| Revision as of 02:45, 19 November 2012 editSineBot (talk | contribs)Bots2,555,979 editsm Signing comment by Kilbarry1 - "Addition of Heading "Catholic Ethos""← Previous edit |
Revision as of 02:59, 19 November 2012 edit undoYogesh Khandke (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users14,597 edits →Removal of vital information from the lead: one moreNext edit → |
| (2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) |
| Line 17: |
Line 17: |
|
"Dr James Reilly, the Minister for Health, said we "could not pre-judge" the situation and that he was waiting for the results of the investigations, adding he had no evidence to suggest a Catholic ethos at the hospital prevented the pregnant woman's life from being saved by a medical termination." |
|
"Dr James Reilly, the Minister for Health, said we "could not pre-judge" the situation and that he was waiting for the results of the investigations, adding he had no evidence to suggest a Catholic ethos at the hospital prevented the pregnant woman's life from being saved by a medical termination." |
|
The rest of the comment is hardly worth quoting by itself as it is banal. When the results of the official enquiry are released the fact that the Minister for Health had no evidence that a Catholic ethos was to blame, will be seen as very relevant indeed. <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 02:44, 19 November 2012 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|
The rest of the comment is hardly worth quoting by itself as it is banal. When the results of the official enquiry are released the fact that the Minister for Health had no evidence that a Catholic ethos was to blame, will be seen as very relevant indeed. <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 02:44, 19 November 2012 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|
|
|
|
|
== Removal of vital information from the lead == |
|
|
|
|
|
Three points have been removed from the lead, (1) that prima facie Halappanavar's death was caused by denial of termination of her pregnancy when it was indicated. (2) That it were Ireland's Catholic laws and ethos that were responsible for the decision that her caregivers took. (3) that ther family was unhappy that Catholic religious laws applied to those like Halappanavar who was a Hindu and not a Catholic. Please reinstate the three back as there are numerous supporting reliable sources for the same. Thanks. ] (]) 02:54, 19 November 2012 (UTC) |
|
|
:Also Amnesty's communication with Irish authorities. ] (]) 02:59, 19 November 2012 (UTC) |
I have restored the reference to "Catholic ethos" in the comment by the Minister for Health as follows:
"Dr James Reilly, the Minister for Health, said we "could not pre-judge" the situation and that he was waiting for the results of the investigations, adding he had no evidence to suggest a Catholic ethos at the hospital prevented the pregnant woman's life from being saved by a medical termination."
The rest of the comment is hardly worth quoting by itself as it is banal. When the results of the official enquiry are released the fact that the Minister for Health had no evidence that a Catholic ethos was to blame, will be seen as very relevant indeed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kilbarry1 (talk • contribs) 02:44, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
Three points have been removed from the lead, (1) that prima facie Halappanavar's death was caused by denial of termination of her pregnancy when it was indicated. (2) That it were Ireland's Catholic laws and ethos that were responsible for the decision that her caregivers took. (3) that ther family was unhappy that Catholic religious laws applied to those like Halappanavar who was a Hindu and not a Catholic. Please reinstate the three back as there are numerous supporting reliable sources for the same. Thanks. Yogesh Khandke (talk) 02:54, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
