Revision as of 21:51, 1 December 2012 editBabbaQ (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users104,504 edits →AfDs...← Previous edit | Revision as of 21:58, 1 December 2012 edit undoBabbaQ (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users104,504 edits - nonsenseNext edit → | ||
Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
], ] | ], ] | ||
== revert == | |||
Regarding your revert to ], without edit summary. Recognition by other states and establishing bilateral agreements has nothing todo with UN Charter and is already covered in the 'Declaration and Act of State Doctrine' in the first paragraph and links to more up to date information from 2012. Please explain your reason for reverting or self revert.--] (]) 17:14, 1 December 2012 (UTC) | |||
:Well, you are seriously POV-pushing right now.--] (]) 19:54, 1 December 2012 (UTC) | |||
:: I am seriously asking you a simple question, what is the reason for the unexplained revert. If you don't have a reason, don't intend to self-revert or try to work this out, just throw accusations I am going to report you and let someone else worry about your attitude.--] (]) 20:55, 1 December 2012 (UTC) | |||
== AfDs... == | == AfDs... == |
Revision as of 21:58, 1 December 2012
Hello, BabbaQ. You have new messages at Template talk:Did you know.You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. Hello, BabbaQ. You have new messages at TJRC's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Welcome
|
User talk:BabbaQ/Archive1, User talk:BabbaQ/Archive2
AfDs...
1. Stop attacking me personally based on the fact that there are perceived issues with your articles. I'm not the only one voting to delete them.
2. Maybe if you treated WP as an encyclopedia instead of a news source, this trouble would be avoided. You are complaining that JEM and Awa "will be notable" because the X Factor final will be over in a week. I don't know how much more clearly this needs to contravene WP:CRYSTAL for you to realize it is not appropriate.
3. We have very clear policies on notability for musicians. Winning a talent program is not among them, nor is the potential of winning the program a criterion. Furthermore, a contract is not notable, either. When a musician releases an album that meets the necessary requirements, at that point, the musician is notable, not before. MSJapan (talk) 21:16, 1 December 2012 (UTC)
- Response
1. It is not a vote.
2. If you feel that I have attacked you personally, then you take AfDs to personally and that is not a good sign.
3. We are of different opinions but it seems like you want me to not have my personal opinion. Which is not appreciated I am perfecly capable of making up my own mind. Cheers.--BabbaQ (talk) 21:51, 1 December 2012 (UTC)