| Revision as of 13:15, 8 November 2012 editYuMaNuMa (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers5,948 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 13:50, 8 November 2012 edit undoYuMaNuMa (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers5,948 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
| Disregard what I said before, continue to review it if you wish. '']]'' <sup>] </sup> 12:58, 8 November 2012 (UTC) | Disregard what I said before, continue to review it if you wish. '']]'' <sup>] </sup> 12:58, 8 November 2012 (UTC) | ||
| Deleted content: Supported to wait for any good article nomination until the issues are solved. The reviews section is the WORST i've ever seen! Unscientific, with nonsense citations, defended by a few users - including YuMaNuMa - with many users sees it as biased, see talk! ] (]) 13:07, 8 November 2012 (UTC) | |||
| :Look, quit distorting information by suggesting more than many users supported him, Misplaced Pages is a transparent community and any distortion of information will only have an impact on your credibility in the future. By the many users, you mean Cantaloupe? His is the only user I've encounter that supports your view of what sources should be included and it seems like even he abandoned the discussion as he hasn't replied in two week. '']]'' <sup>] </sup> 13:15, 8 November 2012 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 13:50, 8 November 2012
GA Review
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Obtund (talk · contribs) 09:55, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
Disregard what I said before, continue to review it if you wish. YuMaNuMa 12:58, 8 November 2012 (UTC)