elvenscout742 moved page Talk:Tanka prose to Talk:Uta monogatari over redirect: Re-moving the page in accordance with the arguments made previously. You can't just make up terms and expect others to follow -- uta monogatari and diaries are dist...  Revision as of 13:22, 14 September 2012 edit undoHijiri88 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users37,390 editsNo edit summaryNext edit →
Line 1: Line 1:
#REDIRECT ] #REDIRECT ]

<Although for the record, even though I encourage you to make an article on "tanka prose" now, I still haven't seen any evidence that it is notable or belongs on Misplaced Pages. You do still need to provide reliable, secondary sources, and I still don't recognize the articles and books you have cited as valid references for Misplaced Pages. They have so many errors. I haven't read the McCullough piece you cited, but I highly doubt it makes a claim that virtually of classical Japanese literature belongs to a "genus" called "tanka prose". And also the ''Kojiki'' does not contain short prose passages to explain background of poems. It is not a poetic anthology. It is a prose work. (And not all the poems in either it or the ''Man'youshuu'' are tanka anyway, so the name "tanka prose" is silly.) ] (]) 13:21, 14 September 2012 (UTC) >

Revision as of 13:22, 14 September 2012

Redirect to:

<Although for the record, even though I encourage you to make an article on "tanka prose" now, I still haven't seen any evidence that it is notable or belongs on Misplaced Pages. You do still need to provide reliable, secondary sources, and I still don't recognize the articles and books you have cited as valid references for Misplaced Pages. They have so many errors. I haven't read the McCullough piece you cited, but I highly doubt it makes a claim that virtually of classical Japanese literature belongs to a "genus" called "tanka prose". And also the Kojiki does not contain short prose passages to explain background of poems. It is not a poetic anthology. It is a prose work. (And not all the poems in either it or the Man'youshuu are tanka anyway, so the name "tanka prose" is silly.) elvenscout742 (talk) 13:21, 14 September 2012 (UTC) >