Misplaced Pages

:Articles for deletion/Olympus Worldwide Chauffeured Services: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 02:36, 12 November 2012 editBeyondKneesReach (talk | contribs)24 edits Olympus Worldwide Chauffeured Services: language fix← Previous edit Revision as of 23:37, 14 November 2012 edit undoQworty (talk | contribs)13,129 edits Olympus Worldwide Chauffeured Services: Commenter is blocked paid editorNext edit →
Line 9: Line 9:
*'''Keep'''. Qworty's edits to this article have resulted in a misleading article that does not fully represent whether or not it is notable. I think that anyone reviewing this particular AfD should view , which is what it looked like before Qworty removed all of the sources and content. I'll also note that Qworty effectively deleted the article and bypassed Misplaced Pages protocol when he blanked the article and made it a redirect in . His edit summary, "lack of WP:RS," for that particular and peculiar deletion reflects a lack of sources which was manufactured by the editor. The original article appears to have support from multiple reliable sources. ] (]) 02:29, 12 November 2012 (UTC) *'''Keep'''. Qworty's edits to this article have resulted in a misleading article that does not fully represent whether or not it is notable. I think that anyone reviewing this particular AfD should view , which is what it looked like before Qworty removed all of the sources and content. I'll also note that Qworty effectively deleted the article and bypassed Misplaced Pages protocol when he blanked the article and made it a redirect in . His edit summary, "lack of WP:RS," for that particular and peculiar deletion reflects a lack of sources which was manufactured by the editor. The original article appears to have support from multiple reliable sources. ] (]) 02:29, 12 November 2012 (UTC)
:*'''Comment'''. And it looks like Qworty has used this deletion via redirect tactic on other pages, including the ] article in . This type of editing seems like vigilante editing and does not help the project reach consensus where consensus is needed. ] (]) 02:35, 12 November 2012 (UTC) :*'''Comment'''. And it looks like Qworty has used this deletion via redirect tactic on other pages, including the ] article in . This type of editing seems like vigilante editing and does not help the project reach consensus where consensus is needed. ] (]) 02:35, 12 November 2012 (UTC)
*BeyondKneesReach is the blocked paid editor who created both articles, and who created this sock farm . As a blocked editor, he has no right to comment here, so I am going to strike his comments. As to his false allegation, I happily submit my editing on Olympus Worldwide Chauffeured Services for open review . As you can see from my edit summaries, every "source" the paid editor provided was either non-], or an outright lie, containing none of the supposed information. This person takes money from his clients, lies to them that he can write deletion-proof articles, and then writes schlocky articles like this one, with false and unreliable sourcing. He should leave Misplaced Pages for good and give all of his clients refunds. ] (]) 23:37, 14 November 2012 (UTC)

Revision as of 23:37, 14 November 2012

Olympus Worldwide Chauffeured Services

Olympus Worldwide Chauffeured Services (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:CORP. Non-notable company that paid for article creation. Article was written by this notorious sock farmer whose various accounts have been blocked over 50 times. Qworty (talk) 06:13, 8 November 2012 (UTC).

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:50, 8 November 2012 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:50, 8 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Keep. Qworty's edits to this article have resulted in a misleading article that does not fully represent whether or not it is notable. I think that anyone reviewing this particular AfD should view this version of the article, which is what it looked like before Qworty removed all of the sources and content. I'll also note that Qworty effectively deleted the article and bypassed Misplaced Pages protocol when he blanked the article and made it a redirect in this edit. His edit summary, "lack of WP:RS," for that particular and peculiar deletion reflects a lack of sources which was manufactured by the editor. The original article appears to have support from multiple reliable sources. BeyondKneesReach (talk) 02:29, 12 November 2012 (UTC)
  • BeyondKneesReach is the blocked paid editor who created both articles, and who created this sock farm . As a blocked editor, he has no right to comment here, so I am going to strike his comments. As to his false allegation, I happily submit my editing on Olympus Worldwide Chauffeured Services for open review . As you can see from my edit summaries, every "source" the paid editor provided was either non-WP:RS, or an outright lie, containing none of the supposed information. This person takes money from his clients, lies to them that he can write deletion-proof articles, and then writes schlocky articles like this one, with false and unreliable sourcing. He should leave Misplaced Pages for good and give all of his clients refunds. Qworty (talk) 23:37, 14 November 2012 (UTC)
Categories: