| Revision as of 19:39, 6 October 2012 editBiosketch (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users5,900 edits →Edit warring: +← Previous edit | Revision as of 20:20, 6 October 2012 edit undoBbb23 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators270,849 edits →Edit warring: formal warning of Palestine-Israel sanctionsNext edit → | ||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
| I advised you to proceed to the Discussion page at ] rather than reintroduce your unreliable 972 magazine sources, but you've neglected to take that advice into consideration. Consequently, you're now in violation of the article's restriction on performing more than 1 revert over a 24-hour period. If you do not self-revert within a reasonable time and endeavor to gain consensus for you edits on the Discussion page, you risk having your IP address's editing privileges revoked.—] (]) 19:32, 6 October 2012 (UTC) | I advised you to proceed to the Discussion page at ] rather than reintroduce your unreliable 972 magazine sources, but you've neglected to take that advice into consideration. Consequently, you're now in violation of the article's restriction on performing more than 1 revert over a 24-hour period. If you do not self-revert within a reasonable time and endeavor to gain consensus for you edits on the Discussion page, you risk having your IP address's editing privileges revoked.—] (]) 19:32, 6 October 2012 (UTC) | ||
| :And since you've indicated that you're aware of the 1rr restriction but have declined to self-revert, there's now an edit-warring case involving you ].—] (]) 19:39, 6 October 2012 (UTC) | :And since you've indicated that you're aware of the 1rr restriction but have declined to self-revert, there's now an edit-warring case involving you ].—] (]) 19:39, 6 October 2012 (UTC) | ||
| == Warning: Discretionary sanctions on all Israel/Palestine-related articles == | |||
| As a result of ], the ] has acknowledged long-term and persistent problems in the editing of articles related to the ], broadly understood. As a result, the Committee has enacted broad ], described ] and below. | |||
| *Any uninvolved administrator may, on his or her own discretion, impose sanctions on any editor working in the area of conflict if, despite being warned, that editor repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Misplaced Pages, any expected standards of behavior, or any normal editorial process. | |||
| *The sanctions imposed may include blocks of up to one year in length; bans from editing any page or set of pages within the area of conflict; bans on any editing related to the topic or its closely related topics; restrictions on reverts or other specified behaviors; or any other measures which the imposing administrator believes are reasonably necessary to ensure the smooth functioning of the project. | |||
| *Prior to any sanctions being imposed, the editor in question shall be given a warning with a link to this decision; and, where appropriate, should be counseled on specific steps that he or she can take to improve his or her editing in accordance with relevant policies and guidelines. | |||
| *Discretionary sanctions imposed under the provisions of this decision may be appealed to the imposing administrator, the appropriate administrators' noticeboard (currently ]), or the Committee. | |||
| These editing restrictions may be applied to any editor for cause, provided the editor has been previously informed of the case. This message is to so inform you. This message does not necessarily mean that your current editing has been deemed a problem; this is a template message crafted to make it easier to notify any user who has edited the topic of the existence of these sanctions. | |||
| Generally, the next step, if an administrator feels your conduct on pages in this topic area is disruptive, would be a warning, to be followed by the imposition of sanctions (although in cases of serious disruption, the warning may be omitted). Hopefully no such action will be necessary. | |||
| This notice is only effective if given by an uninvolved administrator and logged ].--] (]) 20:20, 6 October 2012 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 20:20, 6 October 2012
Edit warring
I advised you to proceed to the Discussion page at Racism in Israel rather than reintroduce your unreliable 972 magazine sources, but you've neglected to take that advice into consideration. Consequently, you're now in violation of the article's restriction on performing more than 1 revert over a 24-hour period. If you do not self-revert within a reasonable time and endeavor to gain consensus for you edits on the Discussion page, you risk having your IP address's editing privileges revoked.—Biosketch (talk) 19:32, 6 October 2012 (UTC)
- And since you've indicated that you're aware of the 1rr restriction but have declined to self-revert, there's now an edit-warring case involving you here.—Biosketch (talk) 19:39, 6 October 2012 (UTC)
Warning: Discretionary sanctions on all Israel/Palestine-related articles
As a result of an arbitration case, the Arbitration Committee has acknowledged long-term and persistent problems in the editing of articles related to the Palestinian-Israeli conflict, broadly understood. As a result, the Committee has enacted broad editing restrictions, described here and below.
- Any uninvolved administrator may, on his or her own discretion, impose sanctions on any editor working in the area of conflict if, despite being warned, that editor repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Misplaced Pages, any expected standards of behavior, or any normal editorial process.
- The sanctions imposed may include blocks of up to one year in length; bans from editing any page or set of pages within the area of conflict; bans on any editing related to the topic or its closely related topics; restrictions on reverts or other specified behaviors; or any other measures which the imposing administrator believes are reasonably necessary to ensure the smooth functioning of the project.
- Prior to any sanctions being imposed, the editor in question shall be given a warning with a link to this decision; and, where appropriate, should be counseled on specific steps that he or she can take to improve his or her editing in accordance with relevant policies and guidelines.
- Discretionary sanctions imposed under the provisions of this decision may be appealed to the imposing administrator, the appropriate administrators' noticeboard (currently WP:AE), or the Committee.
These editing restrictions may be applied to any editor for cause, provided the editor has been previously informed of the case. This message is to so inform you. This message does not necessarily mean that your current editing has been deemed a problem; this is a template message crafted to make it easier to notify any user who has edited the topic of the existence of these sanctions.
Generally, the next step, if an administrator feels your conduct on pages in this topic area is disruptive, would be a warning, to be followed by the imposition of sanctions (although in cases of serious disruption, the warning may be omitted). Hopefully no such action will be necessary.
This notice is only effective if given by an uninvolved administrator and logged here.--Bbb23 (talk) 20:20, 6 October 2012 (UTC)