Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 21:39, 7 October 2012

Archived discussions available at: User talk:Fry1989/Archive1.

Acknowledgements

Thank you

		The Modest Barnstar
		Thanks for your recent contributions! Mike Restivo (talk) 19:10, 21 February 2011 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Graphic Designer's Barnstar
	DevinCook (talk) 23:22, 17 August 2011 (UTC)

Discussions ↓↓↓

Dry counties map

You might want to change the dry counties map to reflect changes in Virginia. This is the most recent ABC report mentioning dry counties in Virginia. Artsygeek (talk) 05:29, 6 October 2012 (UTC)

I will work on it when I can, thanks for the link. Fry1989 21:05, 7 October 2012 (UTC)

Request

I would be grateful if you would stop your campaign of cross-wiki harassment. I have stopped commenting on you at this site, and even supported your unblock, but you have repaid that kindness by following me around commons, reverting my edits there without explanation while tagging the revert as minor, nominating the files I uploaded for deletion, and calling me names. Please stop it. DrKiernan (talk) 20:02, 7 October 2012 (UTC)

The lifting of the prior indef was obviously inappropriate and it should be restored. Enough is enough, as they say. Br'er Rabbit (talk) 20:16, 7 October 2012 (UTC)

Br'er Rabbit, it was nothing of the sort, you can't block me for actions on a different project, Commons and Misplaced Pages English are completely different places (besides the fact there is absolutely no proof of "cross-wiki harassment"). Drkiernan, I don't like you and you don't like me, you've called me names and I've done the same. I have a right to my opinion and it's not gonna change, but the both of you know I have completely obeyed my restrictions for an unblock on Misplaced Pages English. Fry1989 20:58, 7 October 2012 (UTC)

Also how I mark my edits is my own business, but if you MUST know, I have my user settings on Commons to automatically mark my edits as minor. If you don't like that option, take it up with the programmers of Commons, but it's my right to put my settings how I want them. Also I don't follow you (or anyone else for that matter) around, every day I go through the new files log on both Commons and Misplaced Pages English, I happened to come across Trajan's files yesterday, and looking at their history I saw what you did. You added a *fictitious* tag to them with absolutely no proof, and now you're nominating them for deletion just because Trajan removed your tag a further two times. As for the link to the nomination I made on one of your uploads, what Drkiernan isn't telling people who see this is that after his file was deleted, he uploaded it a second time, instead of the proper process of a UnDeletion Request. It was deleted a second time because of the improper process, and then he uploaded it locally to English Misplaced Pages and forced it on all the pages the Commons file was used, just to get his way, instead of talking it out on Commons and getting a consensus (which there now is, and I've left the issue alone since!) You act this way, people have a right to their opinions about it. That's all I have to say on the matter. Fry1989 21:04, 7 October 2012 (UTC)

There was an undeletion request : it found in my favor. DrKiernan (talk) 21:26, 7 October 2012 (UTC)

There's nothing wrong with marking fictitious coats of arms as fictitious, or nominating files not useful for an encyclopedic purpose for deletion. Stop following me around and opposing me at every opportunity just because you hate me. DrKiernan (talk) 21:12, 7 October 2012 (UTC)

I DON'T FOLLOW YOU AROUND! I've already made it clear that I check the upload logs daily for new files which pertain to my interests and knowledge (coats of arms, flags, signs...). If you wanna to continue assuming I'm following you around, that's your own insecurity. I don't hate you for just any reason (infact hate is a strong word), I dislike you because of the way we have interacted over 2 years. You've pushed me, you've bullied me, you've been rude to me, and I am tired of it. Suddenly when I push back just a little, I'm the one with a "cross-wiki harassment campaign", even though the fact remains that whenever there has been consensus on an issue I walk away, and that Trajan contacted me asking for my input on the DR you created, I wasn't even aware of it until he did, and I simply stated my personal opinion on my talk page. You're the one who always follows me to see what I have to say. Fry1989 21:19, 7 October 2012 (UTC)

You followed me to the three coats of arms. You followed me to the deletion request. You edited all the pages after me, so I'm obviously not following you. You are following me. I'm asking you to avoid me, please. DrKiernan (talk) 21:26, 7 October 2012 (UTC)

I think ANI review of Fry's continued participation is in order. Br'er Rabbit (talk) 21:31, 7 October 2012 (UTC)

What the hell for? I have done absolutely nothing on English Misplaced Pages since my unblock, my checking the upload logs perfectly explains why I came across the files, and Trajan ASKED ME for my input in the DR. What was I supposed to do, say no? I removed Drkiernan's fictitious tags once, I haven't done anything to the files since. Trajan removed the tag a further two times, which is when Drkiernan nominated them for deletion. I was completely unaware of it until after Trajan asked me to have my say in the DR, and the time-stamps prove that. Fry1989 21:35, 7 October 2012 (UTC)

Again, I DID NOT FOLLOW YOU', every file that is uploaded or is changed shows up in the upload log. I go through them every day. Trajan's files were new, so I of course came across them. The fact that I clicked on them, saw the fictitious tag and went to the file history to see why it was there, then removed it, does not make me the stalker you're trying to paint me as. It could just as easily have been any other user on Commons who added the tag and I still would have removed it if there was no proof of the files' fitionality. You admitted in your own edit summaries the shields are true, and I've stated in the DR that I think it's perfectly reasonable to assume the shields came with a full achievement. You don't have any more proof they're fake than we do they're real at the moment, and a fictitious tag is a serious thing, it needs proof. Fry1989 21:35, 7 October 2012 (UTC)