Revision as of 08:10, 19 October 2012 editBencherlite (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users65,622 edits →William Jennings Bryan presidential campaign, 1896: oppose and alternative← Previous edit | Revision as of 08:13, 19 October 2012 edit undoCrisco 1492 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators138,390 edits →November 1: several opposes, diversity issuesNext edit → | ||
Line 198: | Line 198: | ||
:*Last episode was at least "Last Temptation of Krust" in May. The last TV-related topic was a character, Poppy Meadow, in August. — ] (]) 16:19, 6 October 2012 (UTC) | :*Last episode was at least "Last Temptation of Krust" in May. The last TV-related topic was a character, Poppy Meadow, in August. — ] (]) 16:19, 6 October 2012 (UTC) | ||
::*Thanks. That seems fine. ] (]) 13:20, 13 October 2012 (UTC) | ::*Thanks. That seems fine. ] (]) 13:20, 13 October 2012 (UTC) | ||
=== November 1 === | |||
==== Stephen Crane ==== | |||
<div style="width: 55%; background-color: #f5fffa; border: 1px solid #cef2e0; margin-bottom: 1em; padding: 0.5em 1em 1em; color: black;" class="ui-helper-clearfix"> | |||
<div style="float: right; margin-left: 1.5em;"> | |||
] | |||
</div> | |||
<div> | |||
''']''' (1871–1900) was an American novelist, short story writer, poet and journalist. Prolific throughout his short life, he wrote notable works in the ] tradition as well as early examples of American ] and ]. Crane's first novel was the 1893 ] tale '']''. He won international acclaim for his 1895 ] novel '']'', written without any battle experience. Late that year he accepted an offer to cover the ] as a ]. As he waited in ] for passage to Cuba, he met ], the madam of a brothel, with whom he would have a lasting relationship. Plagued by financial difficulties and ill health, Crane died of ] at the age of 28. Although recognized primarily for ''The Red Badge of Courage'', Crane is also known for short stories such as "]", "]", "]", and '']''. Stylistically, his works are characterized by vivid intensity, distinctive ]s, and ]. Common themes involve fear, spiritual crises and social isolation. His writing made a deep impression on 20th century writers, most prominent among them ], and is thought to have inspired the ] and the ]. (])</div></div> | |||
* Writer on birthday, interesting bio, too bad that some will have to be trimmed ;) --] (]) 14:03, 5 October 2012 (UTC) | |||
*'''Support''' important author. --''']]]''' 18:03, 5 October 2012 (UTC) | |||
* '''Oppose''' because too similar to the recent TFA '']'' - both are about American lit; he's a naturalist as is Dillard, and both written by the same editor. I would be more than happy to support this at a later date and I think more thought should be put into these suggestions because it's not nice to have to oppose. ] (]) 18:23, 5 October 2012 (UTC) | |||
* Nominator needs to calculate points for us to reflect any recent similar TFAs.--] (]) 18:29, 5 October 2012 (UTC) | |||
*:Needs OCLC numbers for every book written before the 1970s before I'll support.--] (]) 03:05, 6 October 2012 (UTC) | |||
*'''Support''' Per Rschen7754. I think the connection to PaTC is reaching, to be honest. I looked through the past few months and I don't see any recent similar TFAs. ] (]) 22:27, 5 October 2012 (UTC) | |||
*:Yeah and they'd be roughly a month and a half apart. --''']]]''' 22:29, 5 October 2012 (UTC) | |||
*'''Support''' This is a very important writer, <s>neglected on wikipedia,</s> way above the level of '']'' IMO. And writing about an important era (the Civil War) in American history. So should be on the main page on his birthday. ] (]) 23:53, 5 October 2012 (UTC) | |||
*:To be fair, there are four Crane-related FAs, two of which I believe have been featured on the mainpage. <span style="font-family:verdana">] </span><small>(]])</small> 13:56, 6 October 2012 (UTC) | |||
*::Sorry, you're right. Doesn't change my "Support" though. According to ]: "The good writers are ], Stephen Crane, and ]. That's not the order they're good in. There is no order for good writers." ] (]) 14:35, 6 October 2012 (UTC) | |||
*:::You'll get no argument from me as to Crane's notability; I'm a huge fan, hence the four FAs. I'm neither opposing nor supporting this nomination, I just thought your comment strange considering. <span style="font-family:verdana">] </span><small>(]])</small> 15:04, 6 October 2012 (UTC) | |||
*::::Yes, I was unaware. I've not been following FA/FAC for very long. ] (]) 15:15, 6 October 2012 (UTC) | |||
* '''Oppose''' because too similar to the recent TFA '']'' on September 17, per Truthkeeper. Fine in the New Year. ] (]) 16:13, 6 October 2012 (UTC) | |||
* <s>'''Support'''</s> as ''Tinker Creek'' is a book while this is a biography. Similar, but not too similar, IMHO. — ] (]) 16:24, 6 October 2012 (UTC) | |||
*:Agree with Crisco. Crane was not "a naturalist as is Dillard". The word "]" is being misapplied. For Crane the word refers to his introduction of realism, not that he concentrated on writing about nature. "Naturalism was a literary movement taking place from the 1880s to 1940s that used detailed realism to suggest that social conditions, heredity, and environment had inescapable force in shaping human character." Is this the same as Dillard? Their writing is not similar, nor their topics, nor their level of fame and influence on literature. He was primarily a writer of fiction and did not write as ''Pilgrim at Tinker Creek'' is described: "Told from a first-person point of view, the book details an unnamed narrator's explorations near her home, and various contemplations on nature and life". ] (]) 16:40, 6 October 2012 (UTC) | |||
*:: I'm sorry MathewTownsend but I have to disagree. I have on my computer desktop a Cambridge Companion book titled ''American Realism and Naturalism'' with a chapter devoted to Crane. In American lit., naturalism (which doesn't necessarily have to do with nature, but sometimes does) began pre-Civil war with ] and the ] (though they were the forerunners), took off fully with Crane, Twain, Dreiser, Sinclair and others after the Civil war, continued with Hemingway (see "]") and Faulkner mid-century and certainly is seen in Dillard. All this is beside the point though; I made a very pointy oppose, for which I feel awful to the point that I will send Maria email to apologize yet again, because I feel this page is being misused. How many articles do we have about American literature? How many editors do we have writing about American literature? These are considerations to keep in mind. Furthermore, since when does the primary editor have the obligation to write the blurb and to provide OLCL numbers (as requested above), particularly when editors are simultaneously being accused of ownership issues. Something's very rotten in Denmark is the point I'm trying to make; and quite frankly this is an issue that's gone once to RfAR. In my view another trip there might not be a bad idea. This page should be used for editors to request main page appearance for articles to which they've contributed, not to be used as a place to post willy-nilly without thinking about long-term ramifications. I didn't support ''Tinker Creek'' and had that not run, I'd be happy to see Crane go now. I believe Crane should go and am upset to see the mess that's been made here. ] (]) 18:49, 6 October 2012 (UTC) | |||
*::: You decry concerns of ownership and then immediately express the view that proposals for main page appearance should only be made by significant contributors to articles. Obvious issue, right? Any wonder that there are calls for this culture to end? ] (]) 19:29, 6 October 2012 (UTC) | |||
*:::: No, Jack. I've never used this page and Gerda put a message on my page inviting me to join the conversation. You're letting your personal animus get in the way of seeing the obvious problems: Austen nominated now when a major anniversary looms in four months (maybe the author knows about that?); British royalty nominated now when another major anniversary looms (where's the spot for that request?). A major American author nominated a few weeks after another book by an American author, when today yet another book is being run. We simply don't have that many lit. pages and they need to be spread out. I don't care if you change this place or not, but some kind of order or thought needs to be put into the nominations - order and thought that seems currently to be lacking. You can decry the ownership issue all you like, but if you have issues with it, try bringing forward solutions better than those that have been brought forward. ] (]) 19:47, 6 October 2012 (UTC) | |||
*::::: Sorry to hear about your private concerns. - To these facts: Austen was nominated now, but can very well appear on the anniversary if that is what gets consensus, 2013 that is. If so, I don't see why a male author and a book by a female US author should not appear within the same quarter, --] (]) 20:16, 6 October 2012 (UTC) | |||
*::::: {{ec}}On the contrary, I think Gerda has done a great job nominating articles (which very few people are willing to do) and deserves to be thanked--not criticised. Raul and Dabomb need our help, and we should be encouraging people who try to {{diff|Misplaced Pages talk:Today's featured article/requests|prev|479134465|make their lives easier}}. I encourage anyone unhappy with the job a volunteer here is doing to step up and try to do it better. ] (]) 20:24, 6 October 2012 (UTC) | |||
*::::: As to whether this is too close to have articles generally related to American literature together--that's a matter of personal opinion, maybe it is and maybe it isn't. We just have to wait for more people to show up here and form a consensus. ] (]) 20:24, 6 October 2012 (UTC) | |||
*::::: My name's not Jack. Note that I've not supported this TFA suggestion. This is a forum for discussing potential TFA and... they're being discussed. And don't be attacking Gerda. She's sincere, mellow, and we've a paucity of good female participants on this project. ] (]) 20:47, 6 October 2012 (UTC) | |||
*:::::: (blushing, again) --] (]) 20:58, 6 October 2012 (UTC) | |||
{{od}}Regarding Crisco's comment above about one article being a biography and the other about a book: (see footnote 5 above) "Similar is defined differently than the categories at WP:FA: two dissimilar articles may be grouped under the same category. For example, two film articles would be considered similar but an article about a newspaper and one about a film may be both grouped under Media but would not be considered similar. Conversely, similar articles may be in different categories at WP:FA: for example, Atom and Noble gas." ] (]) 23:33, 6 October 2012 (UTC) | |||
:*Indeed. In this case I find it dissimilar enough to not be an issue. If this were a novel and then a short story came along, there might be pause, but novel and author are different enough I think — ] (]) 00:01, 7 October 2012 (UTC) | |||
::*We have, in the past, viewed a creator and then a creation as not similar, assuming that they are not related (i.e. don't run ''The Red Badge of Courage'' right after Crane.)--] (]) 14:03, 8 October 2012 (UTC) | |||
*'''Support''' ] ] 19:24, 14 October 2012 (UTC) | |||
*'''Oppose''' per Truthkeeper88 and Johnbod...] (]) 19:40, 16 October 2012 (UTC) | |||
*'''Oppose''': if ] appears on October 23 (see above), that will make two male author/journalists on the mainpage in as many weeks. Seeing as how this nom already has several opposes, I think the other one should take precedence. Not to mention, the 50th Bond anniversary is surely more important than Crane's 141st birthday. <span style="font-family:verdana">] </span><small>(]])</small> 20:28, 16 October 2012 (UTC) | |||
*'''Oppose''' as Ian Fleming should take priority. — ] (]) 00:46, 17 October 2012 (UTC) | |||
*'''Comment''' Fleming is scheduled, --] (]) 23:06, 18 October 2012 (UTC) | |||
:*I'm not sure why this is still here. 5 opposes, 4 supports, an extremely similar article scheduled eight days before this is proposed to run. Surely this nomination should be removed? <span style="font-family:verdana">] </span><small>(]])</small> 23:33, 18 October 2012 (UTC) | |||
::*Not so sure, do you think two authors of different eras are "extremely similar"? --] (]) 23:54, 18 October 2012 (UTC) | |||
:::*Two anglo-male author/journalists featured on the mainpage within 8 days? Yes, they're extremely similar. This nom should be removed so that a more diverse article can take its place. <span style="font-family:verdana">] </span><small>(]])</small> 00:13, 19 October 2012 (UTC) | |||
::::*This needs to go...] (]) 00:16, 19 October 2012 (UTC) | |||
*'''Oppose''' given Ian Fleming's selection. Gerda, please bring this back some other time. ]] 08:04, 19 October 2012 (UTC) | |||
=== November 4 === | === November 4 === |
Revision as of 08:13, 19 October 2012
Here the community can nominate articles to be selected as "Today's featured article" (TFA) on the main page. The TFA section aims to highlight the range of articles that have "featured article" status, from Art and architecture through to Warfare, and wherever possible it tries to avoid similar topics appearing too close together without good reason. Requests are not the only factor in scheduling the TFA (see Choosing Today's Featured Article); the final decision rests with the TFA coordinators: Wehwalt, Dank, Gog the Mild and SchroCat, who also select TFAs for dates where no suggestions are put forward. Please confine requests to this page, and remember that community endorsement on this page does not necessarily mean the article will appear on the requested date.
If you have an exceptional request that deviates from these instructions (for example, an article making a second appearance as TFA, or a "double-header"), please discuss the matter with the TFA coordinators beforehand. It can be helpful to add the article to the pending requests template, if the desired date for the article is beyond the 30-day period. This does not guarantee selection, but does help others see what nominations may be forthcoming. Requesters should still nominate the article here during the 30-day time-frame. |
Shortcuts
Featured article candidates (FAC): Featured article review (FAR): Today's featured article (TFA):
Featured article tools: | ||||||||
How to post a new nomination:
Scheduling: In the absence of exceptional circumstances, TFAs are scheduled in date order, not according to how long nominations have been open or how many supportive comments they have. So, for example, January 31 will not be scheduled until January 30 has been scheduled (by TFAR nomination or otherwise). |
Summary chart
Currently accepting requests from March 1 to March 31.
Shortcuts The TFAR requests page is currently accepting nominations from March 1 to March 31. Articles for dates beyond then can be listed here, but please note that doing so does not count as a nomination and does not guarantee selection. Before listing here, please check for dead links using checklinks or otherwise, and make sure all statements have good references. This is particularly important for older FAs and reruns. | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Date | Article | Reason | Primary author(s) | Added by (if different) | |
2025: | |||||
March 1 | Meurig ab Arthfael | Why | Dudley Miles | Sheila1988 | |
March 18 | Edward the Martyr | Why | Amitchell125 | Sheila1988 | |
April 1 | Bart Simpson (rerun, first TFA was April 19, 2015) | Why | 750h+ | Xeroctic | |
April 12 | Dolly de Leon | Why | Pseud 14 | ||
April 15 | Lady Blue (TV series) | Why | Aoba47 | Harizotoh9 | |
April 18 | Battle of Poison Spring | Why | HF | ||
April 24 | "I'm God" | Why | Skyshifter | ||
April 25 | 1925 FA Cup final | Why | Kosack | Dank | |
May | 21st Waffen Mountain Division of the SS Skanderbeg (re-run, first TFA was May 14, 2015) | Why | Peacemaker67 | ||
May 6 | Kingdom Hearts: Chain of Memories | Why | Harizotoh9 | ||
May 10 | Ben&Ben | Why | Pseud 14 | ||
May 11 | Valley Parade | Why | Harizotoh9 | ||
May 11 | Mother (Meghan Trainor song) | Why | MaranoFan | ||
May 17 | Bad Blood (Taylor Swift song) | Why | Ippantekina | Jlwoodwa | |
June | The Combat: Woman Pleading for the Vanquished | Why | iridescent | Harizotoh9 | |
June 1 | Namco | Why | Harizotoh9 | ||
June 3 | David Evans (RAAF officer) | Why | Harizotoh9 | ||
June 5 | Jaws (film) | Why | 750h+ | ||
June 6 | American logistics in the Northern France campaign | Why | Hawkeye7 | Sheila1988 | |
June 8 | Barbara Bush | Why | Harizotoh9 | ||
June 23 | Battle of Groix | Why | Jackyd101 | Jlwoodwa | |
June 26 | Donkey Kong Land | Why | TheJoebro64 | Jlwoodwa | |
July 1 | Maple syrup | Why | Nikkimaria | Dank | |
July 7 | Gustav Mahler | Why | Brianboulton | Dank | |
July 14 | William Hanna | Why | Rlevse | Dank | |
July 26 | Liz Truss | Why | Tim O'Doherty | Tim O'Doherty and Dank | |
July 29 | Tiger | Why | LittleJerry | ||
July 31 | Battle of Warsaw (1705) | Why | Imonoz | Harizotoh9 | |
August 4 | Death of Ms Dhu | Why | Freikorp | AirshipJungleman29 | |
August 23 | Yugoslav torpedo boat T3 | Why | Peacemaker67 | ||
August 25 | Born to Run | Why | Zmbro | Jlwoodwa | |
August 30 | Late Registration | Why | Harizotoh9 | ||
September 2 | 1905–06 New Brompton F.C. season | Why | Harizotoh9 | ||
September 6 | Hurricane Ophelia (2005) | Why | Harizotoh9 | ||
September 20 | Myst V: End of Ages | Why | Harizotoh9 | ||
September 30 | Battle of Morlaix | Why | Gog the Mild | ||
September 30 or October 1 | Hoover Dam | Why | NortyNort, Wehwalt | Dank | |
October 1 | Yugoslav torpedo boat T4 | Why | Peacemaker67 | ||
October 3 | Spaghetti House siege | Why | SchroCat | Dank | |
October 10 | Tragic Kingdom | Why | EA Swyer | Harizotoh9 | |
October 16 | Angela Lansbury | Why | Midnightblueowl | MisawaSakura | |
October 18 | Royal Artillery Memorial | Why | HJ Mitchell | Ham II | |
October 29 | John Bullock Clark | Why | HF | ||
November 1 | Matanikau Offensive | Why | Harizotoh9 | ||
November 19 | Water Under the Bridge | Why | MaranoFan | ||
November 20 | Nuremberg trials | Why | buidhe | harizotoh9 | |
November 21 | Canoe River train crash | Why | Wehwalt | ||
December 25 | Marcus Trescothick | Why | Harizotoh9 | ||
December 30 | William Anderson (RAAF officer) | Why | Ian Rose | Jlwoodwa | |
2026: | |||||
January 27 | History of the Jews in Dęblin and Irena during World War II | Why | Harizotoh9 | ||
February 27 | Raichu | Why | Kung Fu Man | ||
March 13 | Swift Justice | Why | Harizotoh9 | ||
March 22 | Chris Redfield | Why | Boneless Pizza! | ||
May 5 | Me Too (Meghan Trainor song) | Why | MaranoFan | ||
May 30 | Bejeweled (video game) | Why | Lazman321 | ||
June 1 | Rhine campaign of 1796 | Why | harizotoh9 | ||
June 8 | Types Riot | Why | Z1720 | ||
July 1 | Mount Edziza | Why | User:Volcanoguy | Sheila1988 | |
July 23 | Veronica Clare | Why | Harizotoh9 | ||
September 6 | Assassination of William McKinley | Why | Wehwalt | czar | |
September 20 | Persona (series) | Why | Harizotoh9 | ||
November | The Story of Miss Moppet | Why | Harizotoh9 | ||
November 11 | U.S. Route 101 | Why | SounderBruce | ||
October 15 | Easy on Me | Why | MaranoFan | ||
November 20 | Tôn Thất Đính | Why | Harizotoh9 | ||
December 21 | Fredonian Rebellion | Why | Harizotoh9 | ||
December 22 | Title (song) | Why | MaranoFan | ||
2027: | |||||
June | 1987 (What the Fuck Is Going On?) | Why | |||
August 25 | Genghis Khan | Why | AirshipJungleman29 | ||
October 15 | The Motherland Calls | Why | Joeyquism |
Date | Article | Points | Notes | Supports | Opposes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Nonspecific 1 | |||||
Nonspecific 2 | |||||
Nonspecific 3 | Hadji Ali | 2 | 2 for no similar article appearing within six months | 3 | 0 |
Nonspecific 4 | |||||
Nonspecific 5 | Porbeagle | 2 | 0 | ||
October 29 | Give Peace a Chance (Grey's Anatomy) | 3 | Date relevance, nomination by significant contributor, and no related article featured within 3 months. | 8 | 1 |
November 1 | Stephen Crane | Birthday | 5 | 4 | |
November 4 | Gabriel Fauré | 5 | Day of death, no article similar in over 6 months(composers, not operas), widely covered | 1 | 0 |
November 5 | Thomas Percy (Gunpowder Plot) | day of death | 4 | 0 | |
November 6 | William Jennings Bryan presidential campaign, 1896 | Day significant | 2 | 0 | |
November 13 | Horseshoe Curve (Pennsylvania) | Day significant -- anniversary of date listed on National Register of Historic Places and as National Historic Landmark | 2 | 0 | |
November 17 | Metroid Prime | 5 | Tenth anniversary, 2008 FA, nomination by significant contributor | 3 | 0 |
November 20 | Windsor Castle | 4 | 20th anniversary of the fire; widely covered topic | 1 | 0 |
Tally may not be up to date; please do not use these tallies for removing a nomination according to criteria 1 or 3 above unless you have verified the numbers. The nominator is included in the number of supporters.
Nonspecific date nominations
Nonspecific date 1
Nonspecific date 2
Nonspecific date 3
Hadji Ali
Hadji Ali (c. 1888–92 – 1937) was a vaudeville performance artist famous for acts of controlled regurgitation. Thought to be of Egyptian extraction, his best-known feats included water spouting, smoke swallowing and nut and handkerchief swallowing followed by disgorgement in an order chosen by the audience. The mainstay of Ali's act was "water spouting." After swallowing large amounts of water, 60 to 100 glasses at a time, he spouted the water in a continuous stream for a sustained period of time, sometimes approaching one minute. Ali's most famous stunt, and the highlight of his act, was drinking copious amounts of water followed by kerosene, and then acting by turns as a human flamethrower and fire extinguisher as he expelled the two liquids onto a theatrical prop. While these stunts were performed, a panel of audience members was invited to watch the show up close to verify that no trickery was employed. Ali had a dedicated following on the vaudeville circuit in the United States and performed for heads of state including Tsar Nicholas II of Russia. Judy Garland named him her favorite vaudevillian and David Blaine identified Ali as his favorite magician. Two documentaries contain footage of Ali taken from Politiquerias: 1977's Gizmo!, and 1999's Vaudeville. Ali's unusual gastric abilities led to rumors that the Rockefeller Institute had offered a large sum of money to obtain his stomach post-mortem. After he died in England his body was offered to Johns Hopkins for study, though the offer was declined. (more...)- suggested for nonspecific date. One point for unusual topic not covered elsewhere. MathewTownsend (talk) 19:55, 14 October 2012 (UTC)
- Thank you for the nomination Mathew. Shouldn't it be three points – one for diversity and two more for no similar article appearing within six months? The question mark is because the scope of the standard is not sparklingly clear. Certainly nothing "similar" has been featured... ever. But if broadly construed, there have been actors and musicians one could I suppose classify as also being "performance artists".--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 04:08, 15 October 2012 (UTC)
- I would suggest three points, as well, but I'm somewhat biased in that I really want to see it on the main page. Mark Arsten (talk) 16:56, 15 October 2012 (UTC)
- Thank you for the nomination Mathew. Shouldn't it be three points – one for diversity and two more for no similar article appearing within six months? The question mark is because the scope of the standard is not sparklingly clear. Certainly nothing "similar" has been featured... ever. But if broadly construed, there have been actors and musicians one could I suppose classify as also being "performance artists".--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 04:08, 15 October 2012 (UTC)
- Support x2. Awesome. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 12:50, 15 October 2012 (UTC)
- Support Very well written article on a very interesting subject. Mark Arsten (talk) 16:56, 15 October 2012 (UTC)
- Support as fun. Johnbod (talk) 14:05, 17 October 2012 (UTC)
- Comment blurb is only 840 characters, about 2/3rds the appropriate length. Running a blurb that is too short messes up the balance of the sections on the main page. And "diversity" only wins a point when it's in a specified FA category, see above; this is a "culture and society" article so is 2 points. Bencherlite 21:53, 17 October 2012 (UTC)
- To Bencherlite - please see Raul's footnote 5 above: "Similar is defined differently than the categories at WP:FA: two dissimilar articles may be grouped under the same category. For example, two film articles would be considered similar but an article about a newspaper and one about a film may be both grouped under Media but would not be considered similar. Conversely, similar articles may be in different categories at WP:FA: for example, Atom and Noble gas." MathewTownsend (talk) 13:47, 18 October 2012 (UTC)
- Hello Mathew, I don't know why you feel the need to lecture me about "similarity" when my issue is with "diversity", as I thought I had made clear by using the word "diversity" not "similarity". To save you the effort of reading the instructions once more: "Subject underrepresented at WP:FA: 1 point". FN4 is: "The category where the article is listed at WP:FA has fewer than 50 featured articles. The categories which currently qualify are: Awards, decorations and vexillology; Chemistry and mineralogy; Computing; Education; Engineering and technology; Food and drink; Geology and geophysics; Health and medicine; Language and linguistics; Mathematics; Philosophy and psychology." This article is in "culture and society" i.e. no bonus point for "diversity". I have no issue with the two points claimed for "similarity", which is why I said "2 points" since 3 points claimed less 1 point wrongly claimed makes 2 points. Hope this makes sense now. Bencherlite 18:30, 18 October 2012 (UTC)
- Nope, I believe Raul's footnote and the evaluation of -Fuhghettaboutit and User:Crisco 1492 . Just my view. I'm not sure what special knowledge you have over theirs. MathewTownsend (talk) 20:00, 18 October 2012 (UTC)
- The ability to realise that the points for "similarity" and "diversity" are calculated in different ways, perhaps? It really isn't that difficult. Bencherlite 20:09, 18 October 2012 (UTC)
- yes, it is that difficult. Meant to kept newbies out perhaps? So the old crew runs everything according to rules where some FAs are on a sekret list never to be on the main page. Seems incredibly stupid to me. But then, I'm not part of the "old crew" that runs everything according to obscure rules. Of course, the "director for life" hasn't logged in for over a month. Are you his mouthpiece? MathewTownsend (talk) 20:22, 18 October 2012 (UTC)
- Is it really worth arguing about whether this should get 2 points or 3 points? Pretty much all the non-specifics with several net supports get their chance these days. Mark Arsten (talk) 20:28, 18 October 2012 (UTC)
- I'm not oppposing its selection, but if the rules are misinterpreted on this nomination without someone pointing out the error, we risk confusion in the future on a nomination where it might be more important e.g. where there are competing nominations for the same date. As there is no consensus to do away with the point system, we might as well get it right. Bencherlite 20:32, 18 October 2012 (UTC)
- Yeah, but insulting each other probably won't bring about an agreement on this issue any sooner. I think you two should scale back the hostility a bit. Mark Arsten (talk) 20:49, 18 October 2012 (UTC)
- I wasn't going to respond to him further on this topic, in fact. Bencherlite 20:52, 18 October 2012 (UTC)
- Yeah, but insulting each other probably won't bring about an agreement on this issue any sooner. I think you two should scale back the hostility a bit. Mark Arsten (talk) 20:49, 18 October 2012 (UTC)
- I'm not oppposing its selection, but if the rules are misinterpreted on this nomination without someone pointing out the error, we risk confusion in the future on a nomination where it might be more important e.g. where there are competing nominations for the same date. As there is no consensus to do away with the point system, we might as well get it right. Bencherlite 20:32, 18 October 2012 (UTC)
- Is it really worth arguing about whether this should get 2 points or 3 points? Pretty much all the non-specifics with several net supports get their chance these days. Mark Arsten (talk) 20:28, 18 October 2012 (UTC)
- yes, it is that difficult. Meant to kept newbies out perhaps? So the old crew runs everything according to rules where some FAs are on a sekret list never to be on the main page. Seems incredibly stupid to me. But then, I'm not part of the "old crew" that runs everything according to obscure rules. Of course, the "director for life" hasn't logged in for over a month. Are you his mouthpiece? MathewTownsend (talk) 20:22, 18 October 2012 (UTC)
- The ability to realise that the points for "similarity" and "diversity" are calculated in different ways, perhaps? It really isn't that difficult. Bencherlite 20:09, 18 October 2012 (UTC)
- Nope, I believe Raul's footnote and the evaluation of -Fuhghettaboutit and User:Crisco 1492 . Just my view. I'm not sure what special knowledge you have over theirs. MathewTownsend (talk) 20:00, 18 October 2012 (UTC)
- Hello Mathew, I don't know why you feel the need to lecture me about "similarity" when my issue is with "diversity", as I thought I had made clear by using the word "diversity" not "similarity". To save you the effort of reading the instructions once more: "Subject underrepresented at WP:FA: 1 point". FN4 is: "The category where the article is listed at WP:FA has fewer than 50 featured articles. The categories which currently qualify are: Awards, decorations and vexillology; Chemistry and mineralogy; Computing; Education; Engineering and technology; Food and drink; Geology and geophysics; Health and medicine; Language and linguistics; Mathematics; Philosophy and psychology." This article is in "culture and society" i.e. no bonus point for "diversity". I have no issue with the two points claimed for "similarity", which is why I said "2 points" since 3 points claimed less 1 point wrongly claimed makes 2 points. Hope this makes sense now. Bencherlite 18:30, 18 October 2012 (UTC)
- Support, presuming any summary length issue can be solved. Intriguing bio; nice graphic.hamiltonstone (talk) 22:32, 18 October 2012 (UTC)
Nonspecific date 4
Nonspecific date 5
Porbeagle
The porbeagle is a species of mackerel shark in the family Lamnidae, distributed widely in the cold and temperate marine waters of the North Atlantic and Southern Hemisphere. In the North Pacific, its ecological equivalent is the closely related salmon shark. The porbeagle typically reaches 2.5 m (8.2 ft) in length and a weight of 135 kg (298 lb); North Atlantic sharks grow larger than Southern Hemisphere sharks and differ in coloration and aspects of life history. Gray above and white below, the porbeagle has a very stout midsection that tapers towards the long, pointed snout and the narrow base of the tail. It has large pectoral and first dorsal fins, tiny pelvic, second dorsal, and anal fins, and a crescent-shaped caudal fin. The most distinctive features of this species are its three-cusped teeth, the white blotch on the back of its first dorsal fin, and the two pairs of lateral keels on its tail. Preying mainly on bony fishes and cephalopods, the porbeagle is an opportunistic hunter that regularly moves up and down in the water column, catching prey in midwater as well as off the bottom. Only a few shark attacks of uncertain provenance have been attributed to the porbeagle. It is well regarded as a game fish by recreational anglers. The meat and fins of the porbeagle are highly valued, which has led to a long history of intense human exploitation. However, this species cannot sustain heavy fishing pressure due to its low reproductive capacity. (more...)- Support PumpkinSky talk 23:02, 7 October 2012 (UTC)
- Support, no mushroom, no battleship, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 17:22, 11 October 2012 (UTC)
- The toolserver TFAR checklinks report shows four dead links. Bencherlite 23:53, 14 October 2012 (UTC)
- Cut two, updated two.PumpkinSky talk 23:53, 16 October 2012 (UTC)
- Excellent. Bencherlite 16:35, 17 October 2012 (UTC)
- Cut two, updated two.PumpkinSky talk 23:53, 16 October 2012 (UTC)
Specific date nominations
October 29
Give Peace a Chance (Grey's Anatomy)
"Give Peace a Chance" is the seventh episode of the sixth season of the American television medical drama Grey's Anatomy, and the show's 109th episode overall. Written by Peter Nowalk and directed by Chandra Wilson, the episode was originally broadcast on the American Broadcasting Company (ABC) in the United States on October 29, 2009. Grey's Anatomy centers around a group of young doctors in training. In this episode, Dr. Derek Shepherd (Patrick Dempsey, pictured) performs an operation on a hospital technician's "inoperable" tumor, despite the objections of the chief of surgery, Dr. Richard Webber (James Pickens, Jr.). The episode was designed to revolve around Dempsey's character. Mark Saul, Jesse Williams, and Nora Zehetner returned as guest stars, while Faran Tahir made his first and only appearance. Viewed by 13.74 million people, "Give Peace a Chance" won Wilson an NAACP Image Award for directing, and was generally well received among critics. (more...)Three points: One point for date relevance (three year anniversary of premiere), one point for being a significant contributor/never having an article as TFA, and one point for no television/film article featured within 3 months of the requested date. Recently promoted FA. TRLIJC19 (talk • contribs) 19:08, 1 October 2012 (UTC)
- Support very interesting topic. TBrandley 23:03, 1 October 2012 (UTC)
- Oppose very boring topic. Br'er Rabbit (talk) 05:38, 2 October 2012 (UTC)
- Half the topics on here are more boring. I've never had one of my article's on the main page, and this article has 3 points. TRLIJC19 (talk • contribs) 10:20, 2 October 2012 (UTC)
- Wake up; it's a television show. It probably is less boring than School Rumble, but everything else on this page has them both beat by 1.6km ;) Interesting is, of course, subjective, but you would benefit from taking an interest in more interesting topics. nb: teh points are deprecated; artefacts of a prior paradigm. Br'er Rabbit (talk) 11:29, 2 October 2012 (UTC)
- Half the topics on here are more boring. I've never had one of my article's on the main page, and this article has 3 points. TRLIJC19 (talk • contribs) 10:20, 2 October 2012 (UTC)
- Support. In theory any encyclopedic topic can be a featured article, and any featured article can be TFA. There's no blanket ban on TV shows. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 11:40, 2 October 2012 (UTC)
- Unfortunately not; missed E&C 1, E&C 2, I take it? Anyhoo, doesn't make them “encyclopedic”. Br'er Rabbit (talk) 12:58, 2 October 2012 (UTC)
- As you very well know, "encyclopedic" on Misplaced Pages is much more inclusive than in Britannica. I doubt Britannica would have an article on Chrisye, for example. Last I checked, they don't even have one on Jaws. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 13:02, 2 October 2012 (UTC)
- DYK… taht teh unworded {{Unencyclopedic}}? Br'er Rabbit (talk) 13:26, 2 October 2012 (UTC)
- Are you saying we need such a template? Encyclopedic, to me, means that it presents a notable subject in a neutral tone and gives a general idea (covering the major points) of a topic, accessible to most readers. I'd much rather see this on the main page than deconstruction in its current state. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 13:30, 2 October 2012 (UTC)
- click teh redlink; we had it, for years. But teh “Evil Inclusionists” deleted it. First tehy re-wrote, it, and re-wrote it, and renamed it, and re-wrote it, and after five TfDs and years of teh BATTLE tehy made it an unword. But I {{rescue}}d it: User:Jack Merridew/Unencyclopaedic. Br'er Rabbit (talk) 13:58, 2 October 2012 (UTC)
- Ah, okay. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 14:09, 2 October 2012 (UTC)
- I guarantee the majority of Misplaced Pages readers would rather read about an episode of a hit medical drama, than about some priest from 1452. I have no interest in working on other topics, and bringing television articles up to featured status is what I like to do on Misplaced Pages. TRLIJC19 (talk • contribs) 19:38, 2 October 2012 (UTC)
- Let's just insult the featured article writers of topics we don't like, because, you know, Misplaced Pages has enough article writers anyway. Or not. Let's stop trolling, Jack. Ed 19:41, 2 October 2012 (UTC)
- try setting a better example. Br'er Rabbit (talk) 20:20, 2 October 2012 (UTC)
- Oh yes, because I troll all the time. You make me giggle. Ed 20:22, 2 October 2012 (UTC)
- bzzt; you did it, again. Br'er Rabbit (talk) 20:35, 2 October 2012 (UTC)
- Oh yes, because I troll all the time. You make me giggle. Ed 20:22, 2 October 2012 (UTC)
- try setting a better example. Br'er Rabbit (talk) 20:20, 2 October 2012 (UTC)
- Let's just insult the featured article writers of topics we don't like, because, you know, Misplaced Pages has enough article writers anyway. Or not. Let's stop trolling, Jack. Ed 19:41, 2 October 2012 (UTC)
- I guarantee the majority of Misplaced Pages readers would rather read about an episode of a hit medical drama, than about some priest from 1452. I have no interest in working on other topics, and bringing television articles up to featured status is what I like to do on Misplaced Pages. TRLIJC19 (talk • contribs) 19:38, 2 October 2012 (UTC)
- Ah, okay. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 14:09, 2 October 2012 (UTC)
- click teh redlink; we had it, for years. But teh “Evil Inclusionists” deleted it. First tehy re-wrote, it, and re-wrote it, and renamed it, and re-wrote it, and after five TfDs and years of teh BATTLE tehy made it an unword. But I {{rescue}}d it: User:Jack Merridew/Unencyclopaedic. Br'er Rabbit (talk) 13:58, 2 October 2012 (UTC)
- Are you saying we need such a template? Encyclopedic, to me, means that it presents a notable subject in a neutral tone and gives a general idea (covering the major points) of a topic, accessible to most readers. I'd much rather see this on the main page than deconstruction in its current state. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 13:30, 2 October 2012 (UTC)
- DYK… taht teh unworded {{Unencyclopedic}}? Br'er Rabbit (talk) 13:26, 2 October 2012 (UTC)
- As you very well know, "encyclopedic" on Misplaced Pages is much more inclusive than in Britannica. I doubt Britannica would have an article on Chrisye, for example. Last I checked, they don't even have one on Jaws. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 13:02, 2 October 2012 (UTC)
- Unfortunately not; missed E&C 1, E&C 2, I take it? Anyhoo, doesn't make them “encyclopedic”. Br'er Rabbit (talk) 12:58, 2 October 2012 (UTC)
- Support recent FA, new TFA contributor, we need a balance of material on the main page including TV programmes. Bencherlite 23:23, 4 October 2012 (UTC)
- Support: If 13.74 million people cared to see the show, there definitely are people caring to read. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 17:25, 5 October 2012 (UTC)
- Support; to encourage a wider range of material on the main page and attract traffic to our website. Suggestion: The article is stable and is a good candidate for list-defined references. -- Dianna (talk) 18:59, 5 October 2012 (UTC)
- Support - These articles can't be ignored since large numbers of them are FAs. Agree with Crisco and Dianna. MathewTownsend (talk) 23:58, 5 October 2012 (UTC)
- Support per Bencherlite & others. We need to keep trickling these tv articles out. But when did we last have one? Johnbod (talk) 16:11, 6 October 2012 (UTC)
- Last episode was at least "Last Temptation of Krust" in May. The last TV-related topic was a character, Poppy Meadow, in August. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 16:19, 6 October 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks. That seems fine. Johnbod (talk) 13:20, 13 October 2012 (UTC)
November 4
Gabriel Fauré
Gabriel Fauré was a French composer, organist, pianist and teacher. He was one of the foremost French composers of his generation, and his musical style influenced many 20th-century composers. Among his best-known works are his Pavane, Requiem, nocturnes for piano, and the songs "Après un rêve" and "Clair de lune". Although his best-known and most accessible compositions are generally his earlier ones, Fauré composed many of his greatest works in his later years, in a harmonically and melodically much more complex style. Fauré was born into a cultured but not especially musical family. His talent became clear when he was a small boy. At the age of nine he was sent to a music college in Paris, where he was trained to be a church organist and choirmaster. Among his teachers was Camille Saint-Saëns, who became a lifelong friend. After graduating from the college in 1865 Fauré earned a modest living as an organist and teacher, leaving him little time for composition. (more...)I think this should be on the main page. It has 5 points in total.--Lucky102 (talk) 16:13, 17 October 2012 (UTC)
- Support the article, but the blurb doesn't need events he has in common with others (childhood, unspecific graduation), should better show what is his specialty. We began rehearsing his Requiem yesterday, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 10:53, 18 October 2012 (UTC)
- Not sure the table above says "Day of death, no article similar in over 6 months(composers, not operas), widely covered" but why should I have to look up there? When did he die anyway? Another dubious calculation of similarity "(composers, not operas)" - right, and with beards! When is the Glass opera just selected going as TFA? Fuller and better nominations please! Johnbod (talk) 23:57, 18 October 2012 (UTC)
November (8) 5
Thomas Percy (Gunpowder Plot)
Thomas Percy (c. 1560–1605) was a member of the group of provincial English Catholics who planned the failed Gunpowder Plot of 1605. A tall, physically impressive man, little is known of his early life beyond his matriculation in 1579 at the University of Cambridge, and his marriage in 1591 to Martha Wright. In 1596 a distant relation, Henry Percy, 9th Earl of Northumberland, appointed him constable of Alnwick Castle. In the years before 1603 Percy was the earl's intermediary in a series of confidential communications with King James VI of Scotland. Percy became disenchanted with James after his accession to the English throne in 1603, as he considered that James had reneged on promises of toleration for English Catholics. He met Robert Catesby in 1603 and in the following year joined Catesby's conspiracy to kill the king and his ministers by blowing up the House of Lords with gunpowder. Percy provided the group with funding and secured the leases to certain properties in London, one of which was the undercroft directly beneath the House of Lords, in which the gunpowder was finally placed. When the plot was exposed on 5 November 1605, Percy immediately fled to the Midlands, catching up with the others en route. They were besieged in Staffordshire on 8 November by the pursuing Sheriff of Worcester and his men; Percy and Catesby were killed. (more...)- as pending request, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 14:08, 10 October 2012 (UTC)
- Oppose for 8 Nov, support for 5th. Bonfire Night is always on the 5th, if this runs three days late it will just confuse readers. 54.240.197.1 (talk) 15:58, 10 October 2012 (UTC)
- Confuse? There was no bonfire, and the person died 8 Nov, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 17:24, 11 October 2012 (UTC)
- The point is that 5 November, aka "Bonfire Night" in the UK, is the day that the "Gunpowder plot" is commemorated, being the date in 1605 on which the conspiracy to blow up king and parliament was discovered. Percy is only really noteworthy because of his involvement with the plot; his death date three days later has no actual significance. For that reason I agree with the IP above. Brianboulton (talk) 17:56, 11 October 2012 (UTC)
- Confuse? There was no bonfire, and the person died 8 Nov, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 17:24, 11 October 2012 (UTC)
- Oppose for 8 Nov, support for 5th, as per Brianboulton's explanation. Prioryman (talk) 21:16, 11 October 2012 (UTC)
- Oppose for 8 Nov, support for 5th. Johnbod (talk) 13:18, 13 October 2012 (UTC)
- Changed to 5 Oct, all supports then? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 14:38, 13 October 2012 (UTC)
- All supports, so far. :-) Prioryman (talk) 20:39, 16 October 2012 (UTC)
- Support Good article for 5 Nov. - SchroCat (^ • @) 07:39, 19 October 2012 (UTC)
November 6
William Jennings Bryan presidential campaign, 1896
In 1896, William Jennings Bryan ran for U.S. president. The former Democratic congressman from Nebraska, who gained his party's presidential nomination in July of that year after electrifying the Democratic National Convention with his Cross of Gold speech, was defeated in the general election by the Republican candidate, former Ohio governor William McKinley. Born in 1860, Bryan grew up in rural Illinois and in 1887 moved to Nebraska, where he practiced law and entered politics. He won election to the House of Representatives in 1890, and was re-elected in 1892, before mounting an unsuccessful US Senate run. Despite the loss, he set his sights on higher office, believing he could be elected president in 1896 even though he remained a relatively minor figure in the Democratic Party. In anticipation of a presidential campaign, he spent much of 1895 and early 1896 making speeches across the United States; his oratory, for which he was noted, increased his popularity in his party. Bryan often spoke on the issue of the currency. He undertook an extensive tour by rail to bring his campaign to the people, speaking some 600 times, to an estimated 5,000,000 listeners. His campaign focused on silver, an issue which failed to appeal to the urban voter, and he was defeated. (more...)- as pending request, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 11:18, 9 October 2012 (UTC)
- Gerda, what does "as pending request" mean? Are you the nominator? The date relevance will not be obvious to everyone. When did we last have a similar article? NB Bryan's Cross of Gold speech from this same campaign was FA on July 9th. If you are going to nominate things, please do so properly. Johnbod (talk) 14:03, 17 October 2012 (UTC)
- Comment shouldn't we wait for this to be closed to see if we repeat 2008 and put Obama and Romney as TFAs? igordebraga ≠ 19:46, 9 October 2012 (UTC)
- We can always change it later, there's no harm in nominating it now. Ed 19:48, 9 October 2012 (UTC)
- Or we could nominate Sesame Street! .... maybe that was too soon. Anyway, I'm a bit concerned about doing the same thing again; wouldn't this be the third TFA for Barack Obama? --Rschen7754 19:26, 14 October 2012 (UTC)
- We can always change it later, there's no harm in nominating it now. Ed 19:48, 9 October 2012 (UTC)
- Support. A fine article for the date. Binksternet (talk) 20:19, 9 October 2012 (UTC)
- Oppose Bryan's Cross of Gold speech from this same campaign was FA on July 9th. Prefer Romney/Obama if possible. Is there an alternative? Johnbod (talk) 14:03, 17 October 2012 (UTC)
- Oppose Big date, Big Bird is watching and the History of Sesame Street is on the line as is the United States - we prefer something more Obama/Romney...Modernist (talk) 03:36, 18 October 2012 (UTC)
- Comment To be bold - there are these two FAs: Inauguration of Barack Obama, and George W. Romney...Modernist (talk) 04:02, 18 October 2012 (UTC)
- Comment - I think a historic campaign is much better and fairer than presenting one side, and I like to see the "loser" in focus ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 23:03, 18 October 2012 (UTC)
- Oppose for US polling day we should either run something completely unassociated with US politics, or we run something (or more than one thing, as four years ago) to be neutral. If this runs, we risk complaints on the one hand that we're featuring a Democrat (pro-Obama) and on the other that we're featuring a Democrat's defeat (pro-Romney). Per Modernist, if we are to touch US politics, I would run both George W. Romney and Inauguration of Barack Obama on November 6, using the same special coding that was devised four years ago to present them randomly. I would not want Barack Obama running for a third time as TFA. Bencherlite 08:10, 19 October 2012 (UTC)
November 13
Horseshoe Curve (Pennsylvania)
Horseshoe Curve is a 3,485-foot (1,062 m), triple-tracked, railroad curve on the Norfolk Southern Railway's Pittsburgh Line in Logan Township, Blair County in the U.S. state of Pennsylvania. It is close to 1,300 feet (400 m) in diameter and has a grade of almost 2 percent. As a train travels west from Altoona, it ascends almost 60 feet (20 m) in the 0.66-mile (1.06 km) segment that makes up the curve and rotates 220 degrees. The curve was completed in 1854 by the Pennsylvania Railroad as a means of lessening the grade to the summit of the Allegheny Mountains by increasing the distance. It was built as alternative to the time-consuming Allegheny Portage Railroad, the only other method of traversing the mountains. It has formed an important part of the region's transport infrastructure since its opening, and during World War II was targeted by Nazi Germany in 1942 as a part of Operation Pastorius. Horseshoe Curve was added to the National Register of Historic Places and designated a National Historic Landmark in 1966. It was also designated a National Historic Civil Engineering Landmark in 2004. Since its opening, Horseshoe Curve has been a tourist attraction. A trackside observation park for visitors was completed in 1879. The park was renovated and a visitor center constructed in the early 1990s. (more...)- Nov 13 is the date is was listed as a National Historic Landmark and on the National Register of Historic Places.
- Support PumpkinSky talk 19:29, 14 October 2012 (UTC)
- Support, on the right track, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:01, 15 October 2012 (UTC)
November 17
Metroid Prime
Metroid Prime is a video game developed by Retro Studios and Nintendo for the Nintendo GameCube, released in North America in 2002 and in Japan and Europe the following year. It is the first 3D game in the Metroid series, the fifth main installment, and is classified by Nintendo as a first-person adventure rather than a first-person shooter, due to the large exploration component of the game and its precedence over combat. Like previous games in the series, Metroid Prime has a science fiction setting, in which players control the bounty hunter Samus Aran. The story follows Samus as she battles the Space Pirates and their biological experiments on the planet Tallon IV. The game was a collaborative effort between Retro's staff in Austin, Texas and Japanese Nintendo employees, including producer Shigeru Miyamoto, who was the one who suggested the project after visiting Retro's headquarters in 2000. Despite initial backlash from fans due to the first-person perspective, the game was released to both universal acclaim and commercial success, selling more than a million units in North America alone.(more...)Five points: Date marks the tenth anniversary of the game's release. Featured since 2008, and I'm the main contributor. Last VG article on the main page was in September 20, which can lead to a two month break if no such TFA appears in October. igordebraga ≠ 03:37, 6 October 2012 (UTC)
- Support even though I never finished the game. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 04:48, 6 October 2012 (UTC)
- As a side note, archiving some of these links may be a good idea. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 04:49, 6 October 2012 (UTC)
- Support It's a great change of pace from all the articles about roads and dead people. Bruce Campbell (talk) 03:24, 8 October 2012 (UTC)
- Comment I'd rather the article run with no image than run with a picture of a building that isn't even in the article. Sven Manguard Wha? 21:09, 14 October 2012 (UTC)
- As you wish. igordebraga ≠ 03:32, 15 October 2012 (UTC)
November 20
Windsor Castle
Windsor Castle is a medieval castle and royal residence in Windsor in the English county of Berkshire, notable for its long association with the British royal family and for its architecture. The original motte-and-bailey castle, built after the Norman invasion by William the Conqueror, was designed to protect Norman dominance around the outskirts of London and to oversee a strategically important part of the River Thames. The castle's lavish early 19th-century State Apartments are architecturally significant, and the 15th-century St George's Chapel is an outstanding example of English Perpendicular Gothic design. Since the time of Henry I it has been used by a succession of monarchs and is the longest-occupied palace in Europe. A popular tourist attraction, it is used as a venue for hosting state visits, and is the Queen's preferred weekend home. It was used as a refuge for the royal family during the Second World War and survived a fire on 20 November 1992. More than five hundred people live and work in Windsor, making it the largest inhabited castle in the world. (more...)Four points: 20th anniversary of the fire, and a widely covered topic. Old-school citations, but everything else is first-rate. -- Dianna (talk) 22:57, 18 October 2012 (UTC)
- Support (I think I edited it a bit). Only about 3 more art & architecture articles left now, so let's space them out. Johnbod (talk) 23:52, 18 October 2012 (UTC)