Misplaced Pages

User talk:Doug Weller/Genealogia Lindisfarorum: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< User talk:Doug Weller Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 12:59, 19 November 2012 editPaul Bedson (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users13,657 edits -y← Previous edit Revision as of 16:35, 19 November 2012 edit undoAgricolae (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers31,009 edits →List of names: No, Stenton is not listing the names in the Genealogia LindisfarorumNext edit →
Line 3: Line 3:
== List of names == == List of names ==


Of the names being listed (and removed), none but Woden even appear in the Genealogia Lindisfarorum. ] (]) 02:57, 19 November 2012 (UTC) Of the names being listed (and removed), <s>none but Woden</s>many don't even appear in the Genealogia Lindisfarorum. ] (]) 02:57, 19 November 2012 (UTC)


:Please see :Please see
Line 10: Line 10:


The names in the Genealogia Lindisrarorum are listed and correctly referenced there. <span style="text-shadow:grey 0.1em 0.1em 0.1em; class=texhtml; font-family: Verdana;">] ❉]❉</span> 12:59, 19 November 2012 (UTC) The names in the Genealogia Lindisrarorum are listed and correctly referenced there. <span style="text-shadow:grey 0.1em 0.1em 0.1em; class=texhtml; font-family: Verdana;">] ❉]❉</span> 12:59, 19 November 2012 (UTC)

:You are misreading Stenton. He isn't talking directly about the ''Genealogia Lindisfarorum'', but a genealogy 'inserted into' Vespasion B VI of the Anglian collection. The heading of this is damaged, reading ''Lind...ar...a''. Stenton identifies this with Lindsey by comparison with the ''Genealogia Lindisfarorum'' of the ''Chronicon ex Chronicis''. The names he then gives are those in the Vespasion B VI pedigree, not the ''Gen. Lin.''. You can look at the actual Chronicon ex Chronicis pedigree and see that this is the case. ] (]) 16:35, 19 November 2012 (UTC)

Revision as of 16:35, 19 November 2012

WikiProject iconGenealogy NA‑class
WikiProject iconThis page is within the scope of WikiProject Genealogy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Genealogy on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GenealogyWikipedia:WikiProject GenealogyTemplate:WikiProject GenealogyGenealogy
NAThis page does not require a rating on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.

List of names

Of the names being listed (and removed), none but Wodenmany don't even appear in the Genealogia Lindisfarorum. Agricolae (talk) 02:57, 19 November 2012 (UTC)

Please see
  • Stenton, F. M. (Frank Merry), "Lindsey and its Kings", Essays presented to Reginald Lane Poole, 1927, pp. 136-150, reprinted in Preparatory to Anglo-Saxon England: Being the Collected Papers of Frank Merry Stenton : Edited by Doris Mary Stenton, Oxford, 1970, pp. 127-137

The names in the Genealogia Lindisrarorum are listed and correctly referenced there. Paul Bedson ❉talk❉ 12:59, 19 November 2012 (UTC)

You are misreading Stenton. He isn't talking directly about the Genealogia Lindisfarorum, but a genealogy 'inserted into' Vespasion B VI of the Anglian collection. The heading of this is damaged, reading Lind...ar...a. Stenton identifies this with Lindsey by comparison with the Genealogia Lindisfarorum of the Chronicon ex Chronicis. The names he then gives are those in the Vespasion B VI pedigree, not the Gen. Lin.. You can look at the actual Chronicon ex Chronicis pedigree and see that this is the case. Agricolae (talk) 16:35, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
Categories: