| Revision as of 14:05, 3 October 2012 editMasanori Asami (talk | contribs)232 edits →Ryukyus← Previous edit | Revision as of 14:30, 3 October 2012 edit undoMasanori Asami (talk | contribs)232 edits →RyukyusNext edit → | ||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
| In '''English''', "Ryukyu Islands" refers to everything between Taiwan and Kyushu, even if there are different names in Japanese.—] (]) 13:30, 2 October 2012 (UTC) | In '''English''', "Ryukyu Islands" refers to everything between Taiwan and Kyushu, even if there are different names in Japanese.—] (]) 13:30, 2 October 2012 (UTC) | ||
| {{Wikisource|Treaty of San Francisco}} | |||
| I wrote the definition of "Ryukyu Islands" different from Japanese definition of "琉球諸島". Japanese definition of "琉球諸島" does not incluide Amami islands, but I wrote the definition of "Ryukyu Islands" include Amami islands. | I wrote the definition of "Ryukyu Islands" different from Japanese definition of "琉球諸島". Japanese definition of "琉球諸島" does not incluide Amami islands, but I wrote the definition of "Ryukyu Islands" include Amami islands. | ||
| Line 21: | Line 23: | ||
| For the word "Ryukyu Islands", most important aim is to understand the article 3 of "Treaty of San Francisco".Misplaced Pages must provide the definition that the interpretation of the treaty is possible. | For the word "Ryukyu Islands", most important aim is to understand the article 3 of "Treaty of San Francisco".Misplaced Pages must provide the definition that the interpretation of the treaty is possible. | ||
| (] (]) 14: |
(] (]) 14:30, 3 October 2012 (UTC)) | ||
Revision as of 14:30, 3 October 2012
I am writing Daikon-island now.Masanori Asami 00:24, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
浅見さんはどうしてそんなに大根島に執着するのですか？
どうしてですか？Everton 09:56, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
返事が非常に遅くなってすみません。 ノーマークで噴火口付近に保育園とかがある大根島が噴火の危険があると思ったからです。
(Masanori Asami (talk) 10:41, 30 September 2012 (UTC))
Ryukyus
In English, "Ryukyu Islands" refers to everything between Taiwan and Kyushu, even if there are different names in Japanese.—Ryulong (琉竜) 13:30, 2 October 2012 (UTC)
I wrote the definition of "Ryukyu Islands" different from Japanese definition of "琉球諸島". Japanese definition of "琉球諸島" does not incluide Amami islands, but I wrote the definition of "Ryukyu Islands" include Amami islands.
Moreover, according to your definition of "Ryukyu Islands", you cannot understand the phraze of "Nansei Shoto south of 29° north latitude (including the Ryukyu Islands and the Daito Islands)" in the article 3 of "Treaty of San Francisco".
For the word "Ryukyu Islands", most important aim is to understand the article 3 of "Treaty of San Francisco".Misplaced Pages must provide the definition that the interpretation of the treaty is possible.